54

Snip:

Krapivnik detailed Russian contributions, noting the delivery of aircraft and reestablishment of Iran’s air defense networks.

“Russia came back, built a reintegrated system, and over the last six months trained up Su-35 pilots and delivered Su-35 fighters — which outrange, by the way, the F-35s, even though it’s a generation 4++ fighter versus the generation 5 fighter that the F-35 represents.”

Chinese contributions, he explained, include high-resolution radar and satellite-linked early warning systems.

“The Chinese are bringing in their integrated radar systems, which include very tight-beamed, low-wavelength sections that can pick up — integrated with the satellite systems — anything within, I think, 500 to 600 kilometers outside of Iran. So anything that the US or Israel is launching is already being picked up and gives them enough time to start reacting to it.”

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

he's a psy-op to make us expect Iran to win instantly then to be crushed if it doesn't

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 27 points 17 hours ago

I hope he's right. I hope Iran is able to defend itself and it's people and cause real damage to the burger Reich.

I am sick and tired of the only way to defeat America involving being able to endure unfathomable hardship until the yanks give up and go home, I want the yanks to be afraid, humiliated and to suffer for a change.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 12 hours ago

USA was absolutely humiliated when after "the biggest naval operation since WW2" against a small and poor country not having navy and airforce they had to retreat without fulfilling any objective, then proposed concessions for lifting the blockade and heard basically "buzz off" in answer. But they didn't had visible, material losses which would be proof for even most illiterate liberal to see.

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 22 points 15 hours ago

The houthis did that but everyone simply said 'We're too nice! We could've killed them all!', never mind that the houthis achieved their objectives and we failed ours

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 25 points 18 hours ago

He cited historical examples of successful radar-guided defense: “Which is, by the way, how the Serbs took out several American aircraft — B-1s. They put circles around of people with radios, and they visually saw them coming in because they kept using the same flight corridor. ‘Because they’re invisible.’ Well, no, they’re not. With the radios that communicated back, they got taken out with an S-300 or an S-200 system because they were able to lock on to them almost point blank.”

Gee wiz, the stuff you don't hear about in the news. I do firmly believe US forces are going to get humbled in a major way, and I believed this before these upgrades. I hope Trump just does his usual bravado and claims victory... But if they go at Iran, I think it'll result in the rapid decline of the US hegemon.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 13 hours ago

china also providing an alternate gps system

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

@MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net

Is this just wishful thinking? It seems potentially plausible, but maybe the ambiguity is part of the strategy?

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

news

24619 readers
557 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS