Charlie Kirk absolutely DESTROYS 17 year old with FACTS and REASON
OBLITERATES 1-year-old with HIDING behind HANDS
"Grown Man With Prepared Talking Points Is Better At Debating Than A Child Who Was Just Kinda There"
Wait.
Is his face shopped to be smaller? I can't tell anymore.
No, his face was obviously shopped bigger
lil' biiiiiiiiits
can't believe he's bragging about an argument he had with a literal child
It's bad enough when student 'conservatives' play this "I am the master debater" game (with the most bad-faith approach, and without any understanding of real debate) but, when they're in their thirties, it's even more pathetic.
At least it's admitting that they know their beliefs are dogshit because the only way they can argue for them is to set up a point system where if you point out what they're saying is fucking stupid it means they win.
Two types of people who do this:
Serial killers
Conservatives
I can. These people have no shame.
Not to talk shit about the kid but he legit looks like he's maybe 15 at most.
Look how dead his eyes are. I'd probably look like that, too, if the only job I could get was arguing with children on YouTube.
They basically admit they can't win an argument against a grown adult.
Do 17 year olds still even do that haircut?
That's the haircut you get by not getting a haircut so some of them must.
And I'm not talking shit that's what my hair looked like until it all started falling out.
Losing debates against 19 year old undergraduates and deciding to take it down a notch. middle school auditorium when?
Sponsored • Turning Point USA
Imagine how unstoppable our ideas would be if it was the left running 24/7 propaganda forced directly to your eyeballs instead of the right.
One of the few things that keeps the bloomer in me alive is the fact that they can barely keep up their chirade even with the media atmosphere structurally rigged in their favor and perpetually exerting influence on every social sphere.
That's a really good point they are the most privellaged people on the planet with a literala billion dollar infrastructure to make their shitty beliefs more palatable and widely accepted and they still whine abaout how unfair life is to them all the time.
Imagine if they ever faced actual hardship or oppression.
Contrary to what American liberals would have you believe, it requires a lot of effort to convince the working masses to reject the logical conclusions that follow from existing in material reality.
How many people would side with bourgeois interests without bourgeois media being practically unavoidable? I suspect it would more closely mirror actual class divisions in a "true neutral" environment (assuming that could ever exist.)
Decades after Bennington Shabidabadoo ran this bit into the ground, Charles Tiberius Kirk is here to hit that horse-skeleton with his trusty stick!
I hope his face remains that size while his body just keeps growing
I watched one of these by accident and I remember Charlie told a self-described anarchist to go become Amish.
People still watch these? This is reactionary slop from nearly 10 years ago. I thought they all moved on to harder stuff like Qanon and wild conspiracies about HRT drugs in tap water
Ahh yes rhe Amish famous for not having a system with unjustified hierarchys
Just asks their child brid...... I mean wives.
So embarrassing
Puffy Justin Trudeau
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
