236
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 85 points 11 months ago

What, the usual GOP modus operandi of "Launder Russian money by buying a shitload of these books to force them onto best-seller lists and then give them away at our klan rallies" isn't happening now?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

She may be dumb enough to think people were actually buying those books.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

If only her supporters could read 😔

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

If her supporters could read, they wouldn't support her.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 13 points 11 months ago

Inb4 she's next year's new RINO.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago

Why rhino next year when you can horse this year?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brothershamus@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Man web search is getting really bad. I can't find where that happened and normally it would be pretty easy. Was that a Bush II-era thing or was that a Trump thing?

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's a standard way to funnel campaign donations into your personal bank account. You negotiate a big percentage of each book sell with the publisher or self publish, have a ghost writer whip out a book, then use campaign money to buy the books to hand out at rallies.

So you get a 30% cut of each sale and you buy 1mil of books with politcal donations, boom! You just got 300k, and you profit from any rube actually buying the book out in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago

The Venn diagram of people who read and people who care about MTG is an "8"

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] Why9@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

If those people knew their numbers or even knew what a venn diagram was, they would be unfathomably angry

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago
  1. Tell everyone reading books is bad.
  2. Write a book.
  3. Profit.
[-] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Well, in this case:

~~3. Profit~~

There is hope for the world

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

She forgot step 2a) Have some political action committees purchase thousands of copies of your book to make it appear on bestseller lists despite few actual humans buying copies.

[-] Meltrax@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

She can read?

She can write??

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago
[-] Gott@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Their lack of literacy would explain the poor sales numbers.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

You’d think they’d be stocking up on burnables for winter, though?

[-] WhollyGuacamole@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Most likely a ghostwriter.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
  1. Maybe

  2. Not really

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 37 points 11 months ago

She wrote a book for people who refuse to read.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Normally all of these books are straight trash but GOP PACs buys up thousands of copies to get them on best seller lists. Greene seemingly doesn't have support of a competent PAC that knows how to grift. So while on the surface this makes her look out of touch, reading deeper the low sales also mean her support from the party is thinner than her resume.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clericc@feddit.de 27 points 11 months ago

Another reader joked that the book had nothing to do with Magic: The Gathering

heh

[-] quinkin@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago
[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Amazing what a ghost writer can do lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Good. Now stop giving it free advertising by writing about it in your publication!

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

Yet, we're writing articles about it, posting about it, commenting on it. Exactly what this freak wants.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 18 points 11 months ago

ranking 9,735 among its best-selling books as of Monday, November 27

I watched a TikTok over the weekend by an author who was ranked 87th (83rd? Somewhere in the 80's) on Amazon bestsellers and she dished that the number of books including pre-orders that she sold her first week to attain that rank: 650 copies.

Now maybe this is the rank on the annual or overall bestselling list where you would expect a recent release to rank poorly (in which case, awful journalism to pick a meaningless stat to manipulate the message - I don't care if we do happen to align politically, don't do that shit), but if that is the weekly list, those 8 reviews she got might be the total number of sales.

[-] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

It's a book that banned itself.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

It’d probably help if her loyalist supporters could read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I'm impressed they were able to teach a monkey how to write at all

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Just because she's the author, doesn't mean she wrote it.

Like "Trump's" Art of the Deal: when you're a celebrity, you can slap your name on any ghostwritten/AI-generated bullshit and get some sales. Guess MTG is not the celebrity she thinks she is.

[-] mephiska@fedia.io 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I always figured these politician written books were just another way to funnel campaign money into their own pockets. Campaign or associated big donors & PACs buy thousands of copies of the books with campaign money. She must not have as much support as she though and her own campaign might be cash strapped.

[-] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 14 points 11 months ago

It's almost as if her target audience for it don't read.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 11 points 11 months ago

I heard it was a self published coloring book highlighting the various forms of VD this trollop collected while working the glory holes around DC.

[-] 15liam20@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Sounds heavy on the brown.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

She looks like a summer sausage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

In business I think we call that misunderstanding your core demographic.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I'm sure it will do great once it hits the dollar stores...

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 months ago

Depends how absorbent the pages are

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Watch her pivot to blaming either being cancelled, or the Jews running the media, taking that line to her fans that have never bought a book in their lives.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

How do you even write a book when you have no idea what the inside of one even looks like? For all we know the inside of her book is hollowed out to hold a gun.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Step 1) Pay someone to write a book for you. Give them general notes about what you want in it, but they can come up with the details.

Step 2) Sell the book and (theoretically) get profits.

Optional Step 3) Pay your ghost writer. Hey, if you're following the Trump model, paying people for the work they do for you is optional.

[-] Binthinkin@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Nobody wants to launder money for her or ?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
236 points (90.7% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS