10

A friend and I are arguing over ghosts.

I think it’s akin to astrology, homeopathy and palm reading. He says there’s “convincing “ evidence for its existence. He also took up company time to make a meme to illustrate our relative positions. (See image)

(To be fair, I’m also on the clock right now)

What do you think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Science has never in the history of science reliably shown a single interaction between physical entities and any sort of non-physical force. The only way ghosts could be real is if you redefined the term “ghost” to the point of breaking, like saying that the memory of a person is a ghost.

Plus, it fails the smell test in a million ways. What makes a ghost exist? Why aren’t we positively lousy with ghosts? Are there rules? What would they be and what mechanism is there to both quantify and effect them? Why do ghosts follow the rotation and revolution of the earth but otherwise aren’t physically bound? How can one have any sort of cognition? If a ghost does, how can it perceive anything without intercepting photons or other physical phenomena? If there are ghosts and somehow they have cognition and perception, are we obligated to leave Netflix on when we leave for work?

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Technically, the moment science would show an interaction between physical entities and something else, that something else would immediately be classified as a physical entity. In a very real sense, the discovery of radioactivity involved physical entities being found to interact with an as-yet unknown, invisible, intangible force.

If ghosts existed, the same would happen as with radioactivity. They would be researched, hypotheses on their nature would be tested, and a scientific theory would arise, and then they would be a part of the "physical world" too. And then all the mystics would be bored with ghosts because they are just incorporeal noospheric echoes of old people, as boring as neurology or biochemistry or stellar fusion.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

If a bunch of people were going around saying I got this weird burn on my skin after holding this rock for a while, scientists would have discovered radioactivity a lot sooner.

There are a bunch of people going around claiming to have interacted with ghosts, and we've got bupkis.

[-] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

That reminds me of this meme:

Hypothetical chart comparing the number of cameras to the number of sightings of both Bigfoot and Giant Squid. Bigfoot sightings do not increase with more cameras.

I found it here after an internet search trying to find it again, but I'm not sure if it is the original source:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Cryptozoology/comments/1c7btq9/ill_just_leave_this_here/

[-] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

The indigenous Australians, the Mirarr people, identified an area in Northern Australia as sickness country which was very coincident with a high concentration of uranium.

They just avoided the area instead of poking it

https://d28rz98at9flks.cloudfront.net/145214/145214_00_0.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Science has never in the history of science reliably shown a single interaction between physical entities and any sort of non-physical force.

Fucking magnets,

How do they work?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Magnetism is a physical force, like gravity. Measurable and consistent.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You keep saying "physical force"...

That's not a real term in physics.

The only possible explanation, is you mean any force that is already explained by physics, is that what you mean?

Because that would be the same as insisting we know everything, which no one who knows anything about physics would ever try to claim.

So...

What exactly do you mean when you keep saying "physical forces"?

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

One of the definitions of "physical" in the American Heritage Dictionary is:

Of or relating to matter and energy or the sciences dealing with them, especially physics.

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I mean there’s no way to go from immeasurable to measurable except in scale, and anywhere north of quantum scale, physics has been reliably predictable and measurable. Ghosts’ purported impact is on a scale well above that which is unexplained.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Iunnrais@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I think you could rationally explore ghosts in the “radically redefining” them arena. Ghosts could rationally exist as an artifact of your mind, and saying that is not the same thing as saying they don’t exist. Hallucinations exist. They aren’t real, but they exist. Ghosts could rationally exist in the exactly same way, as processes in our own heads. It’s when you start saying they interact with the world in a way outside people’s heads that you can’t really reconcile.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm now a manager, but I work in contract security, and have been in more buildings that were supposedly haunted than I care to count. Including buildings that have numerous stories of freaky shit happening.

Doors closing "randomly" or very-not-randomly. Spaces suddenly getting cold. puddles showing up in bathrooms that someone supposedly drowned in. Stairwells that sound like people walking down them at specific times of night.

odd noises. Freaky noises.

I have never once been in a building where I could not identify a perfectly natural cause. Here's a few incidents off the top of my mind that I remember very specifically. There are some few commonalities to people who see ghosts. or demons, or any other supernatural entity.

  1. they're incurious and don't care to find out what really happened.
  2. they're frequently (usually?) tired or otherwise in an altered state of mind. or incredibly bored.
  3. They already believe in supernatural things.... and what they see generally conforms to their world view.

Ghost stories are perpetuated by the credulous, who find things that are decidedly weird, and then stop looking any further. or they hear a story- suicides, murders, etc- and attribute every weird little thing to that.

or they're told by straight up liars and ran with by people who would run with scissors and untied shoes. a lot of times, it's started by people who have an inability to admit they don't know something.

Regardless, if ghosts were real. if they were common, and if they interacted with the natural world, then we would have actual, tangible evidence for their existence. You'd be able to point at one and say 'aha! a ghost!' that doesn't happen.

These are just some of the examples of things I've heard about and found to be otherwise.

One example was a guy who claimed ghosts were always going around closing every fire door every night at 23:00. On the dot. Every night.

And yeah. doors were being closed as described. Guess what? All the doors had one thing in common.

They were being held open by magnetic door holders. they're fire doors. Building code here requires that they be self-closing in the event of a fire alarm to prevent the spread of fire. But that's really rather inconvenient in long hallways where people don't want to be opening big heavy doors everytime they're bringing a cart of shit through.

Thus, the electromagnetic door holders that turn off whenever a fire alarm goes off.

Well. if you guessed that the fire system had been programmed to turn off all the door holders at 23:00 each night, just long enough to let any being held open close... you'd be right. All it took to verify that was to send a five minute email to the facility engineer, who spent all of ten minutes checking settings on the fire alarm system and turned it off.

Another example of doorholder mayhem is one in which the doorholders were slowly going bad.

This was when I was a manager, and I was doing a sort of covert investigation where I go in and have them train me on the site. there were problems.

those problems all stemmed from a fundamental lack of curiosity. Which stemmed from a fervent belief in the supernatural. Voices in spaces that are supposed to be empty? they weren't teenagers smoking dope, it was spirits.

One example of spirits that loved to fuck with him? one hallway had firedoors that sectioned off a t-shaped hallway, that was lined with businesses (mostly offices.) he was supposed to go down the hallway, checking and locking all the doors and generally making sure everything was in good order. the firedoor in the middle of the hallway, kept closing on him.

Rather than looking into what the issue was, he wrote it off as demons fucking with him, specifically.

The reality was that the doorhoder was going bad (probably had been for a long time. as that happens their holding power gets weaker. this door holder's holding power was just strong enough to hold the door when it was static, but any kind of touch or slight pressure was enough for it to close.

Including changes in the air pressure as you walked past. When I pointed this out to him. Well. Lets just say he's no some other company's problem.

another example is voices in unusual places

Guess what? walls be thin, yo.

Frequently, office buildings with multiple tenants are remodeled in strange ways. especially if they're older- things get partitioned weierd. spaces get remodeled and lighting and power doesn't be as you'd expect.

In any case, in this particular building, the idiot in question didn't realize that the very short custodial closet didn't go all the way "back" from the hall- she should have, though. She'd also never gone into the space that wrapped around the maintenance closet to run beside the space that she kept hearing voices in "that shouldn't be there!"

Those voices were caused by people working late.

my personal favorite, ghost steps coming down stairs.

this particular building is historic- that is to say, it was a tire warehouse built in the 1890s. It's really quite a lovely building. Giant limestone block foundation, old tan brick. cedar beam construction.

one of two stairwells that hit ever floor has fire sprinkler stand pipes running through each landing. not surprising, considering. the building is old. It's drafty as fuck. And at night, in order to save energy, because it literally predates central air, they turn the system off at night (or run it to a lower set point.)

This results in a fairly consistent rate at which it cools off. the fire stand pipes cool off at a different rate, though, and clunk against the landings the pass through. They do so in a way that sounds like someone walking down the stairs.

Incurious guards just wrote it off as some ghost or something, but all of the long term tenants will tell a story about how there was a guy that died from a tractor tire falling on him. (didn't happen, by the way. Though numerous people did die here. mostly jumpers.)

Radiators make some creepy noises.

I mean. Seriously. gurrgle gurrgle. burble burble. Tickety tick.

still not ghosts.

big cats sound like screaming women.yeap. okay, need to clarify, I mean, our local lynxes and bobcats, as well as the occasional mountain lion passing through.

If you ever saw Annihilation, with the "help me" bear. yeah. it's like that. Randomly. Out of the dark woods. and not coherent words so much as screams. (that account happened to border a large statepark that had some cats living in it.)

Sudden changes of temperature

So, most office building's HVACs work on positive pressure. This way, when a door gets opened, the hot air goes out rather than the cold air coming in. (or cold air going out, hot air coming in. Depends on where you are and the season.)

for whatever reason, one of the office spaces just had massive open vents (I personally suspect this was a remodel that got left in the wall. the vent just connected the main lobby/entryway to the space (above a plenum ceiling)

Another feature of building HVAC systems are the airlock doors as you come and go. Guess what happens when you open both airlock doors and have a window you're not supposed to have open, open?

All your air rushes out, getting replaced by cold air.

::: spoiler Puddles in Bathrooms Okay. so, water goes from high places to low places, and tends to follow the 'easiest' path, even if its somewhat convoluted. If you have an inexplicable puddle somewhere, you have a water leak somewhere.

what you don't have is some kind of poltergeist taking a bath. Doesn't matter if a person committed suicide in the bathroom, or rather, if you're told that's what happened. (it's not.)

Turns out that the rooftop had a leak, and that was travelling down through 8 floors to show up in a bathroom. because that's where the pipes the water was following kinda sorta came out.

lso, which requirements in terms of species are there for a haunting to commence? Can a horse become a ghost? What about a gorilla? Or a Neanderthal? Seems weird that only homo sapients ge

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

As a reasonable person, I can admit that it's always "possible" that ghosts exist. Meaning, that I am not 100% positive that they don't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disregardable@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

I mean, it sounds like your friend genuinely doesn't understand the scientific method. That doesn't necessarily make them unreasonable. It just means they had a sub-standard science education.

[-] yizus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He’s wishy washy on the scientific method, not because he doesn’t understand it but because he believes it’s wrong (or at least incomplete)

We’ve spoken about this on several occasions and either his arguments make no sense or I’m genuinely too dumb to get them.

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] 1dalm@lemmings.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's not important that you believe in ghosts. It's only important that they believe in themselves.

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 1 week ago

We have built systems that have detected:

  • Black holes which collided 2000000000 lightyears away
  • single photons
  • neutrinos, particles that can pass through lightyears of lead
  • concentrations of chemicals rated in picograms (0.000000000001g) per litre
  • vibrations rated at 1/1000000 of a g

We have come into a world where people carry around, nearly 24/7, devices capable of recording high definition video, measuring variances in light, magnetism, vibration, storing time correlated data and even processing over it with enough proficiency to put digital bunny ears or makeup on you in real time.

Despite all this, we have no evidence and no mechanism by which we even might expect ghosts could exist. It's reasonable to say you can't be 100% certain they don't exist, but it is also wildly unreasonable to say they do.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah but did those scientists ever point the James Webb Telescope at that creepy house at the end of my street?

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I knew an athiest who believed in ghosts. no idea how he squared that.

[-] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't you just need to believe in a soul? And haven't philosophers been pondering that in various ways for a long time?

I think this post on another thread nails the core of the issue for me and it's pretty independent of religion (since I think potential mechanisms could be independent of religion):

If a bunch of people were going around saying I got this weird burn on my skin after holding this rock for a while, scientists would have discovered radioactivity a lot sooner.

There are a bunch of people going around claiming to have interacted with ghosts, and we've got bupkis.

https://fedia.io/m/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world/t/3507873/-/comment/14195254

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Its wierd to me when someone does not believe in god because of no evidence but will believe in ghosts, spirits, elves, fairies, aliens, magic, etc with no evidence. To me atheism is not believing in the supernatural at all be it god or the philosphers stone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

He says there’s “convincing “ evidence for its existence.

Big if true. He should send that to you instead of making memes.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The only evidence is anecdotal, there just happens to be a lot of it.

So no, I'd say it's unreasonable to believe in ghosts. (Though I do love ghost stories and folklore.)

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

If ghosts existed it'd be the biggest fucking news and all research would focus on it. Proof of an afterlife? Another universe beyond this one? We'd go there instead of space. Elon would want to set up a colony.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The bar for “convincing” is very low when you want to believe.

[-] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

all it takes is some freaky shit sometimes. People forget that a lot happens in the world that deviates from their baseline and that it isn’t always paranormal.

[-] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

What type are we talking about? Sexy?

Or scary?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The more you know the less stuff you're comfortable ruling out.

There's nothing that disproves ghosts, but there's nothing that proves them either.

You could have said "souls" instead, because that's just another word for consciousness. But it doesn't work for ghosts

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

not proof, no. but it is evidence.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago

There's nothing to disprove ghosts because there's no real definition of what a ghost is.

If someone gives me a real unambiguous agreed upon definition of what a ghost is, I'll explain why we know they don't exist.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If ghosts were real, then I can think of a few people throughout history who would have been swarmed by them. Adolf Hitler would have approximately 13 million spirits haunting him by the end. Something like 100,000,000,000 humans have ever lived, and somehow all the ghosts are from culturally relevant time frames? For all the US civil war ghosts people have seen, you'd think there'd be orders of magnitude more native Americans haunting this place. Did the European colonists just make sure to let the Indigenous peoples finish all their business before hunting them to near extinction?

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Does your friend consider themselves on the left or the right side of the graph?

Any graph like that where it puts their own beliefs as 'smart' and others beliefs as 'dumb' is inherently a pretty useless graph. Graph says them smart, you dumb. Does the graph not convince you? LOL.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think it's fine if people believe in ghosts and spiritual stuff. My wife believes in ghosts, genuinely and fervently. I don't really care to battle her on this because regardless of what she believes and what I believe we ultimately end up doing the same thing in the end - nothing. I think it's a bit childish, but it's no more or less unreasonable than faith in a god or a higher power and people will fight you over that.

I think the delineating factor is how much belief in ghosts or the supernatural play into your decision making and your worldview.

If a person believes ghosts are real, but never really act on that belief, it's harmless.

if a person believes ghosts are real and alter their behavior in meaningful ways as a result, it's maladaptive.

For example, say you hear a creaking noise in the middle of the night that startles you awake. Person A, Person B and Person C each check to ensure there's no intruder in the house and determine that all the doors and windows are still locked and there are no signs of forced entry.

Person A comes to the conclusion that it was just the sound of the wood joists expanding or contracting as the temperature fluctuates and goes back to bed.

Person B comes to the conclusion that the sound could have only been produced by a ghost and therefore their house must be haunted, and so they call an emergency priest to come exorcise the house with holy water and they stay up all night clutching charms and wards to fend off spirits.

Person C comes to the conclusion that the sound could have only been produced by a ghost, says a quick (10 second) prayer for protection/guidance for the lost spirit and then goes back to sleep.

You can see how Person A and Person C have conflicting views about the origin of the sound, one which relates to scientific explanations for real phenomena and the other that delves into spirituality and faith to explain it. Regardless, they are both able to resume their normal behaviors (sleeping) afterward, while Person B shares the same view of the origin of the sound as person C, but their view is extremely disruptive and illogical. Their belief in ghosts requires them to take extreme measures to feel protected against them, but there is no evidence that anything bad would have happened as a result if they had chosen to do nothing instead. Nor would there have been a guarantee that something bad would not have happened anyway if they did all of the "proper" things to remain safe from ghosts.

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No. It's unreasonable. Tell your friend that I specifically said he's a twat

[-] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Ghosts are real but only jedi masters (like the one in the meme) can see them. Unfortunately, jedi masters are not real.

[-] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Dude just thinks he's special. There would be ANY evidence by now. The superiority of the meme is laughable. Your friend is a fool.

[-] doug@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

It’s fun to think up thought experiments that explain away the reasons we can’t prove they exist.

Time isn’t linear, we’re just limited to experiencing it that way while we’re alive.

After we die, we experience time differently; in an impossible-to-describe way, but is akin to a book with limitless pages. Your existence is a bookmark in this book, and dying makes you lose your place.

It is possible to re-find your place, but with unfathomable access to unfathomable histories and futures, there is a near-infinite choice of other events and timelines for a ghost to visit and observe and experience.

Coupled with that, there are laws— some sort of physical laws, not arbitrary— to visiting the pages of this book, in that they can only be done in areas that do not cause pages before or after to change dramatically. A ghost is a spec of ink on the page; it cannot write letters, words, or sentences. If anything like this were ever done, we would never know as our minds would simply accept the memory as fact without knowing, or delete the memory of a ghost the way we space out driving on a highway or having to look at our watch a second time.

Lastly, our senses are all on varying spectrums; some of us able to see, hear, smell, experience things others cannot. One of our senses is a sense of time. Some people’s sense of time operates on a scope of a wider caliber than others, experiencing things others cannot, which is why some of us may have experienced ghosts while others haven’t.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
10 points (67.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46997 readers
70 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS