100
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Carl@hexbear.net 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

following months of naval strikes against narcoboats.

Fuck this article for giving even an ounce of credibility to this. Trump has spent the last several months murdering random people and I guarantee his strikes against Mexico will be exactly the same.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 45 points 3 days ago

can't wait to go into work and whenever the fact that we're fucking invading mexico gets brought up my coworkers will just parrot whatever trumposphere narrative just like they did with Venezuela (did you know Maduro wasn't even president? no I don't know who juan guaido even is) and then act like I'm fucking Winston Smith brainfucked by the Ministry of Truth for telling them how fucking wrong and stupid they are

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago

God, the new latam chud talking point about Maduro is now "he was torturing and killing children en masse"

Manufacturing narratives and realities is making me lose my mind.

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago

Right-wingers have a bizarre obsession with creating fantasies that involve violence towards children

[-] CitizensTyrant@hexbear.net 29 points 2 days ago

Because it makes their fantasies about diddling kids seem tolerable by comparison

[-] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago

Every accusation a confession

[-] vegeta1@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

The most famous child abuser in the world cares about children's welfare. Jfc

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

What the fuck is the deal with fascists and opening up new fronts?

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

I'm going to guess that this is going to turn into a regime change operation against Sheinbaum

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago

Could spiral out of control if the cartels fight back, they can shock and inflict some serious casualties on American forces

Tho it's likely their contacts with American intelligence will warn them beforehand and the US will just target civilians

[-] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

Bread and circuses used to distract from stuff like this but now it is the circus. They have done such a great job of building up a genre around military action and imperialism since the 90s. Every lib who spent the Obama years writing woke CIA fanfic about invading Libya has led to this. President TV, of course, is going to ramp it up and remove all subtlety. Why produce fictional Jack Ryans when you can just go invade and film it for Paramount+?

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

You mean he's going to invade Mexico no need to beat around the bush.

[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I hope they don't, but I think any sort of boots on the ground operation, and potentially airstrikes, would be a huge mistake on the regime's part for too many reasons to list.

[-] Homer_Simpson@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

What does this mean for my Mexican vacation?

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

What a shit show. The nation of Mexico doesn't have much of an ability to resist militarily but the Cartels Trump claims to be going after absolutely have the capability and inclination to retaliate violently on US soil

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You got it the wrong way round. The Mexican military and navy absolutely has the means to resist in a protracted conflict and even strike back. The reason it doesn't engage in out and out warfare with cartels is that these are integrated into rural and urban communities, are very decentralized and have no qualms about engaging in acts of terrorism to avoid capture.

Do not fall for the narrative that the cartels are in total control of Mexico, the firepower and manpower available to the state is overwhelmingly superior, but that matters very little when it comes to asymmetrical warfare. The juice ain't worth the squeeze.

Even if that weren't the case, narcos would be the first line of offense and sabotage for the US, they're already terrorizing the Mexican people on a schedule that is eerily convenient to the US and have longstanding close links.

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Do not fall for the narrative that the cartels are in total control of Mexico

The Mexican army is it's own gang in many ways

[-] jack@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

True of all capitalist militaries, much less in Mexico than in the US

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

It'll be hilarious when the cartels release videos of what they do to the troops

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Like Somalia all over again but the reprisals won't be hilarious

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, hope langley have a large call center support for their assets. And cartels absolutely won’t retaliate, cmon.

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Are you suggesting a bunch of people notorious for kidnapping, murder, and intimidation won't do those things?

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, they can’t do it to usa, thus it’s not relevant, they can’t easily bribe their way out of trouble. It’s same as some american mafia trying to wield intimidation against japan, doesn’t work, no leverage, no fucks given.

If you are under some intimidation blood feud logic, you can’t even find out who gave the order to launch drone strike, and then your only response to kill some dea agents, which invites only more response. They’ll eat their losses and go underground, if they are interacting with the foreign state. The relevant part are civilians hurt by this, and some part of patriotic sentiment, those might do something

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
100 points (100.0% liked)

news

24524 readers
635 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS