453
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Across America, clean energy plants are being banned faster than they're being built::The clock is ticking toward a deadline to meet renewable-energy standards. But USA TODAY's analysis finds local governments banning wind turbines, solar plants.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 182 points 9 months ago

“But a wave of disinformation in 2023, falsely claiming offshore wind projects killed whales, resulted in a sharp decline in public support for offshore wind.”

I can’t believe people fell for that.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 77 points 9 months ago

In Mexico we had a dumb politician who said windmills stole the air of the people.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mexico by way of south korea?

https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/01/fan-death-korean-moms-think-that-your-electric-fan-will-kill-you.html

People believe weird shit everywhere, unfortunately

Edit: couldn't get Wikipedia to give me the urban legend definition and not the metal band. Changed the link

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

All that air pushing the blades has to come from somewhere!

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

The current president of Mexico banned almost all.the eco technologies because od absurd ramblings like thst one of that politician, but his maim goal was to steal the money that the government invested in those.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 28 points 9 months ago

My dad was absolutely one of them... He mentioned it out of nowhere and I couldn't refute it because I had never encountered that lunacy before then...

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

He already wanted to hate wind then and this is just his justification. I once encountered someone telling me that wind turbines cause global warming. I told them the only part generating heat was the copper in the motor and that's the same in every power generation. Turn out Faux News misrepresented a study that showed the turbulence caused by wind turbines brought warm air to the ground level.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 9 months ago

You absolutely can refute it. Just ask for proof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 9 months ago

I hate that. They'll just say something like "well how can you support solar panels when it kills the rare ballet fork bird?! Or when the solar panels kill the nearby trees!? Or when the toxic chemicals leak into the streams and the kill the river!?"

It's just like this slew of crap and you can't possibly know it's totally crap when you start talking to them. Then you go back research it and it turns out it's from some (typically CCP or Russian financially backed) fake news website "pRoMOTinG fReeDoM aNd tHe AMeRicAn wAY."

Then they just don't want to hear about how freedom4everything.scam is a scam and think you're being political and close minded for insisting they check these things out and look for collaborating sources with more credibility, NYTimes, Washington Post, WSJ, etc.

Then that turns into a whole "but the NYTimes is too liberal to ever mention mutant fish caused by renewable energy" ... and it just goes on and on...

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago

I don't know how well it works in the end, but when I see that kind of stuff from people I usually say "I'm not going to tell you who to listen to, but try not to use sources that are named anything politically charged. No "patriot.grift" site no "RealMuricanDaily.bs" no "StarSpangledReport.asshat" anyone who chooses a name like that is broadcasting a political bias."

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

I can. There is a reason why only two new nuclear reactors have been built since 1972 in the nation that figured the technology out first. It takes almost nothing to scare people out of being smart

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

I mean... it's quite different for nuclear there has been some big international incidents and it's something that hurted people directly plus invisible stuff that can kill you usually is terrifying. Knowing that a similar technology is used for bombs that cause terrible destruction didn't help either.

So even though it can be done with no risks... Is quite understandable people being afraid of it.

Like the whale thing is nothing in comparison.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Everything you just said can apply to coal. There are monthly incidents involving coal mines and plants. It puts out plenty of stuff that is invisible and can kill you. Plus hydrocarbons are the lifeblood of all warfare almost as much as gunpowder.

Go spend a few years of your life building scrubbers for coal and low grade diesel then get back to me about how nuclear is dangerous. Bunch of rednecks with screwdrivers and drunk ex-Sovits with wrenchs. I have seen them do some scary stuff. At least with a nuclear plant you can't wipe your butt without ten PEs signing off on it.

[-] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The total death toll and the number of people suffering health issues (past and present) due to coal are orders of magnitude larger than those due to nuclear power (not to even mention the damage to the environment!). The problem is that people respond more to one-time big disasters than to numbers over time. Something like Chornobyl is terrifying and a big deal, so people remember it. They don't remember every Tom, Dick and Harry that's died over the years due to black lung or accidents or other stuff from coal.

You can even see this attitude in other ways too. It seems like a lot of Americans are still suffering mass trauma from 9/11 and accept the most horrific Patriot Act-type shit because of it. But in the end, it was less than 3000 people who died in the attack (and don't get me wrong, it was terrible!), but waaaaaaay more people die (and have died) from lack of (access to) healthcare, and it seems that still barely anyone is actually trying to fix that. Or a mass shooting that kills 11 people, that's a big deal, right? But the fact that over a million Americans died due to Covid didn't really register as a disaster for a lot of people.

Nuclear power is such a no-brainer to me, but it sounds 'scary' and lots of people don't understand it, which makes it even more scary. Plus, of course the fossil fuel industry propaganda and lobbying, and the memory of people who know other people who used to work in coal towns and had pretty decent lives. Or the "what about nuclear waste!"-crap that always comes up. Yes, nuclear waste is a thing, but let's put it next to all the damaging crap that coal mines produce, accumulated. It's way worse.

Anyway. It's hard to fight all that, even when rationally, statistically, nuclear power should be a no-brainer. Edit: and there is no political will either, it seems. Whether it's because they love their fossil fuel bribes or because they're too scared to lose some voters.. they'll never do good things just to do good.

Edit: just to be clear, it's definitely not a USA-exclusive problem. I currently live in Germany and their weird relationship to nuclear power is also batshit. All based on fear and bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The people falling for that are the ones trying to detox off of oxygen addiction.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 89 points 9 months ago

Wind mills do kill birds, but all you have to do to prevent it is paint one of the turbines black so it doesn't blend into the sky when it is turning, allowing birds to avoid them. But unfortunately thay costs money and smooth brain fossil fuel stans would rather just poison the wind rather than harness it.

[-] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 88 points 9 months ago
[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 18 points 9 months ago

wind energy is going to continue increasing exponentially for a while, it would be wise to mitigate the death of more birds. I also support exterminating stray cats and putting harsh fines on folks who keep outside cats as well. Birds need protecting and we are woefully failing as a species to do so.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Non-native lawns are a huge reason for the native bird decline across NA in the last 3 decades.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Non-native cats are multiple orders of magnitudes worse for bird populations. Non-native lawns mainly effect polinators.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Meh with non-native cats over here gone the native cats would do the killing. The reason we spay strays is more to protect wildcats against c competition, they're not interbreeding much but long-term it's a concern.

Obligatory picture and another yes they do look quite like domestic ones. Behaviour is quite different, though, particularly they're impossible to domesticate. Behaviour you'd consider severely fucked-up cat psychology in African wildcats (which are the ones who domesticated themselves by moving into grain storages) are par for the course for European wildcats. They're not asocial, they're not broken, they just hate humans.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I see your data clearly presented and submit my anecdotal. Clearly I win and we should burn more coal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The currently existing design of wind turbines is incredibly stupid anyway, I have no idea how we landed on that design. It's one of the least effective designs possible for it's use case. We should be using spiral turbines.

[-] Labrad0r@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

The current three blade design of utility-scale turbines achieves about 80% of the Betz limit, are relatively efficient in materials for their output, and the blades' pitch can be adjusted to control their speed in varying conditions (eg. during storms). I wouldn't call their design "incredibly stupid".

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

That looks like it would be hard to manufacture and transport at the size requirements that traditional blades are made. It's already a massive pita to transport the traditional blades. I'm sure we'll figure it out eventually, but that's probably the current reasoning.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

Yooo that looks sick as hell! Why aren't we using that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 48 points 9 months ago

Each time there's a new climate change fueled war, I'll remember who was spouting lies during this pivotal period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

OMG this is the dumbest thing.. In NY the town of Florida banned a windmill on waste property, then in racquet lake where they get all sorts of outages they stopped a battery from being installed because they might catch fire. These were BYD LFP batteries, and they were referencing LG chem batteries catching fire in Arizona as the reason.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 36 points 9 months ago

Are you kidding me? I opened the article in order to find reasons for banning but after like reading 10min, I gave up, it is such a repetitive article with so many useless words.. Has someone a TLDR?

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 37 points 9 months ago

Former President Donald Trump often denigrates wind and solar power in his speeches. In December in New Hampshire, he said, falsely, that wind farms only last 10 years, that they kill “all the birds,” that solar energy isn’t powerful enough to run factories and that wind is 42 times more expensive than natural gas.

(...)

“It’s going to change our lifestyle and the landscape and everything around here,” he said.

(...)

The opposition sometimes leads to surprising arguments about property rights, in which some landowners invoke concepts like a claim to a "viewshed" – views they want free of wind turbines or solar panels. These opponents clash with others who champion a different view of private property rights, saying landowners should be free to build what they want.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I see, the oil and coal lobby, who would have thought

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Cozied on up with Nimbys.

Nimbys are truly Karen's in their final form.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

Awful, we really need some kind of federal fast track for these sorts of badly needed projects that cuts through the NIMBY bullshit.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I mean, this isn't so bad. While the rest of the world lives in a solar punk future, the US could be like some secluded cyberpunk bubble that would give many scholars in the future stuff to write their thesis about, while also providing a good source of memes for the rest of enlightened humanity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] catch22@programming.dev 15 points 9 months ago

I live in one of the most progressive cities in the US and have had the same issue here. We have no driveway and park on the street but regulations say we cant use the grass strip (the area between the srreet and the curb) to install a charging station for an ev in front of our house. For 5 years we tried to get permission to do this without luck and have given up on ever getting an EV. I dont get how there is any hope for electric vehicles if there arent any working solutions for the millions of people in the United States who dont have a driveway or garage.

Its time to grab a beer kick back and watch as the planet is destroyed by slow moving bearacratic regulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Who knew that America was the very thing they taught us the enemy was when we were growing up.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
453 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
1925 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS