I heard the lead guy for HuniePop say the same not very long ago. He said the turnaround time for games made in regions with looser IP laws could be insane at times, and before you know it, your preview assets show up in some product.

Smart. Ethics are a thing of the past.

Pope also said he was more wary of releasing a major new game now because he enjoyed such critical success with Papers, Please and Return of the Obra Dinn that he doesn’t want to let players down.

“There’s also the sense that I was pretty happy with Obra Din and Papers, Please and I don’t… you know, maybe I can’t do it again, kind of thing. Do I really want to maybe just go out on a high note? Why drag my myself down with the next thing that people may not like?

You know, I feel him there. I can't even imagine how to make a successful follow-up after two games that were not just smash hits, but brilliant and unconventional too. Everyone is basically expecting a piece of genius (me included). Not to mention the step up from Papers to Obra Dinn was so huge in terms of production and scope that it's easy to expect another escalation.

I'm going to miss his blog about game development, even if I don't intend to do it, reading about how he figured out how to do the Obra Din graphics was pretty rad.

~~Early Access~~ AI Access

“But I I also like to talk about the stuff I’m working on, and I think just now the the situation kind of feels different to me, that you don’t really talk about stuff when you’re working on it because I don’t know it’s going to get slurped up by AI or people are going to copy it or something else like that.

The threat of your game idea being taken isn't from AI, it's from people.

An AI at worst will add the tweet or whatever you put out into its model and in 6 months it'll get released in the new version where maybe one day it might influence an output.

A human at worst will sit there an deliberately make your idea for themselves and publish it before you can.

I mean, valid.

Good idea.