56
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Their recalcitrance (difficulty to degrade) has earned PFAS a reputation as "forever chemicals"—permanent contaminants in the environment and in our bodies.

Loeffler and his team's finding that bacteria can incorporate these recalcitrant global contaminants into their cell membranes counters that fatalistic idea. The bacterial process identified in the research paper could contribute to cleaning up environmental PFAS contamination, although final disposal of the chemicals is still an unsolved issue.

The fact that they are using it doesn't tell whether that's a good or a bad thing. We also "integrate" some artificial chemicals in our tissues instead of using the naturally produced, but most of the time that results in us getting ill.

[-] spinne@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus tons of things eat those bacteria, then become food for someone else. How long do the PFASes persist in the bodies of organisms that consume them or the things that eat those critters? If/when they break down, how do those compounds interact with those organisms, or living tissue, or the surrounding environment? I have a lot of questions about this, but sure, the science is neat.

[-] clucose@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Science

6938 readers
160 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS