353
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 120 points 6 months ago

This is great news since it officially establishes that Johnson has a dependency on Democrats now. Which gives Dems more leverage because if Johnson refuses to cooperate on something in the future than Dems could bring a motion to vacate the chair.

[-] ignirtoq@fedia.io 70 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I was frustrated with Greene saying "Democrats saved him," because with the infinitesimal majority they have, it would be the Democrats who ousted him if they voted the other way. Republicans basically have no agency in their choice of Speaker anymore, thanks largely to the chaos and dysfunction caused by her faction.

[-] meleecrits@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

It also shows how toothless the extreme MAGA side is. Democrats and moderate Republicans made bipartisan deals to get aid passed and this troglodyte can't abide compromise. She genuinely thinks compromise is evil.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 23 points 6 months ago

I think you're giving her too much credit. She just wants chaos and attention.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Correct. She must be fuming because she thought she had that kind of power - and she doesn't.

I have a small sliver of suspicion that many Democrats voted to help Johnson in order to put her in her place.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I know as a rule of thumb anything Marjorie is for I am most likely against.

Broken clocks, aside.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Wake up, babe. New voting coalition just dropped.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago

Can they also just reject her?

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No sooner than Greene triggered the vote on her motion to vacate the speaker from his office, the Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise countered by calling first for a vote to table it.

An overwhelming majority, 359-43, kept Johnson in his job, for now.

The House voted nearly immediately to resolve something. How often does that happen? That is a resounding rejection.

There are mechanisms for Congress to expell members, but that's unlikely to come up Santos for her.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

The House voted nearly immediately to resolve something. How often does that happen? That is a resounding rejection.

Everyone is just sick if her bullshit it seems. Except her constituents, they love that shit.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 34 points 6 months ago

In another thread, someone referred to her as Perjury Traitor Greed, and I'm just here to make that more popular.

[-] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

My favorite is Marjorie Trailer Queen

[-] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

Mine was Margerine Trailer Grease.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

She's no queen. Jester maybe. Clown for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 29 points 6 months ago

I guess on balance it's more important to me that the Democrats reject Greene than reject Johnson. It's clear to everyone that Johnson is "weak" (in MAGA support) and dependent completely on Democrats to get anything done.

Now that that's out in the open and he's slightly a MAGA pariah, he'll probably get back to more old fashioned Republican projects like destroying the environment, fucking over workers, giving billions to billionaires, and a blank check to the military.

I mean ... Freedom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Just a reminder to Mikey that his fate is controlled by Democrats

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago

Haha, what a fucking loser.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 6 months ago

You have to be really careful with your eyebrows when you say “uniparty” in front of a camera

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

To her, bipartisan compromise is a dirty word. Uniparty is the new Antifa boogeyman.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Has anyone ever noticed that mtg looks like a wax life sized figure of a cave woman in the natural history display at the local museum?

Someone needs to give her a basket so she can gather some berries!

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I feel like these ad homien attacks are what allow people like Marjorie to thrive. If all you can do is put someone down for how they look then I really don't need to listen to what you have to say.

It's unfortunate because there are way worse things about Marjorie than her looks.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying ad hom is good, I'm saying she factually looks like a Neanderthal. If it's insulting to anyone, it's Neanderthals.

On the other hand, ridicule is the only way you can actually engage with someone like marge because you can't actually engage in good faith.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Just watched the new docu on Netflix about Neanderthals. Wow, you nailed it. She must have been frozen in a sheet of ice for a long time like Encino Man. Oh hell, now I've dated myself. For the young, it's a stupid movie from a long time ago. I think Sam (of Frodo fame) was in it. And another dude who you'd recognize. And a third dude who was popular for about ten seconds.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Stop weezin' the ju-uice, bu-uddy.

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

Hey, don't be rude. Cave women were far more civilized and intelligent. They don't deserve being compared to MTG!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

Cuntery Taitor Bullshit’s game is played out, and nobody will put up with her shit anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dreizehn@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

Who the hell do you support in this case? The right-wing religious nutter or the Russian FSB agent?

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

The right-wing religious nutter or the Russian FSB agent?

The right wing nutter. He did the bare minimum to enable support to Ukraine. That's more than the Russian FSB agent ever did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago

Is that gif supposed to be going mach 10, or is my client just freaking out?

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago

Maybe even the Republicants are accepting that Margarine Failure Gangrene is a full blown Russian shill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

She looks like that troglodyte they just recreated from that skull more and more every day…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — Hardline Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene stunned colleagues Wednesday calling for a vote to oust Speaker Mike Johnson, but lawmakers quickly rejected it.

One of Donald Trump’s biggest supporters in Congress, Greene stood on the House floor and read a long list of “transgressions” she said Johnson had committed as speaker.

It was the second time in a matter of months that Republicans have tried to oust their own speaker, an unheard-of level of party turmoil with a move rarely seen in U.S. history.

Johnson of Louisiana marched on, saying he had been willing to take the risk, believing it was important for the U.S. to back Ukraine against Russia’s invasion and explaining he wanted to be on the “right side of history.”

In a highly unusual move, the speaker received a boost from Democrats led by Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York, whose leadership team had said it was time to “turn the page” on the GOP turmoil and vote to table Greene’s resolution — almost ensuring Johnson’s job is saved, for now.

Trump also weighed in after Johnson trekked to Mar-a-Lago for a visit, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee giving the speaker his nod of approval.


The original article contains 441 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
353 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS