136
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 53 points 9 months ago

The bill lists specific actions that fall under the proposed definition: abuse against children that includes animal torture, bestiality or cannibalism, or forcing a child to ingest urine or feces, enter a coffin or grave containing a corpse, or take drugs as part of the ritual.

Wouldn't this include celebrating communion?

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

My first thought was "wow, flds is not gonna like this"

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Certainly seems like that could be an interpretation of the bill.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If not, you could start in on the ones with the baby dunking buckets. Judging by the cleanliness of their holy water, there's not a huge focus on hygiene. Probably some feces and urine swirling around in there which is likely to be ingested during the performance.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Depends. As far as I know only a few groups consider it to be literally body/blood and most are clear that they believe it to be symbolic. A lot of churches also just use grape juice now instead of wine so can't get them on drug use even if alcohol were considered a drug

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 6 points 9 months ago

Most non-Protestant denominations (Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, etc.) teach that it's a literal, miraculous physical change.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

Huh, didn't realize it was that wide spread. Well I retract my use of "only a few groups"

[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

Ritual abuse of a children: like,..indoctrination?

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, no, no. Not Christian rituals of abuse. Those are protected under freedom of (one) religion.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

is utah one of the state where you can marry children? sounds like ritual abuse to me

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

Don't they have a lot of conversion camps in Utah?

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Conversion camps, camps for rebellious teens, and other religious based camps.

Lots of emotional abuse mixed in with physical abuse is normal in the state.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

So they're finally outlawing infant circumcision?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Ritual abuse of children is no longer legal in Utah? Wouldn’t have been in my 40 first guesses for first state to institute a minimum age for church attendance but good for them!

[-] dueuwuje@aussie.zone 11 points 9 months ago

Does that include circumcisions?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 8 points 9 months ago

Their testimony included the stuff of nightmares: [I have opted to exclude the list] — assaults so physically and emotionally traumatic that the victims said they repressed memories of their abuse.

It is good to note that recollection of events past is increasingly difficult, to the point that it is not only possible but quite easy to invent memories or have memories implanted by someone skilled in the art of suggestion.

I'm not saying there aren't people who have experienced ritual abuse, but especially where the "satanic" is concerned, it's often difficult to gauge the credibility of sources' memories, especially if they were children when it allegedly happened (children often lack the language and experience to properly understand what happened to them) and especially during a moral panic like we are currently experiencing.

But then, Republicans don't care about source credibility, as long as it helps propel them into authoritarian power.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Sexual abuse is aok though! ❤️

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Be careful: they may be intending to declare that Critical Reasoning class is "ritual abuse of children".

Wait & see how they actually apply it.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

So child abuse is fine, but they draw the line at rituals?

[-] cygon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

How long until they bring back the bullshxx from the 90s with "regression therapy" that implants the deranged fears of conservative parents in children as if they had been abused for real?

How long until they dig up streets and school basements again in search for "satanic tunnels?"

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After an evening of emotional testimony from activists, self-described victims and law enforcement officials, lawmakers in Utah are moving forward with a bill that would criminalize so-called ritualistic child sexual abuse — a codification critics say is unnecessary and potentially harmful.

Their testimony included the stuff of nightmares: devil worship, animal torture, forced bondage, rape, cannibalism, child prostitution and mind control — assaults so physically and emotionally traumatic that the victims said they repressed memories of their abuse.

Koen has appeared on dozens of podcasts over the years to tell her story: that she was tortured and forced to participate in human sacrifice as part of satanic cult rituals led by family members, neighbors and church leaders.

Smith has defended the integrity of his investigation and told lawmakers Wednesday that his yearslong probe into ritual sexual abuse in the state had made him a laughingstock, but that he believed the accusers.

Utah’s proposed bill and the county sheriff’s investigation have attracted national interest from conservative media and an online network of conspiracy theorists who believe this case will prove that the allegations that fueled the 1980s satanic panic were true all along, and that cabals of satanists are still sexually abusing, murdering and cannibalizing children.

California, Illinois and Idaho were among the earliest states to pass laws criminalizing ritual abuse in response to 1980s claims of satanic threats to children, primarily in day care settings, deYoung said.


The original article contains 1,414 words, the summary contains 237 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
136 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS