Private school is a mistake and should be illegal. Same with homeschooling.
Finland banned school tuition, essentially ending private schools except for some that are functionally identical to public schools including operating from public funding.
The rich realized they would have to send their children to public schools, and suddenly Finland built maybe the best education system in the world.
Private schools still have entrance exams you need to pass and are seen as better and more prestigious versus whatever the designated public school for your area is. Public schools with a large percentage of non-white/immigrant students typically have horrible reputations and Finnish parents are often desperate to make sure their kids don't end up going to them
My understanding is that the hell-schools that Finnish parents are desperate to save their children from are better than the majority of schools worldwide, probably because the built-in advantage that parental wealth has on test scores just isn't big enough to safely and consistently keep rich kids in the private schools.
Yeah, I'm just relaying the general sentiment I've had the misfortune of hearing repeated over and over again over a lifetime of social gatherings where racist mostly middle class people are present
What ended up happening with religious schools? I've thought a bit about this topic and didn't know any non-socialist countries had cracked down on private schooling.
What an insane thing, don't they hate that gays are indoctrinating kids? Why would they give up an opportunity to rebrainwash a kid?
The goal here is to make discrimination against LGBT people legal and government sanctioned
I'm sorry, I won't let your kids enroll here/hire you/rent you an apartment/give you medical treatment because of muh religious freedums
Also I assume there weren't a ton of rainbow families trying to get their kids into the daycares run by the Catholic parishes that began this lawsuit in the first place. Some right-wing think tank operatives just decided to use this law to attack LGBT rights
This.
The goal is to strike down the Civil Rights Act. They'll probably overturn Obergefell v. Hodges first, and then they'll go for the Civil Rights Act.
The Democrats probably will respond by just making the status quo ante continue in the states they control. If it happens before the midterms, they'll have no hope of contesting it in Congress, and even after the midterms, no matter what they will be some number of Sinemas or Manchins or Fettermans short of 261 votes (60%).
And in the more immediate term, this is about government funding, and the free rein of reactionaries to sap state and federal money/contracts without oversight or requirements.
Yeah I just think it's interesting how easily the rhetoric falls apart
it makes sense if you contort your brain into rightwing mode: children are the property of their parents and this is a restriction of lgbt parents' property rights
From your lips to Comey-Barett's ears. It's absurd how far they're going in efforts that are self-defeating and show of their own kool-aid they're drinking.
Every day I become more sympathetic to the League of Militant Atheists

But those families would still be expected to pay their taxes, which would make its way into the pockets of the schools denying them access.
Doesn't seem like it should be a difficult decision, but then again it's the Supreme Court we're talking about.
Who won the bidding war?
I would really like a real time website that shows each time any judge is bribed, threatened or blackmailed.
People would loose sleep watching all the new notices pop up all the time.
Said it before and I’ll say it again….must….resist….Reddit Atheism…..
fuck Sam Harris and the rest of those traitors in becoming Christoid neocon apologists.
reddit atheists were always correct when talking about american christianity. the problem was that some of them focused on brown people on the other side of the world instead of the bigger and more present threat at home
the backlash to reddit atheism from normies also failed to focus on the bigger threat, in favor of being personally annoyed, because the megachurches and dominionists weren't on reddit.
Calling it now, it's going to be a very bad decision.
This will almost certainly go through, reminder of the case that went 8-1 (aka two liberals signed on in agreement) that said outlawing conversion therapy was unconstitutional on the basis of free speech. (In reality it was something 2% more nuanced about requiring strict scrutiny due to viewpoint discrimination but in reality that means it's declared unconstitutional with extra steps).
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.