245
Cancer vaccine with minimal side effects nearing Phase 3 clinical trials (abcnews.go.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Each shot would be completely personalized to the patient.

...

Wagner's TLPO cancer vaccine has been tested in hundreds of patients with advanced forms of melanoma in Phase 2 clinical trials.

The most recent data presented at an academic conference showed nearly 95% of people given only the vaccine were still alive three years after starting treatment and 64% were still disease-free. Among the most advanced forms of melanoma, disease-free survival after three years for people with stage III disease was 60% in the vaccine-only group, compared to about 39% in the placebo group. Disease-free survival for those with stage IV disease was about 68% in the vaccine-only group, and zero in the placebo group.

The most common side effects were redness or pain at the injection site, fever and fatigue after the injection – similar to other vaccines that stimulate an immune response.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TardisBeaker@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

They make it sound as if this is new, but this method has been studied for decades... My dad was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer in Jan of 2013. He happened to get into clinical trials that basically had him "living with cancer" for 5 years. It wasn't until the last few months that the cancer outpaced the drugs and took over, invading his brain, then it was only a matter of a very short time before the brain cancer ruptured & killed him. But prior to that, he got 5 years. The drugs he was on??? Targeted immunotherapy including a lot of mRNA vaccine therapy. (Turns out he was a guinea pig for the technology that would be used in Covid vaccines. He always hoped his clinical trials would help future patients, he just had no idea how far reaching that would really be.)

The problem is, cancer is in essence a mutation machine, which means it quickly outpaces our ability to create the vaccines. I think we'll get there; just going to take a while before we learn how to keep up.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago

For melanoma at the moment.

However, it is a TLPO vaccine which teaches your immune system one of the tricks cancer uses to evade being taken care of by your white blood cells. So it's application could be huge.

That said, as you might have noticed, it has to be personalized for the patient as it targets the specific way your cancer is hiding itself. Personalized medicine is still very expensive, but quickly being able to ID the specific sequence of DNA that gave your cancer it's hiding ability could be something that computers help us with one day.

So if this does get approved, it will likely be incredibly expensive per patient.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago

Almost every medical treatment we have was incredibly expensive when it first appeared, so I'm not terribly upset by that. As you say, the fundamentals of this are something that can be made a lot cheaper with advancing technology and mass adoption.

[-] Szymon@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 months ago

I know it's for scientific purpose and all, and they signed off on it, but what a bum fucking deal to get a placebo in that stage 4 group.

[-] TardisBeaker@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A lot of times they don't do placebo once the trial gets to that stage. My dad with cancer was a treatment guinea pig & one of the study stipulations was that they wouldn't get placebo. Too cruel to get their hopes up. ETA: I know this one states it had placebo group. And I understand the reason for it, obviously. Just saying my dad's experience was they promised no placebo group bc it was so late stage in testing.

[-] lightnegative@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

It could've gone the other way with worse outcomes for the medicine group.

In that case, you might want to be in the placebo group.

Either way it's a gamble

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

I've seen news of other experiments like this where once the treatment was so obviously working they flipped the placebo group over to the treatment as well out of compassionate grounds, but perhaps in this case the treatment is so expensive right now that they simply didn't have the resources to do that. So perhaps they went "our grant allows us to produce at most X number of doses of the real treatment for this, so let's take on 2X patients for it," and ended up saving the largest number of people they could have.

[-] Tvkan@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago

In later trials, drugs aren't compared against placebo, but a standard therapy regimen.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Placebo group for stage 3 cancer? How does it work? Is not it unethical?

[-] Machinist3359@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

While I don't know the case for this specific study, but you're assuming the vaccine is safe and works.

Generally though if it is shown to help they'll get it asap

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Disease-free survival for those with stage IV disease was about 68% in the vaccine-only group, and zero in the placebo group.

The placebo group will not be getting the vaccine.

Edit: The people not in Stage 4, may well get the advanced treatment.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly, and I thought there are alternative treatments in case of melanoma. Not giving those is clearly unethical. Stage 4 melanoma 5 year survival rates are not that bad, and clearly more than zero with treatment.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

You are right about the survival rates.

The paper is short, but a number of the patients had prior immunotherapy treatments (not all, and the rates are broken out by treatment, not by cancer stage.) The paper also does not seem to include the 0% survival rate for the Stage IV placebo group. (Or I missed it.)

I am making up things, but it is possible that other treatments had already failed and this was a "hail marry" for the Stage IV people.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -5 points 10 months ago

But how will Hospital CEOS and Pharma CEOs make money if they Cure Cancer instead of just Treat Cancer?

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

The longer people live, the more cancers they will ultimately develop. Win/win.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Hospital CEOs don't have a say in this and there will also still be a need for hospitals even if there is no cancer.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
245 points (99.2% liked)

News

23301 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world