351

Back of the fridge supplies (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

Drone with grenade make tonk sad.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

Vatnik surrender to toy Tonka truck.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

oh no, all of Netherlands' F16s need to be disposed of to make room for the F35s - wherever shall we send them?

[-] MadSurgeon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'll make sure they are disposed of properly.

[-] gabereal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

'Ay, the TOW is not 'leftover cold war shit', it is a tank-killing juggernaut. As long as you don't mind standing absolutely still for like 20 seconds after firing the missile (so the missile can track the target).

[-] nuke@yah.lol 5 points 1 year ago

3000 Red Lines of Russia

something something China's final warning

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

3000 3-day special exercises

[-] lyth@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I thought Russia was fighting with Cold War stuff and that that's part of why they were on the back foot. Something about rusty AK-47s

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the satellite images of their boneyards are to be believed, it appears that they've used up anything that was newer than the 1950s, and are rapidly depleting all their leftover WWII and 1950s equipment. I saw a thread the other day that someone linked pics, and they're down to less than 20% of their "backup" equipment.

[+] TWeaK@lemm.ee -17 points 1 year ago

It does annoy me that basically countries are giving their surpless weapons to Ukraine, only to buy new weapons for themselves. It's still growing the weapons industry, which is keen to encourage war across the globe, as that leads to money.

Meanwhile Ukraine are receiving weapons not as donations, but bilateral aid agreements. This means that Ukraine is expected to pay them back some day. In reality, Ukraine will likely never be able to pay them back (and even if they can they will be left financially destitute either way) so all that's going to happen is the debt will be written off. So current governments can fiddle their books and say "yes, we've got a deficit, but we're going to get so much money back in the future!!" only for that debt to be written off. But hey, that's a future government's problem.

[-] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

You might find this fact sheet interesting.

The United Kingdom still has amounts outstanding from World War II and its immediate aftermath which it continues to repay on a regular basis. World War II-era claims on Iran have been incorporated into the claims being adjudicated by the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, established after the 1979 Iranian revolution. Lend Lease claims against the former Soviet Union arising from World War II were settled in a 1972 agreement between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. In the 1972 agreement, the U.S.S.R. pledged to make three initial payments totaling $48 million and to repay the remaining Lend Lease debt once the United States had granted Most Favored Nations (MFN) trade status. The Soviet Union made the three initial downpayments, but because it did not obtain MFN status at that time -- because of conditions set forth in the 1974 Trade Act -- its obligation to make the remaining payments toward its Lend Lease debt was not triggered before the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. However, MFN status was extended to the Russian Federation in 1992, and accordingly, in 1993, Russia signed an agreement with the U.S. in which it acknowledged its liability and agreed to a repayment schedule for the former U.S.S.R.'s Lend Lease debt. Finally, the U.S. continues to work for a resolution with Taiwan of the issue of debts arising from World War II-era loans extended to China.

(Note, this document was written in 2000. UK paid off it's WWII debts in 2006.)

[-] nuke@yah.lol 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s still growing the weapons industry

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

It’s still growing the weapons industry, which is keen to encourage war across the globe, as that leads to money.

Maybe if the rest of the world actually built up a decent army, instead of leaving all of the military matters to the US, then the US wouldn't have to spend half of it's goddamn budget on the military-industrial complex.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023

351 points (98.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6669 readers

364 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.

Join our Matrix chatroom

Other communities you may be interested in

Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Shit@sh.itjust.works

OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca

fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works

verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works

verity_kindle@lemmy.world

skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de

nuke@sh.itjust.works

skillissuer@sh.itjust.works

Estiar@sh.itjust.works

neidu2@feddit.nl

neidu3@sh.itjust.works