124
They did the thing! (hexbear.net)

soypoint-1 soypoint-2

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 40 points 2 days ago

Genocide and the most lethal military without the drama.

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 44 points 2 days ago

"Why couldn't the left just let us get to a future where we could still continue to ignore genocide?" maybe-later-honey

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 45 points 2 days ago

I do wonder if the US would've still attacked Iran if the democrats were in charge. It might've been more of a 2027/28 kind of conflict rather than early 2026, with more consent manufacturing, so the war would've been just as brutal and bloodthirsty, but all the libs would be proudly parroting talking points from their talking heads as to why murdering people in Iran indiscriminately is actually good for Iranian feminism or something.

[-] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 days ago

They were uncritically believing the thousands of dead protestors in the months leading up to it.

[-] Dr_Pepper@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago

That shit is so crazy to me. People just uncritically saying '30k dead!!!'. The US and Israel have carpet bombed the country for a month and there around 2k dead from it. I'm not trying to minimize the deaths but you think that would throw off some red flags.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago

Liberals shoehorn “Hamas-run health ministry” into every Palestinian death figure but when israel says Iran killed thirty trillion morbillion protestors it might as well be the word of god

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 days ago

And the person who made that claim was a fasion blogger with no connection to the region.

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago

Most of them still do tbh. They just think that Trump "ruined" what would've been a perfect colour revolution by attacking.

[-] Dr_Pepper@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago

Hot take but I don't think they would have. Democrats are more about wars that go under the radar and can be spun as 'humanitarian'. Most libs didn't even think about Libya.

Iran has always been the 'one day' war, meaning most administrations would talk about it but wouldn't dare touch that hornets nest.

Trump 2 represents a distinct shift in US policy. There are no voices in the administration that are tethered to reality.

[-] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

You have to imagine the context though - which is presumably the Israelis saying "we are definitely going to topple the mullahs fyi". Maybe the Dems would have let Iran strike first and would currently be riding a wave of nationalist fervor?

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago

They might've made a more competent attempt at regime change

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

dems are more enthusiastic about bleeding russia in ukraine. they might be smart enough not to commit so much to the "pivot to asia" until that was winding down and MIC production capacity was more available.

we probably wouldn't know the names of any of the islands i've been an expert on for two weeks.

my guess for the main target of a Harris whitehouse would be whoever escalated resistance against isntrael, so maybe she'd be boots on the ground in yemen, or maybe just supporting the saudis in doing more genocide.

[-] Weedian@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago

israel would have and the US would have been "forced" to back them, just like in Gaza

[-] woodenghost@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, exactly, I completely agree, because what's the alternative? Just rolling over and accepting the decline of the empire? Capital wants these wars. If Trump was acting against capital, he wouldn't be president right now. Democrats represent a slightly different faction of capital with large overlaps to the one Republicans represent. Slightly more finance, more global. Faced with a multifaceted crisis the Democrats too would have used the one main tool they have left and escalated militarily.

[-] Sneakytrickyyy@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

I know for sure Israel would keep getting billions bumped into it like when

biden-troll & paid-for-by-kamala-harris were in charge

[-] bunnossin@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago

I'm gonna lose it. These people are not real

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

Nothing is stopping you from being at brunch now‽

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 days ago

But they can't enjoy it as much with the drama

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

How am I supposed to enjoy my mimosas when we have a Cheeto King?

[-] red_giant@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

I wish the adults in the room were bombing the Middle East instead of Trump

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

You can tell they've never been to a protest before because that sign can't be held up for any length of time with those tiny sticks.

[-] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

Dw they only need to hold it long enough for a photo

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Hopefully, being to a protest for the first time, means they'll learn too make better signs, and take up a more informed ideology, by being around PSL, DSA, Food not Bombs, or whatever left groups are there to radicalize the libs.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

This time we're not interrupting brunch but the conversation is the same every day.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
124 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14323 readers
978 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS