65
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

I have a friend that married a PoS. At her wedding she told our mutual friend that her now husband hits her. I believe she got married because she was scared of being alone even though we're not old enough for that to be a real concern. A week or more later the mutual friend and I were playing cards at her parent's. The topic of the husband came up and we pushed the topic to this. I said she told us that he hit her. It turns out that they knew but had the belief that there is never a valid reason to get divorced. I shut that shit down right away and surprisingly they sort of agreed.

She divorced him months later.

Point being some people have weird and dangerous beliefs about marriage

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Her husband was worth 4 million. She wanted the money.

That's not speculation, the prosecution showed a financial motive and the jury agreed.

[-] markz@suppo.fi 17 points 3 weeks ago

Not that weird. Usually these types can't shut the fuck about it.

The internet search history from Richins's phone included "what is a lethal.dose.of.fetanayl" and "luxury prisons for the rich America"

Lmao

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

As a defense attorney I would've immediately declared my client mentally disabled and listed the search history as proof.

[-] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Good Lord. Pic of internet searches shown in court.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

"how to tell the police that you totally did it and leave every trace imaginable, for ipohen"

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That would almost be as bad as writing a six page letter detailing all of your attempted witness tampering and accidentally having it found in your jail cell.

Which is a thing she did.

It could only be worse if that letter included instructions to make threats against someone's children.

Oh. It did.

Look up the "Walk the dog" letter. It is one of the most unbelievably damning pieces of evidence you will ever see. The prosecution literally built their entire closing argument around it because it's so bad that they can just discard the rest of their case and still win on that alone.

[-] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Never heard of this case before. Thank you for sharing, for anyone else I think this is a link to the letter mentioned:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23980331-kouri-richins-walk-the-dog-letter/

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

For anyone who needs context, because on its face this is a confusing document, the actual letter was intended to be delivered to her mother. It conscripts said mother into a detailed scheme of witness tampering heavily involving her brother. Kouri concocts a fake history of drug use for her dead husband with numerous details designed to create reasonable doubt and open up the idea that her husband was a habitual fentanyl user, while explaining away the fact that no drugs were found in their home. She also implores her mother to send photos of her nieces to the press as an implicit threat against one of Eric's sisters (Eric's family were pretty firmly in the "She killed him" camp at this point). The large "Walk the dog!" heading, along with other notes throughout, is understood to be an instruction to get out of the house before reading the letter and then to dispose of it somewhere safely.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

How do you be so stupid you think that people are reading the letter you sent from jail over the recipient's shoulder but not before delivery

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. In the letter she tells her mother to have this planned conversation with brother (to fill him in on his part of the cover-up) somewhere away from home because she's worried about her mother's house and phone being bugged. But she didn't think "Hey, maybe I shouldn't leave this highly incriminating document in my jail cell." She is not a smart person, at all.

The wildest part about this case is that she really ought to have gotten away with it. The police absolutely botched the case. Kouri wasn't even charged until something like a year or two after the murder. The initial investigation failed to gather any meaningful evidence, basically just completely shit the bed on everything, overlooked a whole bunch of red flags, and she was free and clear until Eric's family hired a PI to look into it and get charges pressed.

The only reason she got convicted is that she's spectacularly stupid and left a trail of evidence a mile wide, so that even a year or so after the fact it will still possible to easily show that she did it.

[-] tomi000@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago
[-] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Do you mean an iphkne? Common mistake tbf.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

This is why you should always google really funny shit before committing a crime.

"How to not incriminate myself but make the query so funny that it shows up in the court docs"

[-] jwt@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

Big "Can u get pregante" vibes.

[-] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

can youur husban.get pragnet from fentonall.pioiisoneng

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

iPhind. Isn't that from GTA5?

[-] marighost@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

She also searched for her own net worth, which is super embarrassing.

[-] papalonian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's interesting. On the surface one might assume she's just dumb and doesn't understand how to assess her finances, but I wonder if there's more to it; maybe she already knew her net worth (or didn't particularly care), but wanted to know what other people say her net worth is.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ngl, if I had "people googling my net worth" money, I'd check at least once lol

[-] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

She didn't. She was in the hole $1.5M. There's a whole series of fraud cases which are basically her singled-handed personal ponzi scheme of bad loans that are still pending trial.

[-] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What is it with these people? One thing is just never enough. If she had just killed her husband that's fine, if he was just scamming people that's fine, but if you can't stick to one crime at a time honey you're gonna get caught 👁️👄👁️💅🏾

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

She tried to kill him once before and failed, and he not only stayed together but continued to let her get near his food and drink? My guy...

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Some kinks are unhealthy

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe they were Mormons. Their views on marriage are kinda...unique.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

"yeah it's risky but that I can beat that pussy up like Muhammad Ali and drive her wild even after I'm done with her sister so it's a fair trade"

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sex must have been amazing

[-] Aatube@thriv.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

some more quotes from the new york times

Forensic analysis of burner phones used by Ms. Richins showed searches for “women utah prison,” “can cops.uncover deleted.messages iphone,” “if someone is poisned what does it go down on the death certificate as,” “how long does life insurance companies takento.pay” and “what is a lethal.does.of.fetanyl.”

Prosecutors said that weeks earlier, on Valentine’s Day, she had tried to kill him by poisoning his favorite type of sandwich with fentanyl. Mr. Richins became extremely ill that day but recovered after using Benadryl and an EpiPen, charging documents said. Afterward, Ms. Richins asked the housekeeper, Carmen Lauber, for “something stronger,” Ms. Lauber told prosecutors, specifically asking for “the Michael Jackson stuff.”

Ms. Richins’s lawyers argued that Mr. Richins was addicted to painkillers and had asked his wife to buy painkillers for him; they suggested he may have overdosed. They argued Mr. Richins could have purchased the drugs himself, and contended during the trial that there was no evidence that showed how Mr. Richins had ingested the fentanyl. Detective Jeff O’Driscoll, the lead investigator on the case, testified that law enforcement authorities did not find evidence of fentanyl on any glasses or straws in the home.

[-] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Either she doesn't grasp the concept of a burner phone, or I don't.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

Reminds me of "'How to murder your husband' writer sentenced for murdering husband"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61786575

[-] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

At least she didn't name it "How to murder your husband and get away with it".

[-] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Real OJ Simpson "If I did it" vibes.

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Or I Killed Darnell Simmons by the legendary rapper Gun Rack.

[-] Codpiece@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago

Can’t write books without doing some research, I guess?

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Write what you know.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

And of course it happened in Utah - the Florida of the West.

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Defendant’s first name checks out.

(Kouri)

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

what are you trying to say?

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Mormon culture is prevalent in Utah, and for some reason they have a peculiar obsession with weird names and spellings.

[-] JayK117@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh so it's not Erika Kirk... This time

[-] baatliwala@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Widdershins@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Someone who is good with .gifs needs to add the coffee pouring right out his neck.

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The psychology of this case, and other cases like it, is really baffling. The article didn't go into much detail except mentioning the prior attempt, the millions of dollars of life insurance, and her cover story about him being addicted to opioids.

When investigators found those details the picture must have became clear.

What causes one person in a long-term relationship to off the other one? Why not just, you know, do what everyone else does and divorce? I'm sure being a divorcee sucks but it can't be as bad as a convicted aggravated murderer who will live life behind bars

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You assume the relationship was the cause, and that it wasn't just an underlying latent psychopathic person.

Lots psychopaths don't start killing people well into adulthood, and otherwise lead normal lives.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

People tell themselves stories to rationalize everything. Some make sense to most people, some dont. The story this lady told herself to enable her to murder her husband instead of just divorcing him is surely going to sound insane.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Causality is hard at work; as certain as death and taxes.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Needed material for the sequel?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
65 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21143 readers
251 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS