190
submitted 10 months ago by PeleSpirit@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 124 points 10 months ago

How have we come to point where Chris fucking Christie seems like a sensible choice out of a tray of crap?

The guy who closed down a public bridge to cause political harm to a rival. What a jerk.

[-] TheCrispyDud@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago

I feel like we've moved past just a tray of crap and right into the triceratops scene from Jurassic Park.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I don't like Christie either, but he's probably the most sane choice on the right at the moment.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

This is why u don't vote for ppl on the right.

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I wouldn’t trust any of these people to wander around unsupervised in my home. I sure as hell don’t want them having the nuclear football.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago

Well yeah, there’s that.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 91 points 10 months ago

What absolute hell, lol. There are no solutions to actually help the America people. Just insults, hate, and bullshit. Wtf man.

[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 62 points 10 months ago

New GOP mission statement: There are no solutions to actually help the America people. Just insults, hate, and bullshit.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 29 points 10 months ago

they needed something to pair with CPAC’s “We are all domestic terrorists.”

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

"We are all malicious, self-serving toads"?

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

New? Where have you been the last several decades?

[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Well, I think until recently it was "Don't say the quiet part out loud"

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I thought that was their 2020 platform

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It's been their platform since at least 1980.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

What did you expect?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The GQP don' need no steenking ideals, or goals, or logic, or sanity, or humanity. Just your votes and money.

Well, they'll just take those anyway.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

Rammy isn’t wrong when he says fascist neocon, but he is mistaken by assuming he must issue a caveat with the lipstick comment.

Women can be fascist neocons just as easily as men; see: Italy, France, etc. And that’s just in the past few years; I know I’m missing more.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah but Rammy is a fucking asshole, so it fits.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

No one is wrong, but they are all evil...

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Some are more evil than others…

Sucks none of these debates matter and only reinforces Trumps popularity. It’s impressive really: The man doesn’t have to do anything to be part of the Republican Party, yet, he continues to be the dominant and popular force in the party.

[-] Gruntyfish@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Pot. Kettle. Black.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 16 points 10 months ago
[-] betz24@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 10 months ago

Chris Christie is running again? Poor guy likes getting punched in the stomach.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Seems like he has no hope of winning, and is running to restore his "reasonable moderate" reputation that took a hit when he latched onto Trump like a mating anglerfish.

Maybe he's hoping for a spot in Haley's cabinet? Or just as a power broker in the post-Trump GOP, if that ever happens.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Dude just likes the attention

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Where a snake eats its own tail, there will always be entertainment.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago
[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"new conservatives," an older conservative movement in line with reagans bullshit. Lower taxes, american foreign policy can do no wrong, make puppy eyes at the troops while you fuck them over, bust any union you can, keep people desperate, gut services to lower taxes more, etc. The Bush's were neocons, as are Romney and Bob dole.

They have been usurped by the alt right in the current party. "Burn it down fuck you facist populists that want women pregnant and beaten, and want to shoot anyone in the street who they dont like. Keep taxes low because idk, you let me kills the gays and minorities again so do what you want with taxes" party. The Trump party.

This is an alt right shithead calling a neocon shithead a shithead.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty sure all conservatives want their 12 year old wiveS pregnant and in the kitchen

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Any Con that isn't drinking the MAGA koolaid in modern parlance. "Neocons" care about foreign policy and actually have principles, warped and weak as they may be, other than "I agree 100% with whatever Trump said this week".

Neocons are the Republicans tapdancing because Russia is being humiliated in Ukraine, while MAGAts are ready to give authoritarian countries free reign because they also loathe gay people.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

I looked up the definition, and it actually sounds like batshit nationalism.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Hahaha - they do not have principles, as has been proven over and over by their inability to hold criminals to account in their own party.

They use words that would otherwise indicate such, yes, but it's absolute utter bullshit. They DO NOT CARE about the law, or governance in any way, shape, or form that does not serve them personally. That's not having principles, that's a flaming hypocritical bag of shit.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Ah, you seem to have fallen under the false belief that "having principles = having good principles that I agree with". Neocons are not just mindlessly going around doing evil. They are evil in measured, predictable, logically consistent ways, with actionable goals.

[-] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Lawful evil, if you will.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I only know some about them but the main thing is that they support a STRONG military form of foreign policy to support “democracy”, stuff like George Bush on invading Afghanistan and Iraq. They support NATO and defending US interests cross the seas.

They’re basically the tankies of conservatism, with wanting to have tanks solve everything and denying their failures, but they kinda died out like a decade ago.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Found the gen z. I can't believe it took less than 20 years to forget/ not know.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

It speaks to how bad a disaster that ideology was that the generation born when it took control have never heard of it by the time they've become adults.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Millennial. And, I’ve never heard of neocon because it’s not used anymore since they’re all that now. So it’s just CONS

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
190 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS