82
Czuba's attorneys disagreed, citing Czuba's age and the fact that he is a veteran without any criminal convictions.
I know it's like, their job or whatever, but I hope this guy's attorneys recognize they're shitbags
Nah I don't buy it. Procedural due process is valuable. Part of the procedure is evaluation of the claim and it's merits, and then it can be acted on or not. The attorneys are doing their job and it's important - now if the Judge GRANTS that request, the judge is a shit bag.
No. It should not be acceptable to knowingly lie
Well I agree with you - which is precisely why we should have a functioning and fair system for adjudicating claims, establishing facts, and evaluating the merit of various arguments.
One can and perhaps should imagine a more collaborative model of justice, but our current model is adversarial and, arguably, gladiatorial. Both sides present the strongest possible version of their case - intentional misrepresentation by prioritizing favorable context/evidence and ignoring, minimizing, or calling into question damning context/evidence is by definition what each side is supposed to do. By aggressively pursuing each party's interests to the extreme, neither can say they didn't receive a robust and fair hearing of their position. In fact, they had the best possible representation of their position and very likely better than they could have formulated on their own. Then the jury or judge weighs the merits, truth, and context against each other and determines which side is more trustworthy/meritorious. That can include punishment for perjury if either party knowingly lied.
To pre-assert that some people are not allowed to make claims in their own defense is wildly out of line with any presumption of innocence until proven guilty and immediately likely to result in further abuse of the most marginalized.
Where's the lie? They said he's a vet and he's x age, therefore he can't be dangerous. The fact that that's a fucking ridiculous and obviously weak defense only means that it's that much easier to say "no, fuck you, that's dumb, to the wall"
People have the right to put forward their best defense, and in cases like this where their crime is completely indefensible, that doesn't help them
ALAB 
Yeah, good. Okay.
Post revolution I'd still appreciate formal mechanisms of adjudication and rather we not default to beating each other to death during disputes - but to each their own I guess.
It was merely a joke
Whew. I was this close to doing a sectarianism lmao.
Also all lawyers ARE bastards... But that's just a coincidence! It's not systemically rooted in their position upholding oppression like the pigs.
I'd like the legal profession a lot more if it weren't for capitalism
Come join me in the Tax Prosecutors office (not really my area but close enough) and help create an entire new generation of fascists when you go to petite bougie and tell them that they can't use their business as a slush fund. I love it here 
There's a Korean comic on webtoon called "The Tax Reaper", about a junior tax prosecutor with the magical ability to see how much back taxes someone owed as glowing numbers floating over their head. It's very enjoyable for the overdramatized confrontations with bougie tax dodgers.
Half the time I can't even get the bougie fucks to show up to court, which is always fun. But it does make my life easier, since I don't have to listen to them blabber on and on about how business owners are oppressed.
Literally murdered a child and he's NOT a threat to the community 
The attorneys aren't the ones 'disagreeing' persay. They are acting on behalf of their clients wishes. If the client pleads not guilty and wants to get out, he's allowed to assert that and it's the legal obligation of the attorneys to frame it in the most compelling way possible within the confines of the law.
It's then on the Judge to evaluate the merit of the claim and grant/deny it. He SHOULD recognize it as bull shit, of course. But it's not an indictment of the system that shitbags get to argue in their own defense. It's only an indictment when that argument works.
he is a veteran
That's the part I'm hung up on. "He's not a threat because he's been conditioned to kill"
it's just a flag for citizens of the reich to engage their soldier worship to get the murderer sympathy
they don't actally believe the bullshit they spout
every beheaded baby myth propagator bears some responsibility
citing Czuba's age
He was this age when he literally stabbed a child who trusted him
he is a veteran
I hate that people think this is a valid defense
he is a veteran
I hate that people think this is a valid defense
It doesn't make any sort of sense. It seems pretty obvious that someone who was trained to kill is more likely to murder someone than the average person.
I agree, Czuba should be detained.
he can plead all he wants
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)
news
24545 readers
634 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS