400
submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Texas appeals court has thrown out a five-year prison sentence for Crystal Mason, a Texas woman who was sentenced for trying to cast a provisional ballot in the 2016 presidential election that was rejected.

Mason, now 49, attempted to vote in Fort Worth in the 2016 even though she was ineligible because she was still on supervised release – which is like probation – for a tax felony. She has always maintained she had no idea she was ineligible and only tried to cast a ballot because her mother urged her to.

A judge convicted her in a 2018 trial that lasted just a few hours.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 116 points 7 months ago

Glad they threw out her 5 year prison sentence from 2018 in 2024.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

For nearly the entire time, she remained out of prison pending the outcome of her appeal.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So what? That's six years of a major life problem she did not deserve. 40k is horseshit (if she's even successful in getting it awarded), no matter how it may compare to options in other states.

And I'll say it - I don't believe for one second she'd have had this over her head all this time had she been a white registered Republican.

After Mason was arrested in 2017, she lost her job at a bank. She was also sent back to federal prison for several months for being arrested while on probation for a federal crime. During that time, she almost lost her home to foreclosure.

“Although I’ve cried for seven years straight, seven nights a week … I’ve also prayed for seven years straight, seven nights a week. Prayed that I would remain a free black woman,” she said in a statement.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago

You are correct. There are multiple cases of white Repubs committing voting fraud with full mens rea and they get a slap on the wrist if anything.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I replied to the suggestion that overturning a five year sentence would be meaningless after six years. In this case it's not meaningless at all.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Ah sorry, misdirected hostility over this effed up system.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 107 points 7 months ago

Iirc, she cast a provisional ballot, she wasn’t certain and asked whoever, in full openness.

If her vote was even counted, then it wasn’t her mistake.

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 63 points 7 months ago

Never mind that the whole point of a provisional ballot is "I don't know if this vote is valid, but here it is just in case it is valid"

I feel like casting a provisional ballot should protect you in cases like hers, not condemn you!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

She asked and was told she was allowed to do so by an election official. I don't know what else she was supposed to do.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago

She probably should have just tried being rich and/or white. It's not that hard.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 68 points 7 months ago

SILLY Woman! She should have just tried to Overthrow the United States Government! She would have gotten LESS time!

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

The best part is that an employee of the state told her she could vote, therefore the state told her she could vote, and they imprisoned her anyway.

It's basically entrapment.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

The first vice chairman of the Georgia Republican party, Brian Pritchard, just got convicted of deliberately voting illegally nine times, and got sentenced to...

(...wait for it...)

...a $5000 fine.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

And those nine votes were still counted.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 65 points 7 months ago

I'm glad she has finally been acquitted but I am so sorry that she ever had to go through any of this

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Serves her right for being brown!!

(/s in case it's not evident)

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 48 points 7 months ago

Losing the right to vote is ridiculous.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Agreed. Felons should be allowed to vote. Pirsoners should be allowed to vote. Just because you committed a crime doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to participate in a democratic election. There is, as far as I can remember, nothing in the Constitution that bars felons or the incarcerated from voting.

Not to mention that people in jail waiting for trial who can't afford bail aren't allowed to vote either if the election happens while they're in jail, even though there's been no conviction.

[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In Germany there are only a few crimes that take away your voting rights and I am fine with these:

  • preparation of a war of aggression and high treason against the Federation
  • treason and disclosure of state secrets with intent to cause damage
  • attacks against organs and representatives of foreign states
  • disruption of election process and falsification of election documents
  • bribing delegates
  • sabotage against means of defence or intelligence activity endangering national security (provided that a sentence of imprisonment is imposed for at least one year in this case).

source

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

disruption of election process and falsification of election documents

Seems like a good one. We should borrow that.

bribing delegates

I'll have you know it's called lobbying and it's perfectly legal! For some reason.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Especially when prisoners are counted toward a state's apportionment. Now you end up with evil conservative scumbags petitioning to have prisons in their states/districts so they get those extra resources, without all of those damn liberal votes.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

It’s essentially the modern equivalent of the 3/5ths compromise.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

They aren't even trying to hide it because you can legally use prisoners as slaves.

[-] cmg@infosec.pub 3 points 7 months ago

https://www.npr.org/podcasts/1100064032/deliberate-indifference

It’s definitely there because of the same politics.

[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 7 months ago

Mason’s case became well known nationally and struck a chord as an example of an egregious punishment for a voting mistake. Many saw it as a thinly veiled effort to intimidate Black voters.

Ya think?!

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Thank God she didn't try to buy the presidency.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
400 points (99.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
2019 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS