81
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Pennsylvania senator dismissed the demand for further investigation as “moot.”

Senator John Fetterman appeared not to understand why Democrats want to investigate the deadly strike that killed dozens of Iranian children.

During an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Wednesday night, Fetterman was asked to explain why he hadn’t signed onto a letter from Senate Democrats that questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the February 28 strike on Shajarah Tayyebeh, a girls’ primary school miles from Tehran. The strike killed 175 people, many of them young girls.

“Well, because we all agree that it’s a tragedy having the school hit, and we all agree now for an investigation,” Fetterman said. “What I don’t agree with the rest of my colleagues in the House is that it’s a war of choice, or it’s dumb, or all the things my colleagues have described, you know, this operation. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

Fetterman was referring to a line in the letter describing Donald Trump’s military campaign as “a war of choice without Congressional authorization.” The letter did not describe the war as “dumb.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kirk@startrek.website 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The headline is misquoting him, the full quote is:

“Well, because we all agree that it’s a tragedy having the school hit, and we all agree now for an investigation,” Fetterman said. “What I don’t agree with the rest of my colleagues in the House is that it’s a war of choice, or it’s dumb, or all the things my colleagues have described, you know, this operation. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

Still glaringly stupid, but the headline makes it seem like he's in denial it happened. He didn't say the words ~~"leftist" or~~ "craze"

Edited for accuracy!

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Appreciate this.

Trump's political supporters say and do enough batshit, immoral things that we don't need to be lying just to make our points.

[-] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

bad vibes to John Fetterman but also bad vibes to the journalist who misquoted the title

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He did say the word "leftist". He doesn't say crazed, but he does say:

"The Leftist media seem more angry and talking about the deaths of these dead school girls than they were about Iran killing tens of thousands of their own young people a couple of weeks ago"

The clip is here: https://x.com/Acyn/status/2031906677365358825

All I did was search the rest of the article for the term "leftist" notice it was used, then goto the link the New Republic provided. The question the interviewer is posing is why did all the Senate Democrats signed a letter condemning the US action in Iran except for John Fetterman.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

"We only murdered a little over a hundred school-children in this one attack when their regime murdered over 10,000. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

[-] margaret_erine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

What game are they trying to play here 🤔?

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They don't want to give the full quote where he does use the term "leftist" (but not craze) - PROBABLY because they don't want to platform Fetterman's idea that the media should be doing criticism of other countries actions as much as the American governments actions.

...a point that doesn't really make sense, because the fourth estate in democractic countries are supposed to cover criticism of their own governments more than others.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

This is 100% a click-bait post.

Here's the full interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zE4v--qcPs

Skip the comments, though, unless you enjoy reading bots and spam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

He says that, but then votes against the investigation. Fuck this guy.

[-] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

Can the Democrats sanction and eject this senator? He seems to be a Trumper in disguise.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

~~in disguise~~

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 1orangecat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

This man is among the worst.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

When it comes to Fetterman, I wonder how many people get brain damage and suddenly become more progressive instead of regressive?

I know some people say this is who they suspect he always was, but....

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He had a helluva PR campaign to reform his image. I believed it at first until i finally found a video of someone giving a rundown of his background and his actions began making a lot more sense. Suffice to say i've found him to be an extreme disappointment but because i wasn't in his district and therefore voting for him I never dug into his history or background.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

That same video is what revealed what a shithead he is.

I should keep it saved to share.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Motherfucker should have just been a Trumper. He's as stupid as everyone else in the administration and would fit right in.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Looking back, it's like what the fuck, it was this guy or Dr Oz? Like did Pennsylvania even actually have a choice?

[-] foodandart@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

He was a lot less insufferable before the stroke.

Brain injuries absolutely DO change people.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Unfortunately he wasn't. He was a dick before the stroke he just had an incredible campaign/PR team that managed to successfully spin him as a progressive. I learned about him summarized in this video

23 minutes in i get Ahmaud Arbery vibes when he pulled a gun on a complete stranger.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There's a fan theory about the show King of the Hill.

I think it was season 2 that Peggy Hill went sky diving. The parachute doesn't open, and she seeminly falls to her death. Except then you find out that she survived, and is now in a full body cast.

Fans noticed that before those events she wasn't very aggressive, or stuborn, or stupid. But after the fall, those are the traits that would define her character going forward.

The theory is, the brain damage from the fall changed her. And thats a good in show way of saying "the writers hadn't found her personality yet".

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

They blame the stroke he had just before the 2024 primary for his personality change, but there were clues that this was really him all along. Another excuse I've seen which I find slightly more believable (but only because the groundwork for it was already there) is that he became highly dependent upon social media - and thereby more radicalized - after his stroke prevented him from communicating normally.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

His "brain injury" was indeed caused by a stroke. It was the stroke of a pen, signing off on that big, fat check that someone gave him in exchange for his vote.

[-] heiligerbimbam@lemmy.wtf 7 points 3 weeks ago

I say John Fetterman is an amoralic peice of shit and will go to hell.

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

WHICH ONE OF THE SIX SCHOOL BOMBING STRIKES IN IRAN, FETTERMAN? WHICH FUCKING ONE DOESN'T DESERVE INVESTIGATION?

[-] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

John Fetterman had medically confirmed brain damage.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Fetterman gets off to dead kids.

[-] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I heard he's in the Epstein Files. Release them if you want to try and change my mind.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It must be true, he read it on Facebook guys!

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

His appearance corresponds with his moral and intellectual levels. He would be a great villain in some comedy. LMAO.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If the Democrats were a functioning opposition party, they would have forced Fetterman out when his staffers started reporting his erratic behavior. But Chuck Schumer needs Senators to, "go against him," and thwart any legitimate opposition the party can muster, so we let this brain damaged, mentally ill man occupy one of fhe highest positions of power in the nation.

[-] dotCody@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

What a fuckin 180 this douche canoe did. Must have been that cameo in the Christian bale movie.

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I choose to blame the stroke.

Actual, factual brain damage is no joke, and there was a reason he won the election he was in. He was genuinely not insane/traitorous before his stroke.

The more cynical option is that he was always like this and merely wanted to screw over the leftists of Pennsylvania by running under a D ticket, but frankly I think brain damage from stroke leading to sudden onset fascist sympathies is both more likely (brain damage can have really fucking weird effects) and way funnier in a certain context

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

John Fetterman lives under a bridge and eats any traveller who can't answer his riddles

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

This dude is definitely a pedofile

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Does anyone on any side think this brain-damaged flip-flopper has anything important to say?

[-] bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wish I could go back in time and vote against him in the primary, but he was cool back then flying the weed flag at the state capital. He also ran against Dr Oz, who is worse but I had high hopes for him. Now I just feel betrayed everytime he makes the news. I never felt so ashamed to have given anyone my vote as him.

[-] MercuryGenisus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

"dozens" is a really weird way of spelling "over a hundred".

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Crazy fuck

People who look crazy like this fuckhead shouldn't throw stones.

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

This argues that a number of Democrats are being coerced by Netanyahu's "Israel"'s "kompromat" intel.

https://lemmy.world/post/44104254

I think it's spot-on.

_ /\ _

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have come to the conclusion, after this being the 3rd thing I've seen about the man within the last 30 minutes, that Fetterman is a piece of shit.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I never thought I’d hate a senator more than Manchin.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sinema giving side-eye

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago

This guy has been a major disappointment, but I want to remind everyone, that if Fetterman had t won his election, we'd be listening to Dr Oz run his fraud mouth.

Guys like Manchin and Sinema and Fetterman piss us off, but they contribute to the Democratic seat count, which is really really close right now. In past close party counts, sometimes the majority is only because of a DINO. They may not vote how we'd like, as much as we like, but their registration as Dem means that Dems control the chamber, the investigations, the legislation, etc.

So while he's a pain in the ass, he still has value to the party. Right now, the MAGA majority in the House is so thin, that if only one more Republican resigns effective immediately, the majority will swing to the Dems, BEFORE THE MIDTERMS EVEN HAPPEN.

If I were the Dems, I'd be offering huge rewards to any Republican willing to retire immediately. Want a cushy, high paying gig with a lobbying firm? We can make that happen. MAGA will scream, but who cares? That's always entertaining anyway.

[-] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

He just said killing school children is a leftist conspiracy wtf are you talking about

[-] foxwolf@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago

I guess but isn't Dr. Oz just in a different position within the trump administration now?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

But he's not a Senator.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
81 points (92.6% liked)

politics

29279 readers
999 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS