92
seriously (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

next time I hear "there is just too many (brown) people" i swear

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

Not saying that the general point of corporations doing more harm than people is wrong. Just that if you think that the corporation is just one person, I've got a bridge to sell you.

[-] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

United Healthcare's stock is down 60% since the incident. United Healthcares board and new CEOs lowered the rejection rate of patients out of fear as well. Say what you want about the morality of what was done. The efficacy speaks for itself

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

The efficacy lasted for all of a month before returning to where it had been before.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So, UHC stock was up around 600, dropped to a bit over 200, and is lately around 300. So like ¾ of the drop is still there in linear terms, or something like ⅔ in logarithmic terms.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

That's true, and my bad for implying otherwise.

But I also think much more critically, they're back to denying coverage exactly the way they were before Thompson died.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

I have no knowledge to refute that latter point, and I am inclined to think it is very likely true.

[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

if that continues to happen, trust me, eventually none of these fuckers will be left in line.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Kemp is alive and governing Georgia as far as I know but I'm happy to be corrected if that's wrong. You may be thinking of Brian Thompson who involuntarily resigned his position as the CEO of UnitedHealthcare on a NYC sidewalk.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ah damn, you right. Should have Googled it. Too many Brian's in the news, lol. Got the wires crossed.

Editing to fix.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You did have my hopes up for a moment.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yup. After 9/11 for a while it seemed every week or two the news would report that "The leader of Al Qaeda" had just been killed or captured. Not a false statement, yet it happened again the next week.

[-] meejle@piefed.world 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe we should assign these fuckers playing cards like Bush did 👀

[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

Their HP definitely went down. And, anecdotally, I heard from a pharmacist friend that they were approving claims like nobody's business for the next day or so

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

... So kill the entire board.

That'd probably make a more uh, substantial material impact on their bottom line.

Oh, they keep doing evil shit with a new board?

... repeat.

Or, I guess you can just either ... well, either try to run away and hide, pray to the normalcy bias gods that one of these days the legal systems they own will do something against them, or just resign yourself to a kind of smug, self defeating moral solace in being doomed, but being right while being doomed.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Which one of those things are you doing?

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There is also a societal dependance on some of the status quo. The bigger issue is how hard they actively resist the change. A lot of places still rely on trucking at a minimum to fill the groccery store with food wrapped in plastic, most of which is powered or made by fossil fuels. We need to electrify and diversifying but they cling to oil and have way too much power in governmental decisions to prevent or reverse any reduction in dependance for their products.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago

The way in which Luigi was arrested is part of their safety checks. A way to motivate working class to turn people in, without paying them. I generally thought reward money worked.

I learned it did not work from a podcast that no longer exists. Michael Bazzel’s OSINT podcast talked about it within the context of people who used OSINT to find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works. (Podcast doesn’t exist any more, the copies of the casts went away with the podcast.). Sadly, there’s no replacement for this type of news and info condensed down into one place. It’s also a niche area of information, not followed by many.

Those McDonald's workers were not paid for turning Luigi in. But they thought they would be.

Even so, look at the bigger picture. How many Luigi’s have there been since 1981?

Most people avoid confrontation, spending most of their days sitting in a chair or lying down, and thinking/hoping/wishing a white knight is going to rescue them from their situation. It’s one reason why so many people exist in bad relationships (1 or a chain of them). Because they think that other person is going to rescue them from their sad days of avoiding confrontation while sitting in a chair or lying down, most of the day for most of their days. Hoping. But never doing. Thinking about doing. Maybe spouting off on the internet about doing. But never doing.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works

How does it actually work?

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Generally? It doesn't.

See making the call to tip off the cops makes you eligible for the reward. If you called the correct tip/reward phone number. So that's the first road block.

Even then, you aren't automatically getting the reward. No. There are still hoops to jump through.

As a note these additional hoops also apply when there isn't a specific phone number.

According to the FBI's website, I'd link but I'm on my phone, someone (an agent, a prosecutor, etc) has to put your name forward in a nomination package.

This is then reviewed by the FBI and other agencies, it's kind of vague.

Anyway these agencies decide if you get a reward and what percentage.

And none of this can start until after a conviction is secured.

[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago

Kind of. It's the system they operate under, capitalism.

Get rid of those specific people and you would have others people take their place.

However, not to say that it isn't worthwhile to also bust out the guillotines

[-] REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So you're saying me taking out some replaceable oil execs is going to make people have less demand for oil and everything that comes from it?

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

But there isn't a "demand" at least not as much as years ago. We are trying to switch to renewables but the oil execs keep killing the renewable progress. The horse fucker in the white house won't let us move on. He kills wind and solar and forces the coal plants to stay open.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And that horse fucker won more votes than Kamala.

There's a whole party where resistance to green tech is one of the items of faith, hundreds of millions of people. Not just a handful of oil execs. (And yknow, the millions who still use gasoline in their cars etc.)

Edit: That's not to mention all those who like to fly places.

[-] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 3 points 2 months ago

someone needs to mangione them

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Still wrong, it's capitalism. Without them, there would be different people in the same position. Hate the game, not the player. Well, hate the game and the player but don't expect change from exchanging the player

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They aren't talking about expecting change. They are talking about demanding change at gunpoint, and honestly I can't say I'm entirely opposed.

These people are completely unaffected by the law or any other form of consequences. They have removed our capability to peacefully take action, but the less-peaceful option is always there and there are legions more of us.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

What's your best, longest-lived example of a society without capitalism? Do you have any?

By capitalism, I mean

"private individuals or companies that own and control businesses and property", the simplest definition of capitalism

[-] hobovision@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Capitalism was literally invented in the last few hundred years.

[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

any socialist society will be inherently disadvantaged by the fact that the global hegemon, the USA, is hellbent on destroying them. so, given that, maybe the soviet union? china? they certainly aren't perfect, soviet union especially, but any future socialist project can (and should) learn from their successes and mistakes

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

You have mercantilism and other forms of private business without capitalism. A yeoman making something and selling it isn't capitalism.

Your definition is intentionally bad because you do in fact have to separate capitalism from just the very generic concept of private enterprise.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Tell me you've never studied history pre-1800 without telling me you've never studied history pre-1800.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Tell me you don't have a clue without telling me you don't have a clue

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

If you want actual examples, almost all societies before 1800 we're not capitalist. Feudal society wasn't capitalist, neither was Roman society. Hunter gather society by most accounts was a form of primitive communism, and that is the vast majority of human history.

[-] artifex@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

I honestly have to wonder at what point people will collectively say "why the hell are we letting them do this" ? Not sure what happens after that, but it seems like it must have to happen at some point, right? Right?

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

Never underestimate the power of inertia. Some people live their entire lives on it.

[-] SyrupSplashin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I would get banned on Reddit if I said what I wanted to say about this situation, would I get banned here too?

[-] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ok, but can we put AI in it somehow?

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Recycling is a con to make you feel guilty and let Chevron off the hook.

[-] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Had a few seconds where I thought "Wired" was referring to the tech magazine and wondered what "Tired" is, who would choose name for their magazine or whatever?

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

TIRED: A magazine for millenials and Gen X

[-] r1veRRR@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

Yes, if we just shoot the CEOs, the customers will magically stop wanting fast fashion, fast food, waste amounts of cheap meat, cheap and new electronics every year....

I don't disagree that it would have a positive effect, but I hate the overly reductive takes on systems being completely disconnected from the people. We need to realize that our (western) life style is simply not sustainable, capitalism or not. That requires serious changes for everyone, not just the "rich".

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

So if we kill 90 oil executives we stop using oil?

[-] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

We stop the oil propaganda. Without that, we do gradually stop using oil, because the alternatives are

  • cheaper
  • easier to obtain
  • do not need dependency on Russia/middle east, which are both politically toxic
[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

We stop the oil propaganda

How? Will these 90 people not just be replaced?

[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh probably. Luckily it's also pretty easy to make new fire too though.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 months ago

Knowing their names doesn't matter, you cannot make things illegal for specific people nor would that help. You have to write and pass legislature to make it stop, and that's why we're at a fucking standstill on everything: a large majority don't believe in legislature as a basic concept or solution.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
92 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11412 readers
96 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS