Everyone loves snaps : memes

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 11 months ago

I recently just switched to Pop! and it's so crazy how much fun linux is now! I was pulling my hair out at Ubuntu because of things like Snaps, trying to get nvidia to work, and so many weird quirks. (My audio just had a low buzzing noise until I reconfigured Pulse, scaling had to be manually set in a config file, I had to change a few nvidia configs to get my games to play at over 30fps, and no native flatpak integration obviously because of snaps)

But with Pop everything just works! Flatpaks are in the pop shop, the distro had an option with nvidia configured out of the box, it's been the easiest linux setup I've ever had. I need to go deeper into the weeds with Fedora and Arch, but goddamn Pop is going to be my go-to from here on out.

[-] ensignrick@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Pop_OS! Is the one I chose to finally move full time to Linux. I have zero regrets. It's been great

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Running this distro on my laptop for its great window manager. Good stuff!

[-] IsThisLoss@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

It's just gnome

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Customized gnome with pop tiling manager iirc. It’s a pretty good mobile experience compared to default gnome.

[-] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 months ago

Snap is what finally forced me to explore the vast selection of distros. Mint Linux is working well for me. I do miss Plasma Desktop though.

[-] noodle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wonderfull + You are free to install Plasma on your Mint

[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I've done this, works great.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Love Mint

[-] IsThisLoss@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

https://helpdeskgeek.com/linux-tips/how-to-install-kde-plasma-desktop-on-linux-mint/

I'm not a fan of Cinnamon either, but switching is easy.

[-] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 15 points 11 months ago

It's one of the reasons on my next rebuild I'll be moving off Ubuntu. I always used Ubuntu because it was stable and you can find articles for almost anything. But there's some great distros out there now and I don't like Snaps.

I'm waiting for the next Build of POP OS which should be out soon and I'll hop over to that probably in the new year.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

...or you could just use Debian.

[-] Teppic@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

...or Mint depending whether they'd rather move up, or down the hierarchy.

[-] Sailing7@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Linux beginner here. Whats snaps?

[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

It's a package format that bundles all required libraries, that way you don't run into the issue with program A requiring library version <1.1 and program B requiring library >1.3.

It leads to larger binaries because these dependencies are bundled, but it solves the issue with old/minimally maintained software not working on new OS versions because they depend on an ancient version of libssl or something.

[-] RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Snaps is Ubuntu/Canonicals proprietary package format which is mostly considered a worse alternative to flatpak (another package format) with no real advantages on desktops that Canonical is trying to force on users

[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Snaps are not a proprietary package format.

[-] RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

The backend is proprietary

[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The webserver that canonical uses to distribute other people's snaps is, and that's it. APKs aren't proprietary just because Google runs the Play store.

If you don't want to interact with canonical's servers you can download the snap files from literally anywhere else and install them manually so you don't have to touch a single line of non open source code.

[-] GamesRevolution@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Even if you do download the snaps from elsewhere you are still locked in with the Canonical repository for updates, with it being basically hard coded and with no alternatives. Even more, snaps are straight up a worst experience then flatpak with all their quirks like the loopback devices and the automatic updates.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

yeah, snaps, that's the only thing holding Ubuntu back

not dpkg and by extension apt being a flaming dumpster fire that will corrupt the package database if you look at it funny and there being no way out of that other than an OS reinstall

not the fact that there are zero tools for managing dependencies when building a program from source and you're entirely on your own when it comes to what *-dev packages you need to install

not the fact that Ubuntu is one of only two distros out of the hundreds that are out there where you can't use the computer while it's installing updates

not Canonical's general policy of "hey, this technology seems pretty cool, let's find out whether it's good or not by forcing it on all our users and seeing if they complain" (see: miri display server, cinnamon desktop, and of course snaps)

not the fact that there are ADS IN THE GODDAMN TERMINAL

not the fact that it's a Linux distro that thinks it's smarter than you and does something other than what you told it to based on what it thinks you meant (see: apt install firefox installing the snap) which IMO negates one of the primary reasons to use Linux

no it's snaps

snaps are the problem

[-] pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org 12 points 11 months ago

I don't know what you're mostly on.

Dpkg is nowadays rock solid. I had 300 debians working together and auto updating at the same time, never had an issue.
managing dépendances when building from source, apart from Gentoo being built around the emerge management, no other package manager has any clue about source building dependencies.
confused about what's the problem when using 'buntu while it's updating.
Agree with this one. Fuck Canonical
same as above.
so it's snap the problem then?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

admittedly it's been a couple years since I last used Ubuntu, and it may have gotten better in that time
I was talking about the AUR
see my first response. I remembered Ubuntu occasionally doing what Windows does and forcing a reboot, then spinning for 10-15m doing god knows what. Glad to hear they've fixed that
as for the last one I was talking about the fact that Canonical is willing to do that in the first place. It's not the snap itself, it's the fact that I told it to install a native package and it decided for me what I wanted. Shit like that is why I left Windows behind. "You don't really want to set your default browser to something other than Edge, do you?"

[-] pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org 3 points 11 months ago

Tha aur is cheating, it's basically a script to install the correct dependancies. It's also not integrated natively into pacman so it's not related to the package manager itself.

Ok I understand what you mean for your last point

[-] GlenTheFrog@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Cinnamon Desktop? Cononical? Since when was Linux Mint owned by Canonical?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

Did I say Cinnamon I meant Unity

[-] joshcodes@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

I started using ubuntu 2 years ago and its great. Just disable snaps. It's like 5 commands (and you have to reinstall Firefox).

You stop snap store from running, disable it from restarting then set apt over snap store as default.

It's not hard. I did it day 1 of using Linux. Plus there's guides a plenty on how to do it.

[-] GamesRevolution@programming.dev 12 points 11 months ago

If you are using Ubuntu and disabling snaps, might as well use something else. Snaps are basically the selling point of Ubuntu and any other distro based on it will provide a better experience if you don't want them.

[-] joshcodes@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

What about all the other pros of ubuntu?

Off the top of my head,

their power management is better than any other distro for laptops.
Their compatibility with WiFi drivers is better than many others, granted that's not exclusive to ubuntu but it is a pro.
theyre more up to date than debian but stable while actually coming with Wayland support unlike Mint. Timeshift is great tho, good thing it's compatible with ubuntu.
their community is much larger than many other distro so support is easier to find.
it's just not a bad distro. There's not a lot of other distros that match its out-of-the-box experience.

Other distros are good. PopOS is good. I chose Ubuntu mostly because it's solid and stable but also because it has a wide community for help. I'm just getting tired of the narrative that ubuntu is totally crippled by its snaps. This is a linux distro, if I don't like something I get to change it, which is actually cool. This isn't windows where I have no control. Also, with snaps gone, I've literally never had a problem I haven't caused. I have the approach of strip out what I don't want. Arch users install what they do want. At the end of the day, we both are exploiting software we want to use to be productive. If I found myself fighting the os (like Mac or Windows) I'd switch but I don't so I won't.

[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

What about all the other pros of ubuntu?

uses a cool word from the Zulu language

[-] joshcodes@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

This guy gets it

[-] activ8r@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

At that point just use PopOS. Why the hell would you use Ubuntu just to disable snaps?

[-] joshcodes@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Because snaps aren't the only feature the distro comes with. It's widely versatile, commonly used, and this argument isn't a good one. PopOS is good, so is ubuntu minus the snaps.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Why did you disable snaps on the first day of using Linux?

[-] joshcodes@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

That sentence should probably read "on my first day of using Linux outside of a vm on bare metal with an installation I intended to keep". I use Kali for security work and I used Manjaro once but it killed itself before I knew what I was doing.

Snaps are not very space efficient, I don't need the same packages installed multiple times. In a desktop use case that's a lot of repeating packages.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I think you're gonna have a bad time since that's essentially what all the newer formats do (flatpak, snap, appimage).

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

sudo apt purge -y snapd && sudo apt install -y gnome-software-plugin-flatpak && flatpak remote-add flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo

For everything else Fedora is looking good. PopOS has potential.

[-] poinck@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

"I am more like a flatpak guy myself"

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Why does everyone hate snaps? I mainly just use Ubuntu for work, but snaps seemed to work well enough.

[-] noodle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Cause Snap is proprietary and the repo is controlled only by Canonical/Ubuntu. Flatpack on the other hand allows for third parry repos. And then one might even preference a classical install because ironically its snappier - faster - especially on oldee setups

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

But you can install multiple app stores, right? This is just one. My understanding is that it also adds sandboxing to any snaps you installed.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Snaps have sandboxing but only on Ubuntu I think. Flatpaks have sandboxing too but that should work in every distro.

[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Snap is not proprietary.

The snapcraft webserver backend is closed source but everything snap adjacent that touches your computer is open source, and you can distribute snaps and install them without using the snap store

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They are 1. Slow on launch and on boot. 2. Very opaque and offer little control. 3. They don't integrate well. 4. Proprietary. 5. Probably most importantly, Canonical has made 0 progress and demonstrated 0 interest in improving issues 1-4.

[-] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You can just choose not to use it. They still release everything through their regular repositories for now.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

FOR NOW

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

The apt package of KeePassXC would fail repeatedly to recognize my hardware token. The snap package ironically works like a charm.

[-] XEAL@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

What the did with Firefox is a war crime...

BUT, the other day I had to instal DBeaver and using snap was for sure the easiest/fastest way

Memes

Rules: