92
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago

Does that strategy include negotiating with Democrats? No? Enjoy shutting it down.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 46 points 11 months ago

They already negotiated with the President and backtracked on the deal they made. So, I don't know how useful that would be.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago

This isn't a "vacation" for federal employees. Many of which will have to go without pay but continue working until it's resolved.

A very very tiny percent get paid with non appropriated funds and will keep getting paid.

But even the military won't, we'll back pay them, but most Americans live paycheck to paycheck. And even one missed check can have drastic consequences.

People enter federal service for stability, and Republicans constantly trying to take that away is just another way they try to shrink the government

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Yes, and at times like these some military leaders tend to tell troops to "be financially ready" to go unpaid, and "there is no excuse for not paying your bills on time".

Late and missed payments are sometimes reported to members' leadership by the debtors, especially landlords. Normally this isn't such a bad thing, since service members are expected to be on top of their debts at all times--but being punished for this when going unpaid is completely cruel.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It works too.

When I was in we got lined up for muster before elections days and our leadership would talk about how "this never happens with a Republican pres and voting is important".

Completely ignorant that the reason is Dems won't hold our military hostage for funding cuts to social programs.

The reason it almost never happens with a Republican pres, is republicans are the ones that make it happen.

And yeah, the main reason people lose security clearances (military and fed civilians) is financial issues like debts.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

"this never happens with a Republican pres and voting is important"

Wow, in my experience they usually try to be more subtle than that.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

If they actually said that it's a violation of the Hatch act.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I was in an engine room in the Navy...

Fist fighting was still an acceptable way to solve personal disputes, and higher ups intentionally ignored stuff like the occasional black eye. It's like the last bastion of "old navy"

The culture wasn't a good thing, people got away with a lot of shit because no matter what happened, the ship has to keep moving.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago

8 members of that same party are working hard to ensure a shutdown. It's funny how the whole party will bend over backwards to appease those 8 trying to tear the whole system down, but you can't find 5 of them to work with the Democrats.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The speaker vote was final confirmation that there are no more moderate conservatives in the house.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

There is only one unforgivable sin in the Republican party, and that's working with the Democrats.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

I hope the budget gets past Johnson's porn filter.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Dont worry, it only takes periodic screenshots of your device!

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago

It's called "compromise", so they won't actually do it or anything productive.

[-] RedditReject@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

The only strategy they are working on is how to convince the voters it is the Democrats' fault

[-] tuxtey@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Anything but their damn job?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

What a freaking load. The cons love to play this stupid game at every opportunity. So tired of this party and all the harm they do.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 13 points 11 months ago

Punchbowl News: “Ten days from now, the federal government will be on the brink of shutting down.”

“Here’s where things stand: Speaker Mike Johnson, in his second full week leading the House, is heading to the Capitol basement this morning to discuss several options to avert a shutdown come Nov. 17.”

“Meanwhile, across the Capitol, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the Senate is setting the stage to jam the House with a massive omnibus-like bill around the holidays. This is exactly what House Republicans have said they want to avoid. Unfortunately for them, the Senate GOP doesn’t really care"

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago
  1. Fail to pass reasonable spending bill
  2. Repeat until plebe workers almost unpaid
  3. Push payola/cruelty-ridden shit spending bill through, demanding rights and support services as tribute because fuck the plebes anyway
  4. "We compromised despite stupid democrats"
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — The federal government runs out of money in less than two weeks, but House Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team have yet to settle on a strategy to avert a shutdown.

But during the private meeting Monday, GOP leaders also discussed an idea, favored by conservatives, that calls for staggered, short-term stopgap funding measures.

The idea, first proposed by Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., a member of the far-right Freedom Caucus, has been discussed in the Capitol — and panned on social media — as a “laddered” CR.

The general concept would be to keep the heat on the Senate to pass individual appropriations bills while giving hard-line Republicans in the House, who typically balk at stopgap funding measures, incentives to vote for them.

Johnson, who is enjoying a honeymoon period, has previously floated a short-term bill through January — or April, depending on what his members prefer — and even ultraconservatives said they're willing to give him space to pursue it.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, the vice chair of the Appropriations Committee, said her preference is to continue moving full funding bills in “minibuses” — packaging three at a time.


The original article contains 752 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
92 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS