66
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Ah yes the leftists who complain and cry at the federal election but take no interest in primaries, or joining the party or volunteering for their preferred candidate. American leftists just wanna sit on their ass and be handed a candidate, so that’s what you get.

Last one you guys didnt take part in so they picked the old white man, when you complained they gave you an educated black woman and you “leftists” went “eeew not that” while cheering for Bernie, another ancient white man.

You guys are a shit show of contradiction, shit slinging and infighting because nobody is good enough to be an ally anymore. This is why I blame all of you for Trump, the American right and the left. You guys suck, and the rest of the leftists in sane countries know it

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Is that Gavage Nuisance in the bottom picture?

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also you guys are fucking idiots.

“If you don’t pick a better candidate then I’ll just let the one who wants concentration camps and to erase all of Palestine win”

Like, seriously, look at the big picture. Do you think Kamala who would have still supported Israel would have been worse for Gaza? It’s literally not possible. You guys fucked up the entire planet in your pride.

Now I’m not saying the DNC isn’t wrong, they’re fucking morons. But you guys just gave up on global warming, gay rights, trans rights, Gaza, any sembles of the environment, public health, the entire “justice” system, the courts, your immigrant neighbours, all people of colour in the US, and women’s rights.

I cannot express how much I fucking hate people like you right now.

Go ahead and downvote me. “But it’s not right”. Yeah? We’ll choosing to let this happen is leagues worse. You guaranteed the genecide in Gaza would be the worst it ever could be you fucking morons.

Go out and pressure the DNC to not be shit, but don’t fucking say there’s no difference between Kamala and Trump.

[-] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

i'm glad i'm not the only one shitting on 3rd party/abstainers every chance i get. high and mighty morality police, usually saying shit like "kamala was always going to lose" while simultaneously trying to push the 100% guaranteed fail action of 3rd party or sitting out.

whether they're actually russian propaganda trolls or not hardly matters--they're shit human beings either way

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed. But I'm not going to publicly endorse a dead-end DNC loser before it's necessary. The DNC needs to act like people aren't required to vote for them and field a candidate that can actually win votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah...

To the people "wanting to teach the DNC a lesson", in the nicest way possible, you're fucking idiots.

They threw literally ever other minority group under the bus, and got absolutely nothing for it - if anything they actually got less than nothing, because Trump wasn't just going soft on Israel, he was actively cheering them on!

I will never understand the mentality of choosing that hill to die on... Like couldn't you guys have waited until Trump was at least off the board first.

Man was literally on his way to a lifetime in jail and bankruptcy, that he got out of scot-free because you guys decided 2024 was the time for a protest vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

But you guys just gave up on global warming, gay rights, trans rights, Gaza, any sembles of the environment, public health, the entire “justice” system, the courts, your immigrant neighbours, all people of colour in the US, and women’s rights.

You forgot to include USAID.

Anyone who keeps clutching to Gaza and says Kamala would have been as bad as Trump can suck my dick.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I forgot a ton of things. 

AI, your data privacy, your parents retirement, NATO, electric cars, green energy, antitrust, the chip shortage. 

There’s a huge list. 

load more comments (61 replies)
[-] clot27@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Its funny how people act as if kamala lost because she supported genocide

No lol, leftists hold miniscule power in electorate, kamala lost because she ran a shitty campaign and neo liberal economics will only make things worse for incumbent.

[-] itistime@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some factors for losing:

  • People were already salty that Biden even decided to run again, and then he forced a different candidate upon the voters.
  • Status quo
  • Woman
  • Not white
  • Zionism apologist
  • Obviously dumb strategy to ditch the “weird” name calling, and placate the right.
  • I not sure what to call it, but there is definitely an issue in our country of picking the “popular kid”, or “cool kid”

Her loss was a combination of many factors, including the support of genocidal Zionism. Do not ignore it.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

America doesn't have a left wing. America has a right wing and an extreme right wing. The closest to an actual leftist that America has is Mamdani, and America's so-called left wing politicians tried their best to make him look evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I voted for Kamala, but I was pissed we didn't have a fucking primary. If we had a primary, we might have gotten Bernie on the ballot, or Elizabeth Warren, or Butegig, or anyone else. But instead Biden claimed to be running, then dropped out at the last minute so opps no time for primaries. I'm salty as hell that democrats didn't get a choice. It felt deliberate and coordinated.

[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Kamala lost because it was obvious from the beginning that she was a bad candidate whose only hope of becoming President was to be parachuted into the role via the 25th Amendment once Biden's mental state truly deteriorated. Unfortunately for her and the DNC, Biden's condition declined right as a key presidential debate rolled around, and his declining cognitive health became so utterly apparent that not even Reddit's tyrannical cabal of power mods could cover it up anymore.

Before that debate, even merely suggesting that Biden was senile would have gotten you labelled a Nazi and banned from at least a dozen subreddits.

THAT is why she lost to a convicted felon.

[-] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Did you watch the debates between Biden and Trump. Biden was far more articulate and sane than trump, and it still wasn't enough.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Both of them were clearly demented. Trump just making shit up and Biden interrupting him to mumble incoherently, ending in "We Beat Medicaid!"

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nah he was just quiet senile instead of loud senile. I've had patients that are rather agreeable despite low cognitive function. They don't wind up in the hospital as much and get discharged quicker because the agreeableness means they can accept home caregivers more safely, but they very much still need assistance with decision making. He wasn't more coherent per se, just more able to cooperate with his handlers. Ignoring morality (a distressingly common occurrence throughout the history of humanity) is it preferable to have a leader who accepts control of the oligarchs more placidly or more chaotically? I don't speak to my parents anymore for a variety of reasons (including politics) but one tiny spark of something they did get right was that trump is slightly harder to keep under control, and is accelerating the destruction of our broken political system. We ultimately just differed in opinion on whether the coming system is more likely to be better or worse.

[-] Aneb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Its very hard to discern the real reason Harris lost in the election. Especially with interference the Right orchestrated with mail in voting and voting IDs, they tanked the left's momentum while gassing Trump's reelection with actual fraud. The results of numerous investigations was that if someone committed fraud or voted twice it was for a Republican candidate... but don't worry isn't not like Trump controlled the swing districts and threw away votes for Harris.

[-] emokidforever@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

"Trump on Elon Musk: 'He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.'"

Not totally convinced she lost.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

and voting IDs

Just another reminder: Read the SAVE Act and start getting together valid ID under it now, don't wait to find out if it's going to pass first. Valid ID has other uses too so it's not a total waste if it doesn't pass and gets you ahead of both the line and any GOP fuckery with trying to get ID if it does pass.

Especially if you are someone who has ever changed their name, as SAVE allows for some forms of voter ID that don't verify citizenship, but those have to be paired with a birth record with a matching name, which doesn't exist if you have ever changed your name (such as being a married woman, or many trans folks).

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

neo libs must choose… either there is not enough progressives to demand a progressive candidate so they are not a large enough block to have changed the outcome OR they are large enough bloc to demand progressive cannidate and the democrats ignoring them cost them the election.

and they always pivot talking points

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Schrodinger's Left: small enough for Dems to ignore, large enough to make Dems lose

[-] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The enemy is both strong and weak.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] r1veRRR@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Funny, that works just as well in reverse: If "the left" is big enough that all the posturing about not voting for the lesser evil, and the moral purity BS caused Trump to win, they are responsible for untold horrors simply because they want to grand stand. If they aren't big enough, they're irrelevant anyway, so why would anyone care?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

DNC will throw an election before moving to the left.

[-] Zacpod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

As we've seen, repeatedly.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history because Democrats know they can punish voters for being disloyal simply by allowing Republicans to win. If you demand too much from Democrats they will throw the election. It's essentially a hostage situation, you must give unconditional support to the Good Cop or the Bad Cop will beat you to death. You don't want the Bad Cop, do you?

If we don't abolish this system we're all going to die.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 1 week ago

Only a moron would have looked at the two options we had and not picked Harris.

Was she a good candidate? Actually yes if you look at her Senate voting history. She was closer to Sanders than any other senator. She also, as VP, supported investigating Israel so they could bypass the law requiring us to give support.

Did she run a good campaign? Absolutely not. But, she basically had no time to actually run one. She needed money, fast, so she softened her stance on some things to secure it.

Was it a bad move? Yes. Was it a bad enough move to let Donald "I'm going to be a dictator on day one and you'll never have to vote again" Trump win? Absolutely not.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do you think you're going to be able to reason with someone who literally just said that the Democrats threw the election on purpose because online leftists "demanded too much"?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history

Dems already shat the bed in 2022, handing Republicans a narrow majority in the House because they refused to pursue Congressional criminal misconduct from the prior administration or do anything about state voter disenfranchisement or gerrymandering while they controlled the federal government. Nevermind the clown car of corporate toadies and unloveable hacks they larded up with corporate donations.

Little reason to believe they'd do better in 2024, given that Biden made "supporting a genocide" and "rolling back COVID benefits" his central platforms for the next two years.

How is an election "winnable" when your party is married to policies everyone hates? It's like complaining about Mitt Romney losing in 2012, when Obama was underwater. The GOP trotted out an absolutely odious corporate turd - a man who literally penned the editorial "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" four years earlier - and married him to a nepo-baby who hates social security as VP. Of course they fucking lost.

You don't get to talk about an election being "winnable" if you insist sandbagging the primaries to run loser candidates in the general.

2024 was Trump's election to lose. He capitalized on people's disgust with liberals. He leaned heavily on TPUSA, QAnon, and other effective social media campaigns to juice MAGA support. He promised to bail out TikTok, the only company that wasn't run by an American oligarch, while Biden was threatening to run them out of business. He rallied his base voters while liberals embarked upon the worst internal voter suppression campaign since 1968. And he did it all as fascist tendencies in the US were cresting.

Harris wasn't running a winnable campaign. She was struggling (badly) to bail out a floundering Biden debacle.

If we don’t abolish this system we’re all going to die.

Everyone dies eventually. But this government seems intent on accelerating things.

[-] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And the fact is that you tell people this, verifiable fact, and they get mad and stick fingers in their ears. They really want to lose.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I remember debates on Reddit. I kept pointing out that the official inflation figures fail to measure the pain people were figuring. But I just got downvoted to Hell by a bunch of troglodytes mindlessly parroting the CPI figures, as if that was the only thing that matters.

There is a severe strain of Orwellian magical thinking among liberals. Speak no evil, see no evil, hear no evil. Ignore all bad news and try to give your way to victory.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Trump only got 49.9% of the vote. He has never been popular, even by capitalizing on disgust with liberals. It really wasn't his election to lose, he's not actually a strong candidate. He won by playing against an opponent that doesn't want to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No matter how it might appear, the DNC didn't fucking throw the election. Jesus Christ, who upvotes this shit?

Terminally online leftists need to get out and touch grass. No party will ever pander to you because not only is your bloc essentially nonexistent in the US, but you literally have no fucking idea how any of this shit actually works in real life.

If you think that the Democratic party is losing elections on purpose as a "fuck you" to voters, you are delusionally stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Have the republicans even bothered to give a name for 2028?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

The fact that they've been memeing about Trump having a third term tells you how excited they are about their actual prospects.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Let Greg Abbot run so the right can have an aneurysm about DEI policies while having a dude in a wheelchair lead their country.

They already have a dementia patient doing it. Why not another disabled person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org 2 points 1 week ago

"Leftists" that were saying this knowingly support trump. They're accelrrationist who want conditions to get so bad that their ideas actually seem good.

Harris was a good candidate her platform was progressive and pragmatic. There was very very little to complain about with her. Thats why the right and "left" had to work extra hard to undermine her. Look at how hard all the .ml on this site were working pre election to convince people not to vote. It was insane, any post that was positive about biden or Harris of waltz was met with a barrage of insane accusation and misinfo.

But i dont think the left undermining dems was a deciding factor. I think it was rights pro trump narrative that was way to strong. Trump dominated every media space. If you were in male spaces pro trump quips were fucking everywhere you'd be watching a YouTuber who was non political for 10years then suddenly he would say something like "but trumps economy was damn good" or something about biden beinf asleep at the wheel. That stuff influences voters more than political ads and old media celebs.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
66 points (92.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38309 readers
782 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS