254
They aren't teaching kids about climate change... WHAT? Am I the only one shocked by this? I definitely learned about global warming in school in the early 2000s.
Every other science fair project was about it! These mf's probably haven't even seen biodome.
It depends on the state I'm surprised in a blue state it's not taught. I learned about it in NH but there they care about the environment. They are the ones to push for no mercury in batteries. Mostly because of fishing and hunting but they cared at least.
MAGA happened since then...
We talked about climate change in every school year I can remember from 1985 > now
They should teach how the oil industry and its PR agencies lobbied and fomented denialism for decades to ensure that nothing would ever be done, so the kids know who to eat first when harvests really start failing.
Will they educate them about how greedy market capitalists knew they were causing it but covered it up for decades, and lobby still to prevent addressing it adequately so as to not to continue making it worse every single day because it would dig into their private profit expectations?
These kids deserve to know how fucked they are, how much we fucked their only habitat, and who is most responsible.
But we all know that won't happen. We'll be teaching them the glorious free market cures all ills as the planet burns around them and the sociopath families most responsible retreat to their luxury bunker complexes, mischief managed.
Over a century. The first papers linking fossil fuel emissions to potential climate change started being published in the very late 1890s/ early 1900s
now education is going to officially be a state by state issue without federal oversight
and if you are not educated enough to vote when you are old enough it will be your fault for not voting right
when are politicians, elected officials, and corporations going to be held accountable for dividing the US into fifty different countries all with different laws, policies, human rights, etcetera and not the people who are suffering under the boot of corporate owned politicians and "elected" officials
I'm starting to think we should seriously consider getting rid of all these "states"
Why would you want more federal oversight? States and school districts are far better at reacting in real time to the needs of their people than the federal government. Do you really want 9/11 taught in current events because a bunch of 60+ year old people believe history stops after WWII?
Education oversight has always been terrible, from no child left behind, to even student succeeds. The best your going to get is some standardized tests and lip service to educating everyone.
The federal government should be the last resort for any governing function.
so you want fifty different states deciding the people's fates depending on where they are and not a unified government?
think that would be the Disunited States of America
States are perfectly capable of working together, they already do it in tons of cases including education. Adding more federal oversight makes it worse in almost every case. It's not required that states actively fight each other unless told otherwise.
In the case of education there's already a few standards out there that are popular, common core is the current dominant one.
they work together these states?
there are border patrol like police on the borders of certain states to prevent people who are following another state's set of laws and policies from entering their state
Are they going to teach survival training? Because at this point there isn’t much else to learn if they are thinking they can prevent it. The change is already here.
Is not the kid who need to know about this, it is government who are controlled by lobbiests funded by wealthy cooperation, all of which need to be in prisons.
The hope is that kids will all learn it and grow up to be smarter than the assholes running things now.
Education of individuals is not the solution to systemic issues.
Education of individuals is the only way to have an educated populace.
Which is great if an educated populace is your goal. But my goal is to stop raising global average temperatures etc. Those things don't directly correlate (at best it may change some votes once the educated become voters, but politicians aren't super reliable either even when they do get in). I'm not saying I prefer ignorance, I am saying solutions that directly address the problems are the things that actually have a chance at working in a useful timeframe.
I actually think it is the longterm solution. If we had more people educated on the issue, we wouldn't have such a hard time getting support for shortterm actions we need right now.
Counterpoint: nutrition labels have done nothing for obesity in the US aside from shift responsibility from food manufacturers to individuals. Same with environmental stuff, you can educate people as much as you want but if the people with power have no desire to change (e.g. legislatures and corporations) then education doesn't really do anything. And they find ways to take over education with propaganda, like carbon footprints. I'm not saying ignorance is preferable, I'm saying education is not sufficient so there are better things to focus on in terms of solutions.
I'm saying education is not sufficient
Agreed, education is only part of the solution.
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
254 points (97.4% liked)
News
23296 readers
1239 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS