223

The 35-year-old New York lawmaker has pleaded not guilty to charges accusing him of crimes including laundering funds to pay for his personal expenses, illegally receiving unemployment benefits and charging donors' credit cards without their consent.

The former treasurer for Santos' campaign pleaded guilty on Oct. 5 to a conspiracy charge for inflating fundraising numbers.

"I must warn my colleagues that voting for expulsion at this point would circumvent the judicial system's right to due process that I'm entitled to and desanctify the long-held premise that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty," Santos said ahead of the vote.

Expulsion of a lawmaker requires a vote by two-thirds of the chamber. Only five people have been expelled from the House in the country's history, three for fighting against the U.S. government in the Civil War.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fosiacat@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago

he’s literally a con man, how is he still in office

[-] instamat@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

He’s in a conman club and they look out for each other? Idk, I’m just trying to make it make sense.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago
[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

This would imply that there republicans that are not cunts

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Nah, the words are interchangeable. All republicans are repugnant and cunts.

[-] DreamerofDays@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The republicans have a thin majority in the House. Even without whatever other justifications that’s a strong incentive not to bleed any more seats. Particularly when Gaetz and the Arson Caucus keeps setting the place on fire.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Conservatives love con men. Were you in a coma since 2015?

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Based on the last line, you pretty much have to be actively at war with the country to get expelled pretty much.

There's not much precedent for it successfully being used for this.

Not to say he hasn't done anything wrong, just that there's not much to expect from this.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's literally called con-gress

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

This is why I keep telling people we can't pass an Amendment to do things like change gun control.

It starts with a 2/3rds majority in the House, 290 votes.

We couldn't get 290 votes to agree on Santos' obvious crimimal behavior, we'll NEVER get it on something like the 2nd Amendment, or Supreme Court term limits, or anything else remotely useful.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

Democrats should make him the poster child Republican. The most honest shining member of the bunch who at least admits he's blatantly lying. The one they all banded together to save. They deserve him.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

31 Democrats voted to keep him. 24 Republicans voted to boot him. It didn't even make a simple majority, though that 62 vote swing would helped a bunch.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, he got more support than several of their own candidates for speaker. (I think. Can't be bothered to look up the numbers. It's all kinda pointless.)

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They're waiting for the official ethics board, or whatever, to make their ruling. It's not so much that the Dems support Santos, as they do the rules and means of Congress

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You aren't wrong and that's pretty funny to think about.

What a shitshow.

[-] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Who can talk the most lies (who can talk the most lies)

Pretend they are a Jew (pretend they are a Jew)

Cover up with sequins for a contest or two

The Republican can (the Republican can)

Oh, the Republican can (the Republican can)

The Republican can 'cause he mixes it with lies

And makes his world a falsehood (makes his world a falsehood)

[-] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The republican fakes;

obfuscates, opaque,

always lying and pernicious

Every statement is fictitious, you could even say malicious

[-] gazby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Had to sing it in my head 😂💙

[-] mtdyson_01@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

They will not expel him even if he is found guilty because they absolutely need his vote. He will be forced to vote however they want because if he doesn't he will lose his job and the money and protection his job provides.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And just like that, a vote that should have been the simplest, most-straightforward choice with one outcome obviously preferable to its alternative, proved to be too much to ask

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
223 points (98.3% liked)

News

23268 readers
2065 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS