123
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Seinfeld had an episode about cell phones, though.

I don't remember the exact plot, but I think it was Elaine called somebody about something serious, like expressing condolences for a death or something, and she called from a cell phone while she was out and about, instead of calling from a land line at home. This was seen as a faux pas.

[-] dwemthy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That sounds vaguely familiar.. did she have bad reception or something and her condolences came across as insulting as words got cut

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

My memory was that she had bad reception, but that the call wasn't cut, and when she hung up, she thought she had done a good job until corrected by Jerry. But I haven't seen this episode in over two decades probably, so my memory isn't going to be exactly right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago

Giving Seinfeld shit for having a laugh track doesn't make sense. There are shows from eras before and after using laugh tracks, so Seinfeld is not an outlier in that regard. However, Jerry's occupation is literally a comedian. Having a laugh track in Seinfeld thus makes more sense than most shows that have one.

[-] SpinItBetter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The laugh track is also used to fill in the pause the actors had to take due to the audience reaction. Just like with comedy shows people in groups laugh more than when you are watching at home.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Loce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I can already see Kramer running NFT scams... or crypto rug pull xD

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Something something Seinfeld something something Epstein island lemonade

[-] jpablo68@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

Kramer: Look Jerry, twenty thousand dollars in ethereum.

Jerry: but who's gonna pay for that?

K: You know my friend Bob Sacamano he just bought three of those bored monkeys for ten thousand last week and they are now fifteen a piece, I tell you Jerry this is a great business.

J: but they are JAY PEE GEES!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I could see george having FOMO and doing most of this shit. Kramer would fall for the AI chatbot.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

*The AI chatbot would fall for Kramer.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  • Google being evil aside, I still think about how great google maps is and how it seemed to come out of nowhere.
  • Paypal is straight up evil, no redeeming value for the past decade. Use something else. They also own Venmo.
  • Battery packs and cell phones are great in that general sense.
[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Out of nowhere? MapQuest and printed out directions were a thing for many years.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Mapquest was no google maps. Google had you in real time recommending restaurants and giving you directions with voice. You could see a streetview. It felt like a huge leap at the time to me. You may have a different viewpoint.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Was PayPal always evil, though? The concept of it wasn't. People wanted an easier way to conduct transactions electronically. Something faster and more convenient than, say, a Western Union money transfer order.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

it was created by merging a company started by peter thiel with one started by elon musk. how much more evil can you get?

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Almost every country around the world has a free way of moving money between people without using an app or third party website. It's just a standard part of banking. I haven't looked into it, but I wouldn't be surprised if Paypal has bribed and lobbied to keep that kind of functionality out of the US. So, the US has a shittier, more expensive, less convenient, more privacy-invasive version of what everybody else takes for granted. Just like with medical care, taxes, etc.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I would expect the American credit card companies and banks lobby just as hard if not harder to prevent that from being a free service in the US. Electronic Funds Transfers are an option at every bank in the US, but they’re not very easy for individuals and seem to always charge a fee to either the sender or receiver.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, just like how tax preparation companies lobby to keep the IRS from just telling people what they owe in taxes. It keeps the tax prep companies in business.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be fair, moving money between countries was not trivial before PayPal.

To use Europe as an example, SEPA became operative in 2008, about six years after PayPal first became available in Europe. Before that, all international money transfers had to go through SWIFT and the easiest way was probably to use a credit card (and good luck trying to send money to a someone who isn't a company with that).

Even with SEPA (or for domestic transfers), PayPal offered superior comfort over entering the recipient's IBAN into a homebanking software. Processing was faster, too.

Of course these days banks in Europe have to offer instant transfers, there's a QR code standard to read invoice data into banking apps, and they're working on a full-blown PayPal replacement to get the last comfort bits down as well. It'll be interesting to see how that works out.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, revolut is still a thing despite instant transfers, because being able to just send money to a phone number from your contact list is still hella more convenient than sharing QR codes or IBANs.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To go a little more in-depth, if a product would simplify certain aspects of life, make them more straightforward and less prone to a chain of comedic errors, then it's a good product.

If a product makes things more complex, has more things to go wrong, and more corners and edge cases for some weirdo like Kramer or George to think they've spotted a killer side hustle, then it's a bad product.

Now, I'm not saying that smartphones and computers and the Internet aren't complicated, but they are far simpler to how things were done before. Read old hobbyist magazines to get a sense of the complex system of self-addressed stamped envelopes and hand-compiled mailing lists it used to take to get info on your hobby. Meeting a friend in a nearby town to go see a movie at a theater you haven't been to before required a shocking number of cross-referenced paper resources.

[-] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, George would think he's spotted some slick NFT grift or crypto rug pull that it turns out he was the one getting rug pulled, by Newman.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

America's screen writers adopted the Seinfeld paradigm years ago:

No hugging, no learning.

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Or — just hear me out, I'm going to say something crazy — simply consider: will it draw criticism?

This way, you don't have to use any of your attention span on Seinfeld or his shitty show.

Literally everything should draw criticism. Shakespeare's Hamlet and Arizona Iced Tea draw criticism.

But if you're going to be a lemming about it, you could use basically any sitcom set in the 90's or 2000's. I remember reading once that the writers of Buffy The Vampire Slayer deliberately avoided giving the characters cell phones because the characters having reliable, cheap instant communication at a distance eliminates a lot of plots.

Use Saved By The Bell if you have to. Screech, the nerd, is blathering about in the first act. The gang gets into a scrape in the second act. Does Screech:

  1. fail to use correctly as you would in the real world, because if he did the plot wouldn't happen at all? -- Great tech.
  2. Use realistically to solve the problem, and Zach has a little moment where he admits Screech was right about it? -- Good tech.
  3. Cause, instigate or worsen the scrape the gang is in with which has to be solved by some other means especially deus ex machina by adult characters? -- Bad tech.
  4. Play the main role in this, a Very Special Episode? -- Bad Bad Very Bad Epstein Bad tech.
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hmm. Do we want good tech, or do we want to inspire new Seinfeld episodes? This is a tough one.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, the show has been off the air for a long time, but I absolutely could see Kramer having an AI chatbot girlfriend, or George Costanza trying to get people suckered into an NFT grift/cryptocurrency side hustle.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

There were no good episodes of Seinfeld.

[-] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

There were no good episodes of Seinfeld.

Fixed

There is no good in Seinfeld

(genocide support paedophile that he is)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Apple Maps, on the other hand, is fully worthy of an episode.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

"So what's the deal with inflation? Whenever I just make more dollars, I get in trouble."

In "The Checks" they get a bunch of tiny payments from Japan.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
123 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

10878 readers
783 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS