104
Nobel laureate economist savages his own profession as clueless and unethical (www.crikey.com.au)
submitted 7 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 53 points 7 months ago

“Historians, who understand about contingency and about multiple and multidirectional causality, often do a better job than economists of identifying important mechanisms…”

This is why politics, economics, and history should not be studied independently. It’s why Marx’s critique of classical political economy was that it lacked historical specificity. If economic laws are investigated in the same way as natural laws of physics or biology, then they will appear natural and unchangeable. But economies do change over time, they aren’t eternal and therefore can only be accurately understood in historical context, as transient laws of the current time and place.

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 32 points 7 months ago

Yep. From even before Adam Smith up through Marx, economics wasn’t really this separate discipline. The social sciences were interdisciplinary, and people who studied political economy understood it in a broader context.

But the “problem” was, those political economists (certainly Marx yes, but plenty others; Marx didn’t operate in a vacuum) started to draw some uncomfortable conclusions about capitalism. In comes the marginalist revolution and neoclassical economics. While a lot of these marginalist economists did go on to criticize Marx specifically (i.e. Bohm-Bawerk), really I don’t see the marginalist legacy as something that attempted to “debunk” Marx & co per se. More about ending political economy as a pursuit, and narrowing the focus of “economics” on things like government fiscal and monetary policy. Even in the “debate” between subjective and labor theories of value, I don’t think the SVT is even “wrong”, it just doesn’t tell us anything interesting. It basically says we’re not going to trouble ourselves with understanding the bigger things, we’re just gonna say that wherever price and quantity intersect in a stable situation is “equilibrium”. Killing political economy was what capital needed to get people to stop questioning the economic system and instead focus this new “economic” science on how to be a tool for capital.

[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Even in disciplines like physics, it is known that one simple set of rules can not be extrapolated to explain all circumstances. The study of aerodynamics separates mechanics into several 'regimes,' because things behave quite differently under subsonic and supersonic conditions. A similar dichotomy exists between traditional Newtonian mechanics and relativity. If the market oracles getting spit out by the Chicago School are treating economics like physics, they are the type of physicist who still upholds the plum pudding model.

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 10 points 7 months ago

they are the type of physicist who still upholds the plum pudding model

It’s worse than that, even. The plum pudding model IIRC was always understood to be an approximation.

Vulgar economy is less forgivable. It is essentially anti-scientific, by rejecting the possibility of economic laws which are not identical with appearances. The vulgar economists are like astronomers still clinging to the Ptolemaic system (geocentric model), because the sky in fact appears to rotate about the earth. Marx here plays the role of Galileo, using science to prove that there are deeper laws governing the motions of celestial objects.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

💯

[-] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 7 months ago

My (apparently) most controversial take is economics in the way it's discussed with a capitalist framing by economists is made up. Literally none of it is based in reality, and it's just used to enrich capitalists and act as a barrier to actual change for the benefit of all humans. Eg "The GDP of the USSR in 1955..." type shit that I somehow see people "on the left" saying a lot. It's so prevalent in society to think of everything in these bullshit terms and ways and locks everyone into this mindset of "but if GDP no go up... how good?" Shit just annoys me.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 27 points 7 months ago

western economists are just clowns coming up with excuses to justify rich people's feelings

[-] D61@hexbear.net 10 points 7 months ago

me screaming Ceteris paribus in a crowded lecture hall as I slowly shrink and turn into a cob of corn

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 20 points 7 months ago

I don't think GDP is an inherently 'bad', its just that it doesn't really show everything. It doesn't show how the GDP is distributed (per-capita is just an average) or the environmental/social aspects.

this article is a pretty good read

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 21 points 7 months ago

GDP made a lot more sense to me after I finished vol. 2 of Capital. In a very loose and non-literal sense, I think GDP reflects the amount of surplus value floating around in an economy. The US has a high GDP but when you consider that production is the only source of value (that’s part of where vol 2 comes in) how does that make sense? It’s because the US “steals” surplus value from the global south. The US economy (the non-financial part of it, at least) is a merchant capitalist economy. The US doesn’t make anything - Nike, Apple, Gap, Walmart, etc… none of them make hardly anything in-house much less in the US. Contractors in the global south are where most of the production happens and thus that’s where the value is created, but the hegemonic position of the US as sort the the ultimate merchant capitalist with nuclear weapons , means the production side gets squeezed out of their surplus value and it’s moved to the US with the product. And GDP largely aligns with these flows of value, products, and money.

[-] AFineWayToDie@hexbear.net 36 points 7 months ago

Every economist is either a socialist or an idiot.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 36 points 7 months ago

I think a lot of them are just propagandists.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 7 months ago

Popes, bishops, deacons of neoliberal orthodoxy. I cannot make up my mind whether they are shameless liars or if they believe their own lie, not that it functionally makss a difference.

[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 17 points 7 months ago

Oh they believe it. Their subjective reality based on their material conditions makes it seem true to them.

[-] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago

When you get good at economics you start calling it political economy.

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 23 points 7 months ago

Reminds me of when Piketty opened his first big book trashing US economics

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago

All right, Sir Deaton gets a Bowtie Pass. As long as he keeps saying cool things!

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
104 points (100.0% liked)

news

23527 readers
653 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
FidelCastro@hexbear.net
Alaskaball@hexbear.net
SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
carpoftruth@hexbear.net
GinAndJuche@hexbear.net
Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net