120
submitted 6 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 1917isnow@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

That just means we need to order 50% more F-35s I see no problem here. This is job creation.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

But all the lib YouTubers told me that the F-35 is good, actually! capitaldcolon

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

something something paper tiger

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

paper plane*

[-] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

https://youtu.be/hlC2ADUtAzk

The F-35 is relatively cheap for its capabilities. It's really more like 3 different planes that happen to share a few parts, and it would absolutely dominate against any fighter that came before it. Russia and China are extremely interested in getting the US public to hate the airplane specifically because it's so good. There's a reason everyone else is buying F-35s from us and pretty much nothing else.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

LMFAO good one

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago

There’s a reason everyone else is buying F-35s from us and pretty much nothing else.

Correct. Same way apple was really interested in selling people the i-phone 5. It's overly designed proprietary junk that barely works, but is extremely expensive to purchase and is very profitable for the seller.

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

news

23540 readers
732 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS