520
there is another (lemmy.world)
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mech@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago

X^4-6^ were better.

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 66 points 17 hours ago

"Sorry, I wasn't taught the negative multiplication table"

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 47 points 17 hours ago
[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I never knew Yoda was such an accomplished mathematician...

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 10 points 4 hours ago

Tbf it can sometimes be difficult to understand him

img

[-] grissino@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago
[-] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 85 points 19 hours ago

Don’t be so positive.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

My group theory teacher:

"Always two, there are [except in the degenerate case where a = 0]."

[-] xia@lemmy.ca 20 points 17 hours ago
[-] somtwo@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

What are you, IEEE floating point? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754

Edit: actually read the negative zero article and saw IEEE floating point mentioned.... kinda kills the joke

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 14 points 15 hours ago

"Minus zero" redirects here; not to be confused with Godzilla Minus Zero.

Well thanks Wikipedia!

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 16 hours ago

You dare speak of the degeneracy!? 🤪

[-] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 43 points 19 hours ago

You just spoke the "|" in "|X| = 3" silent.

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

That additionally would imply an uncountably infinite set of complex solutions.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Why assume the solution is in the complex numbers, and not in

  • the real numbers (2 solutions)
  • the algebraic numbers (countably many)
  • the natural numbers (1 solution)
  • the complex surreal numbers (proper-class many)

Gotta use some context to interpret these things :)

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well it's not physics. Show 'em what happens when you don't specify those kinds of things.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think teachers need to specify that answers should be in the largest class of numbers students have been introduced to so far at school :)

If students are smart and motivated enough to learn about other stuff outside of school, they're smart enough to interpret the question.

[-] xia@lemmy.ca 16 points 17 hours ago

It's so unnatural...

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 18 hours ago

Another, there is*

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
520 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

19101 readers
2630 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS