288
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

We’ve been here before, albeit on a much smaller scale and overseas. Between 1967 and 1972, the CIA ran a program in South Vietnam called Phoenix that generated intelligence-scored capture-or-kill lists of suspected Viet Cong and eventually killed somewhere between twenty-six- and forty-thousand people, many of them innocent Vietnamese civilians mistakenly flagged by informants and unreliable data

Jesus

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

FAA quietly issued a nationwide notice in January creating 3,000-foot no-fly zones around every DHS and ICE vehicle, so that citizens and journalists can’t film federal immigration operations from the air.

Now that's something I haven't heard before

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Anyone remember that short film from 2017 Slaughterbots?

https://youtu.be/O-2tpwW0kmU

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

seems like where things are headed

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

it makes you wonder how the media will spin this into a good thing. lol

that's assuming that they do more than gloss over it at all or call the victims terrorists.

[-] Korkki@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

More important question is how you'll fight it? Protest nicely? I seriously see no other option beside popular counter assassination campaign.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

at that stage, i wonder if there's anything we could do about it.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

this came to mind watching ai software developers proselytize moving from place to place like gypsies on socal media for the last few weeks. lol

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

Which was revealed when Anthropic made their very simple demands and the administration threw a tantrum.

  1. No fully autonomous murder; a human must make the final decision.

  2. No domestic mass surveillance.

Pretty simple demands that should have been easy to agree to.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 days ago

I'm still convinced this was just pure theatre to present them as the good and independent company that's totally not working with the fascist state.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't say "pure" theatre. I think the demands were serious while also being a common sense PR move that would also motivate (or not demotivate) their employees.

But they were supposed to just be easy to agree to. "Okay, yeah, we'll have an overseer on the murder bots, and we won't use it to spy on Americans." Even with an optional wink wink nudge nudge, it still mostly works for Anthropic's PR.

It was supposed to be a layup, and the administration airballed it.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago
[-] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. Why would they want to turn down the ability to collect surveillance data on all their enemies?

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Umm..didn't Obama do this to the first US American living abroad?

We've had this reality for a looong time

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

-- but it's still a novel idea to many so it might as well be new.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago

To understand what’s coming unless Congress steps in to stop it now, you must first know about what’s already been built in Gaza that’s the template for the Trump regime. An Israeli intelligence whistleblower told the Israeli magazine +972 in April 2024 about an AI system called Lavender that ranked the entire population of Gaza by “probability of militant affiliation.”

ELITE pulls data from the IRS, the Social Security Administration, DMV records, Medicaid files, utility bills, license-plate readers, and commercial data brokers (which typically include social media posts and often even emails when they come from “free” email providers), then populates a map with dossiers and assigns a “confidence score” to each person’s current address. If you update your address to get medical care, for example, that updates your score. Or post something on social media.

I think it's important to note that one of the metadata points that increased your chances of being bombed in Gaza was if you slept somewhere different too often.

So, I wouldn't be surprised if "changing your address too frequently" makes you climb the kill list in the US program

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

goes both ways. drones are 3d printable, and nazis can also explode.

they may not want to open this pandora's box.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Link to BOM? I'm especially interested in underwater ones like Yemen was using.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

there are plenty in places like thingiverse, from simple and cheap ones for playing with, to the more complicated ones that can carry loads, to tiny drones meant for racing.

i might be wrong but there may be ready made underwater drones out there to download.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago

They do, and they will win. I'm at least glad it is finally over, no one wanted to fight back, well the nazis can just kill us off already, and have their shit world.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

They aren't winning in Iran. Why is that?

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Other fascists kicking their ass atm because of a blunder.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

not with that attitude.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

With Renee Good, the decision to kill her was made by a human being who was operating inside a system that had already decided her neighborhood, her opposition to ICE, and her observer status made her a legitimate target. What happens when that decision is made in twenty seconds by a machine down in Florida, and executed by a hovering armed drone as the FAA has cleared the civilian sky so nobody is watching?

Sounds like we need cheap open source defense drones that can defend our communities by knocking these murder drones out of the sky.

Does anyone have a link to a project to 3d print drones that can be used to disable other drones in the sky?

[-] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"The government plans to begin sending killer drones after you!"

[...the rest of the article...]

"I urgently need you to call your government representative and tell them you think that's bad; also vote"

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Their responsibilities include counterterrorism, unconventional warfare...

I read that as "we will fight terrorism with terrorism"

...and that's especially concerning because the current administration defines "writing articles like this one" as terrorism, because it's antifascist

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

As far as I can tell, it's been reality for like 20 years now. The drones became smaller and perhaps more precise, that is all

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Don't want to be that guy, but this is far from new news.

"Less than two weeks ago, the United States conducted a drone strike over central Yemen, killing one al-Qaeda operative. The strike was the last under Obama (that we know of). The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. As he reportedly told senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”

This is from 2017. You can find even older stuff.

https://www.cfr.org/articles/obamas-final-drone-strike-data

[-] tyler@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

None of those were autonomous strikes.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago

Fucking cowards using flying drones. Kill me with a full humanoid and then I'll be impressed.

[-] Dymonika@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

cowards

Haha, keep going. I'm sorry, but news flash, they don't care. To them, even a live dog is better than a dead lion.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Gonna link to this thread the next time someone gives me shit for adding a /s to what they thought was "obvious" sarcasm.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago

I recently read Kill Decision by Daniel Suarez from 2012. All in all it was an OK read, but I couldn't help feeling that the book had been overtaken by reality.

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

At the time that was the case as well - drone activity during the "war on terror" was widespread and largely indiscriminate in targeting.

[-] baggins@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

That’s a bit scary.

[-] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The abandoned this a few days ago because of a law suit that rightfully pointed out that because ICE refuses to make themselves easily identifiable, the rule is impossible to follow. A drone operator can't know where an Ice vehicle is before launching a drone.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
288 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

42469 readers
126 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS