563
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan declined a request to grant a stay after a jury ordered Donald Trump to pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million for defamation.

"Twenty-five days after the jury verdict in this case, and only shortly before the expiration of Rule 62's automatic stay of enforcement of the judgment," Kaplan noted. "Mr. Trump has moved for an 'administrative stay' of enforcement pending the filing and disposition of any post-trial motions he may file. He seeks that relief without posting any security."

"The Court declines to grant any stay, much less an unsecured stay, without first having afforded plaintiff a meaningful opportunity to be heard," the judge wrote in his one-page order.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 7 months ago

Imagine getting told by a judge that you're liable for rape, and then turning around and asking the judge if you can skip out on your rape-payment.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 41 points 7 months ago

Because he didn’t do it, you see, and if he did, it’s because she deserved it. He’s upset because for some reason the judge and the rest of the world don’t understand this and it’s not fair to him.

I hate how not far from the truth this most likely is.

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

It’s insane how our legal system works. Overly complex and benefits those who can afford the best lawyers. The prison system in the USA is also really messed up. I don’t understand how we’ve managed to turn everything, literally everything, into a squeeze on the classes to get every last cent from every angle. People are sick of ‘hustling’ and want justice, equality, opportunity to work and provide for their own. Sigh.

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

In summary "put up or shut up"

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 36 points 7 months ago

Given it's a defamation case, I think it's both!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

And we know he’s incapable of either.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

Lol this made me snort orange juice out of my nose. Fuck it buuuuurrrrnnns!

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Up and at them!

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 7 months ago

Must admit I'm quite enjoying the last few weeks of Trumps legal woes.

I wonder what's on the agenda for March. Hopefully Jack Smith is limbering up for something special.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

I hope one of the many, many court actions against him actually manages to make him face some real consequences that will cause a measurable impact on him and his behaviour.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 7 months ago

I think we're seeing that right now?

He's obviously deeply upset about the outcome of the NYC thing. I don't think he cares about the criminal aspects but having to pay $450m in penalties is a bitter pill.

Impacting his behavior is a difficult one. He tends to just double down when things go wrong. I do like to think that his opportunities will start to diminish. By that I mean it's possible that a few wealthy power brokers might decide that they're not going down with his sinking ship.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 7 months ago

Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 7 months ago

Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Looks like it's up to the state of New York; the federal criminal stuff looks dead in the water. The Supreme Court is just going to sit on the DC case and Judge Cannon is in the process of strangling the Florida one.

[-] porksoda@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"Am I a joke to you?" - Georgia

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago
[-] norbert@kbin.social 31 points 7 months ago

$83 million is nothing to a stable genius business tycoon like Don right?

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

It's a paltry 207,500 pairs of ugly-ass shoes

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 26 points 7 months ago

Isn't she already working on pulling him into court for a third time? He didn't stop talking shit about her after the first and this verdict. I seriously hope they have some "third time" laws laws there.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago

The legal system is bananas. Appeals are one thing, an "administrative stay of enforcement" 25 days after the judgement is just confusing. I don't understand why that would get approved in any scenario.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It gets approved often, especially if the remedy is something other than monetary compensation. For example, if the remedy is that the court granted specific performance of a contract by a non-performing party, that's not like money where if it turns out to be granted by mistake it can be given back

There was zero chance it was going to be granted in this case and any competent lawyer would know that, especially before Judge Kaplan.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago
[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

That's not what that term means.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago
[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

"A banana republic is a politically unstable country whose economy depends on the export of one product in limited supply, such as agricultural products like bananas or minerals"

The literal first sentence from wikipedia. It's a specific kind of exploited state. Using it as a catch-all for unpopular or unstable governments dilutes the terminology. Which is what's happening, as shown by the rest of the wiki page. It's not, like, an official classification and you're not the only one to denigrate the US with that label but it seems dishonest and reductive. Our problems are largely internal and would exist with no foreign influence or global economy.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

Why is Trump doing this? He's a BILLIONAIRE SUPER GENIUS BUSINESSMAN! Just pay her the money Don you'll make it back Tomorrow!

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago
[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

We call 'im Donny Jingles!

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Boo hoo orangetard!

[-] jobby@lemmy.today 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

“Your Honor my client would like to” “NOPE!”

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I would not want to be GoFundMe's ethics team right now...

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
563 points (98.8% liked)

News

23190 readers
2897 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS