I hope he's right. I hope Iran is able to defend itself and it's people and cause real damage to the burger Reich.
I am sick and tired of the only way to defeat America involving being able to endure unfathomable hardship until the yanks give up and go home, I want the yanks to be afraid, humiliated and to suffer for a change.
The houthis did that but everyone simply said 'We're too nice! We could've killed them all!', never mind that the houthis achieved their objectives and we failed ours
Unfortunately they had to endure years of bombing and famine to get to that point.
USA was absolutely humiliated when after "the biggest naval operation since WW2" against a small and poor country not having navy and airforce they had to retreat without fulfilling any objective, then proposed concessions for lifting the blockade and heard basically "buzz off" in answer. But they didn't had visible, material losses which would be proof for even most illiterate liberal to see.
He cited historical examples of successful radar-guided defense: “Which is, by the way, how the Serbs took out several American aircraft — B-1s. They put circles around of people with radios, and they visually saw them coming in because they kept using the same flight corridor. ‘Because they’re invisible.’ Well, no, they’re not. With the radios that communicated back, they got taken out with an S-300 or an S-200 system because they were able to lock on to them almost point blank.”
Gee wiz, the stuff you don't hear about in the news. I do firmly believe US forces are going to get humbled in a major way, and I believed this before these upgrades. I hope Trump just does his usual bravado and claims victory... But if they go at Iran, I think it'll result in the rapid decline of the US hegemon.
Gee wiz, the stuff you don't hear about in the news.
Because it never happened. No B-1B bombers have been lost in combat. The whole article is an elaborate work of fiction. To actually explain why it's all wrong would require hours of writing because of the sheer amount factually incorrect statements.
What the "analysist" is trying to explain is that an F-117 stealth aircraft was shot down over Serbia by an S-125/SA-3 surface to air missile system. For context the F-117 didn't even have a functional radio antenna on missions, no radar, no radar warning receiver, no electronic countermeasures/jamming, no air to air ability. The F-117 was essentially a manned reusable "stealth cruise missile" that relied completely on other aircraft for escort and support, and flew in and out on a pre planned flight path, a vulnerability that could be exploited if you knew the flight path. Which is how the Serbs shot it down, and what this guy is trying to explain. Modern 5th generation stealth aircraft like the F-35 are completely different to the F-117, full of advanced sensors and equipment, designed to geolocate hostile radars/emitters, jam them and employ weapons on them. And obviously a functional radar, and now very advanced datalink. Far, far superior to the F-117, which had none of that. Another important factor is the number of aircraft, only 59 combat capable F-117s were ever built. The US and Israel have over 100 5th generation stealth fighters in the Middle East or on their way to the Middle East, 90 F-35s and 12 F-22s. There is no historical parallel for what such a force is capable of if used fully. The capabilities and number of stealth planes are far greater than anything which has ever been employed previously.
And this is just one point on the article.
Well, there ya go. I'll continue to wish cast that the death machines will get swatted out of the sky. I won't hold my breath though.
Is this just wishful thinking? It seems potentially plausible, but maybe the ambiguity is part of the strategy?
Fiction bordering on delusion. Even if it was true, the Su-35 is inferior to the F-35 and F-22, and token numbers of Su-35s and Chinese "anti stealth radars" are not going to stop a combined force of over 100 US and Israeli stealth 5th generation aircraft integrated with all the intelligence, systems and firepower that the US can bring.
The whole article is an elaborate work of fiction. No B-1B bombers have been shot down. China has zero interest in buying Russian military equipment anymore after their last buy of S-400 and Su-35 buys, China has surpassed this Russian equipment, the HQ-9C and J-16 are far ahead respectively. Trying to use a MANPAD to shoot down a fighter jet is videogame logic.
he's a psy-op to make us expect Iran to win instantly then to be crushed if it doesn't
china also providing an alternate gps system
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.