92
"Everybody has health insurance" is not universal health care. I have health insurance and thousands of dollars of medical debt. And it's good insurance.
I was about to say, OP is either pushing something or a moron.
I’m sorry to hear about your situation. This article focuses more on efforts to reduce the number of uninsured people and is aware of what you’re saying about costs:
…many of the people who technically have health insurance still find it difficult to cover their share of their medical bills. Nevertheless, more people enjoy some financial protection against health care expenses than in any previous period in US history.
That's great and I'm glad to hear it. It still isn't universal healthcare by any means. Universal healthcare means removing profit motive from the system.
Yeah the article seems to draw the definition from this:
The United States is the only wealthy industrialized nation without universal health coverage, a crucial component to ensuring quality health care for all without financial burden that causes delay or avoidance of necessary medical care.
More fun to mention 11 “states” at a 5.1% uninsured cutoff, because number 11 is Peurto Rico -- a US territory that you might expect to be less developed. Since people are forced to run javascript to see the list, I’ll copy it here up to the 6% point:
- Massachusetts
- District of Columbia
- Hawaii
- Vermont
- Iowa (what’s a red state doing here?)
- Rhode Island
- Minnesota
- New Hampshire
- Michigan
- New York
- Puerto Rico
- Connecticut
- Pennsylvania
- Wisconsin
- Kentucky (what’s a red state doing here?)
- Delaware
- Ohio (what’s a red state doing here? OH will worsen over time; to be fair they only recently became solidly red)
- West Virginia
…
(22) California (6.5%.. worse than we might expect for CA)
…
(52) Texas ← ha! Of course Texass is last. 16.6% uninsured in the most notable red state showing us how to take care of people
The general pattern is expected.. the bottom of the list is mostly red states.
It's almost like Democrats tend to work to get Healthcare for people, and Republicans tend not to. Weird, I was told all political parties are the same.
I'll also point out Iowa and Ohio are more purplish states, both voted for Obama twice. Ohio still has a democratic senator.
Kentucky also has a democratic governor that ran on expanding Medicaid access.
Republicans tend to work to get more money for insurance and healthcare companies and tell the uninsured to get fucked.
Kentucky is there because of Kynect. When the ACA passed, Kentucky was one of the few red states to create our own state insurance exchange instead of relying on the federal exchange (which in hindsight, is a really fucking funny thing for the other red states to do. I thought they hated relying on the federal government?). At the time, it was lauded as a prime example of how to create and run such an exchange. And despite Bevin dismantling it when he was elected, our current governor made sure to restart it.
Also, because our governor at the time was a Democrat (Steve Beshear, the father of our current governor) Kentucky took the Medicaid expansion. So we had the money to cover the extra enrollees.
Yeah Massachusetts hardly surprises. They've had a fantastic healthcare program in effect for over a decade. Crazy what you can accomplish when you mass millions of people under a non-profit public entity payer...
Fun fact, Obamacare was modeled on Massachusetts. And you'll never believe who championed it: Republican governor Mitt Romney.
Glad the number has dropped a lot since then. Hopefully it can continue.
Jesus, Texas is high as shit.
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
92 points (89.0% liked)
News
23259 readers
1535 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS