573
XXX (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by brt01010101@sh.itjust.works to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 238 points 6 months ago

Because there's another mass shooting every couple days. It's hard to care about why one dude did something crazy 7 years ago while bullets are still flying. People are much more focused on trying to stop the next one.

[-] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 176 points 6 months ago

I agree with all of that, except for the part about people being focused on trying to stop the next one.

If anyone was actually serious about that, we wouldn't average more than one per day across the U.S.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 116 points 6 months ago

Focused on trying to stop the next one in every way except restricting guns, or funding mental health care, or reducing hate, or... Well anything that takes more than thoughts and prayers.

What a country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 93 points 6 months ago

We have tried nothing and we are all out of options.

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago

Gotta appreciate how I Googled that phrase, clicked on the first YouTube link, and the very first comment was along the lines of “US conservatives reacting to mass shootings”

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Hux@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 months ago

At some point, a long time ago, we collectively transitioned from viewing mass shootings as an alarming epidemic, to something culturally endemic to our way of life. It’s an effortless rationalization made possible by for-profit news and for-profit politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 months ago

People are much more focused on trying to stop the next one.

Are they really? What is really being done?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Disagreed. No one gives a shit about stopping the next one. We'd actually have stricter gun laws if that were true.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 190 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If Americans can be numb to mass killings of elementary school children, Vegas never stood a chance of remaining in the public discourse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 135 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So fun fact

The reason why it was the deadliest shooting is because the shitstain was using a bump stock, which makes semiautomatics into pseudo-automatics, so he just mag dumped into a crowd

After it happened, the Trump admin of all fucking people banned bump stocks. Broken clock or something.

Now SCOTUS is about to hear a court case to repeal the ban, and they look poised to legalize bump stocks again under the BS reason that "they're not technically automatic weapons"

With the added bonus that now everyone knows about them

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not trying to minimize the bump stock thing but I would wager that having 23 different guns and hundreds of rounds of ammo is why so many people got shot that night. This guy had it all planned out including bipods, red dots, cameras etc. this guy even went as far as to nailing his door shut so in any case someone got to his hotel before he was done, he would have extra time.

Yeah the bump stocks made a difference but I don't think it was by that much.

https://www.ktnv.com/news/las-vegas-shooting/list-guns-and-evidence-from-las-vegas-shooter-stephen-paddock

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

For those of us who don't wank ourselves to sleep every night to pictures of guns and have no idea what the fuck a bump stock is -

Essentially, bump stocks assist rapid fire by "bumping" the trigger against one's finger (as opposed to one's finger pulling on the trigger), thus allowing the firearm's recoil, plus constant forward pressure by the non-shooting arm, to actuate the trigger

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Yeah that's fair, the guy was armed to the teeth. The bump stock is just the icing on the shit cake.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] poprocks@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

A SCOTUS that Trump installed.

[-] DABDA@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

No hardware required, also not some new technique suddenly discovered:
How to Bump Fire an AR-15/M4
AK47 bump fire

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 109 points 6 months ago

Never found a motive? Are you joking? We've got tons of info on the psycho who did it. He was a distraught aging white male with a history of depression, gambling, and firearms who wanted to hurt the world and kill himself.

Sad losers are a dime a dozen but at least most of them aren't as stupid as that guy. There is no reason to discuss this outside of proposed changes to our society as a whole to better prevent these stains on history.

[-] Sentient@sh.itjust.works 33 points 6 months ago

Ahh yes no need to discuss why people become who they are or to change society for the better

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

I don't mean to sweep this under the rug, but I think that just stands as another case for the fact that an enormous amount of people in this country have mental health issues. It's normalized at this point.

Besides that, news outlets that report on this only do so basically of the drama and the views. The solutions are in front of us, always have been, but that's not what anyone truly cares about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Depressed white male dressed as a policeman: So, why did you do it?

Mass shooter: because I'm a depressed white male

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 65 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well I can't speak for anyone else, but me personally I never talk about it because I don't talk about mass shootings in general.

But occasionally I do think about that one. And Sandy Hook. And Aurora. And Uvalde. And Columbine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 6 months ago

This question was posted with a Wikipedia link. I didn't read it, but let's assume it didn't answer the poster's question.

Now I see in the comments a people saying "we know a lot" (but not Wikipedia I guess) or "it's just what Americans do" or "we got some good laws out of it". It just sounds like "move along, move along" to me.

Nobody answered the question. I don't know the answer, but to say that a person who has never killed anyone before then planned and executed the biggest mass shooting in American history (and that's saying something!) and we shouldn't CARE about motive is just weird.

What makes someone arm themselves and go to a movie theater or an elementary school or a concert should be damned important to a society that cares about mental health and the safety of its citizens. It's SO EASY to say "evil" and put it in the past, especially when the perpetrator is dead. It's much harder to think about how to prevent the next one. Sure, they use guns. But then it's knives. Or hammers. Slower you say? Well then how about sarin gas? Mail bombs? Potassium cyanide in Tylenol? Letters containing ricin?

We need to know more about the psychology of the mass killer. We act like saying "evil" is good enough. Are we all religious now? There's devils out there? Or are they people, people with problems that never got recognized, until it was too late?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

"What makes someone arm themselves and go to a movie theater or an elementary school or a concert should be damned important to a society that cares about mental health and the safety of its citizens."

For whatever reason, these people feel scorned, and rejected. They're full of rage, and they decide to take it out on everyone around them. There's usually a shitload of narcissism involved. Narcissists don't take rejection well.

I personally know one of these people. He spends every night alone, because no one wants to be around him, filling his head with hate and fear from Fox and YouTube right wing grifters. He goes out of his way to provoke everyone around him with Nazi and Klan jokes, and sticks his phone with Nazi and Klan memes in everyone's face, like an overgrown 15 year old edgelord. He's 53. But he's not the asshole, everyone else is. Everyone is fucking with him, not vice versa. He has a house full of guns, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if he went on a shooting spree if someone provoked him into narcissistic rage.

I'm seriously considering reporting him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] BURN@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

For the most part Americans are so desensitized to the gain Violence that it’s not something most of us think about much.

I’ve grown up in a post Columbine world, and mass shootings have been a part of my life since it started. They’re just a really unfortunate part of life here that won’t change unless there’s a massive culture shift.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It is impossible to type out all of the reasons, but here are a few. Check out Bowling for Columbine btw - a movie from two thousand fucking two, 15 years BEFORE that particular one. We've seen that particular bullet coming for a LONG time, and the ones before it, and the ones after it, and the ones yet to come - we KNOW, yet we do NOTHING. Most especially the "Pro-Life" crowd.

Lobbying. It's a thing. The NRS especially is one of the more powerful ones. More than 80% of American citizens - rising to >90% of NRA members even!!! - want some form of extremely limited gun control. However, we do not live in a democracy, not even one dominated by conservatives or rural Americans - rather, we live in a plutocracy where despite the OVERWHELMING support of the VAST MAJORITY of Americans, we cannot manage to get anything done.

Also, much of that money supposedly flowing to politicians from the "NRA" actually has been found to have ties back to Russia. Many of the politicians receiving that money may not even know the true source of where it came from - nor do they particularly seem to care.

Oh, and then billionaires bought up pretty much all of the major news outlets (a handful of others still exist - did The Guardian escape that? Well, even if they were, they seem to be allowed to talk about other corporate take-overs (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/may/03/billionaires-extra-power-media-ownership-elon-musk).

And hopefully you already know what happened to Google, where SEOs took over the searches so that it is nearly impossible to find things that just five years ago were easily retrievable, with the only lingering hold-out being Reddit, before then that whole thing happened...

BTW, the government is literally not allowed to collect statistics on how many violent gun deaths occur in America. I am not sure if this is the video where Jordan Klepper showcases that, but if not then he has a bunch of others. Or take your pick - there are millions if not billions of videos, of varying degree of quality and relevance. I've never seen one show a truly "unbalanced" take though - that is just not how for-profit corporations work. You just have to educate yourself by watching a bunch of stuff until you know how trustworthy the source is, and also each and every material topic too. It is sad, but we cannot seem to trust any (especially for-profit) advice these days. Though if you want another recommendation, there's John Oliver's whole expose on the NRA. To provide a modicum of balance, on the other side there are series such as Paul Harrell's Mass Shootings: Causes and Possible Solutions.

And - yes there is always more - there are other arguments such as: "if someone cannot get a gun they will simply make their own bomb" (ignores how much harder it is to do that), and the whole thing of plastic ghost guns (again ignores how difficult it would be to do that). Ultimately, i think that children being sacrificed is itself merely a symptom of a much deeper cause. People on Lemmy call it "capitalism", which has a LOT of truth to it - but then again, nations such as communist China have their own different issues. But, again, since ~90% of Americans already are in favor of stopping these kinds of mass-shootings, this will not be solved by merely educating yourself or "getting the word out". In fact, this type of issue is precisely the type of thing that Trump leaned heavily on as his route to the White House - "Hillary Clinton is corrupt so you should elect me and I will get rid of all the corruption, everywhere". So realistically, this is just something that we are going to simply have to live with, unless and until people fucking DO something about it. e.g. a responsible gun owner could patrol their own neighborhood schools. However, do note that every time someone does try to do that, they end up shooting innocent people instead, and yet it does nothing to stop the actual shooters, who can pull guns out of a bag (long-ish violin or trumpet case maybe?) and start shooting in mere seconds - not enough time to notice and prevent it. So start by educating yourself, since that's really all you can do, and also it will help enormously to ensure that you are on the correct side of the issue.

For those so inclined, there is a verse commanding the latter point even in the actual Holy Bible, at 1 Thessalonians 5:21: "Test EVERYTHING against what you KNOW to be true". I don't know what can be done, after the education stage, but I know it MUST begin with that.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

I already sent the thoughts and prayers what more do you want from me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 37 points 6 months ago

Nothing new in the case. People have moved on to other things.

I still find that a strange case.

[-] fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

I was just thinking about it.

I think the motive was the guy was angry at the world and wanted to kill as many people as possible before killing himself.

A man that feels he has nothing to lose is a dangerous thing.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A man that feels he has nothing to lose is a dangerous thing.

Billionaires with nothing to gain but money for moneys sake are far more dangerous, it’s just they are going to kill your loves ones with crushing debt or an opioid prescription not a bullet.

Between 1999 and 2015, around 350,000 people died from opioid addiction related deaths in the US.

350,000

Guess whether any of the Sacklers went to jail who knowingly pushed opioid prescriptions in situations where it was dangerous or unnecessary based rational from studies conducted to purposefully sell more opioids?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827319300096#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20CDC%2C%20there,counties%20from%201999%20through%202015.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 18 points 6 months ago

A man that feels he has nothing to lose is a dangerous thing.

There is no defense against the berserker.

-- Sir Terry Pratchett

Anyone with no regard for their own safety and a will to harm others is always dangerous

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

There was seemingly no political motive so there's no real reason to report on it anymore

I searched it a week ago to check how many people israel killed during their flour massacare. Because both involved shooting bullets into dense crowds.

The hotel massacare killed 60 people

Israel's flour massacare killed 120 people.

So that basically sums up. The hotel massacare wasn't "that big of a deal".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The guy didn't say or post much directly about it. Sometimes people do crazy shit for very little reason. You couple that with the ability to get guns easily, mass quantities of ammo, and bump stocks, you have yourself a bloody stew.

People love patterns, but sometimes there just isn't one. There is no single profile for a mass shooter. The closest you get is male and either 15-24 or 35-44.

Most people shoot others for grievances and having a shitty life. Sometimes not though. Many shooters don't even take their own life. Plenty of them are still on the run.

The easiest answer is that the vast majority of how our society runs is through the fear or threat of death. The moment someone starts wanting it, they're capable of nearly anything.

Most people see the greener pasture of nothingness between the loop of a noose at home. Some decide to kill and maim before they go out.

Unfortunately because of the 2nd amendment, it lets people rampage easily with high body counts before dying

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There is a 4 part documentary series called "11 Minutes" from 2022.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22042292/

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago

I figured it got swept into the lone gunman category after all the details about Saudi arms deals and help smuggling the guns in got out. It's kinda like the Epstein case.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago

ZERO Fetuses died so why would I care?

-Pro Life Republican making Books Illegal to Save The Children!

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 months ago

nobody ever talks about enron anymore. The CEO only got like 5 years for that. Nobody talks about nortel anymore, the CEO got no time for that, and a shit ton of money, all the employees had no pension.

Etc, etc, etc...

[-] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

It’s part of Vegas’ branding strategy.

What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rouxdoo@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

The dumb motherfucker who did this was just a homicidal twat. There was no "reason" or manifesto that was given, it was just some whack-job wanting to kill lotso-people.

Gun control is a joke in America...I'm sad about that.

[-] froh42@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My neighbor country, the Czech Republic also has very permissive gun control laws - it has a lot less shooting incidents per capita than the US.

So, while gun control is one thing that's really missing and should be done, there's more going on - sometimes you read the word "mental health crisis"

Tbh, I also know a lot of dumb motherfuckers, but in the US a larger amount of dumb motherfuckers seem to become homicidal twats.

Saying he's just a whack-job wanting to kill lotso-people is not enough, why the fuck does this happen so frequently?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago

In 2024 there have been more "mass shooting events" in the US than there have been days in 2024.

One that happened 7 years ago isn't top of mind for most people.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

This, like any event, comes down to what the family does to keep a case going. There’s many cold cases that are now getting solved by family members rather than police.

There is no agency out there that will keep interest in an issue.

once the media is done with it(they have a super short attention span) and the police will spend all of a few weeks on most things it is the family that keep the interest going. They will pay out of pocket to get attention for it.

There’s even cases where family members that have investigated into commercial air craft incidents because they lost loved ones and helped solve cases on that.

Believe it or not there are people calling the police every day just to keep their attention on a missing person or murder, asking for new leads. These are family members.

Police will not do this on their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago

Eminem wrote a song about it so that's not nothing

[-] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Yep. Hard to listen to as it uses audio from the shooting so you're hearing real people panic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

It was all over the news and years ago. Should we continue talking about it?

[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Without any right wing or left wing boogie man traits to point at, the news cycle just moved on to the next shooting that occurred the following day.

They never found a solid motive, so unless there's some political points to score then the US media doesn't care.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Minotaur@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Kind of answered this one yourself. There’s no clear motive other than “weird loner gambling addict decides to commit an atrocity”, and there’s just not much to say on the matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
573 points (96.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35281 readers
753 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS