120
submitted 10 months ago by DaseinPickle@leminal.space to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 63 points 10 months ago

Yes there is FUD around signal. But they are not offering any better solutions.

Signal has some structural issues, and isn't a good solution for all threat models (i.e. if your a government who doesn't fully trust the USA, then signal isn't for you)

Any conversation that doesn't talk about briar, simplex, etc is deeply flawed since only they attempt to address the fundamental structural issues with signal.

Don't use that centralized chat service, use THIS centralized chat service - is just FUD... and isn't a helpful conversation.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Don't use a centralized chat service. Use a decentralized chat service. XMPP uses the same encryption for it's e2e encryption, is decentralized, and super light weight for both the server and the client.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 37 points 10 months ago

And "super easy" to use. To get your friend onto it, first you have to host a server, then they have to install a client with an interface from the 90s, activate the XEPs for encryption on their client and ensure the server supports it too, exchange usernames, create an encrypted connection and exchange random codes over another medium to ensure you're talking to the right person.

NOW you can start chatting with the other person and hope the server doesn't crash. ECPC

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

XMPP is nice, but OMEMO is brittle.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

Haven't ran into issues with it yet, and this is my preferred PM method. When does it break?

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

One account, multiple devices logging into it (in my use case, personal laptop, work laptop, two phones).

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Or, you can skip the unhinged rant, use monocles or dino, and a public server.

Also, hosting a server is much simpler than something like matrix. You can host an xmpp server on a pi and that is more than enough. Or, just use a public server.

So difficult.

I like how you included steps that absolutely aren't required and haven't been for like a decade to make your statement more hyperbolic.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

if your a government who doesn’t fully trust the USA, then signal isn’t for you

how? i tought it was e2ee and open source?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 10 months ago
[-] Forbo@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

The security of your key is determined by the strength of your passphrase. Am I missing something?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

https://hackertalks.com/comment/3441244

Uploading your private key to the cloud is a very risky thing to do regardless of your threat model. And there are many threat models that absolutely cannot do that. So it is worth indicating as one of the weaknesses of signal

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

the best answer

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

Telegram isnt really e2ee so he wants to champion the less secure option. Gee, I wonder why?????

[-] Rose@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Its Russian founder recently praised Musk in an interview for Tucker Carlson.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Is narcissistic disorder a prereq to be a billionaire or is it just a common symptom of having too much wealth for some.

[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah sort of. I think those types of disorders get rewarded in many cases. It's exceptionally profitable to exploit labor, mislead the public, and plunder the planet. When you have a conscience and empathy, that's a lot harder to do, especially if you already enjoy a certain level of financial security.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 42 points 10 months ago

telegram is the real FUD here. its closed, not encrypted by default and all messages go through a centralized server.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 37 points 10 months ago

I don't think it has anything to do with the "right wingers." I think many people and governments seek to discredit anything they can not control. Its basic misinformation tactics.

As far as Elon goes, he says crazy things and shouldn't be believed.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They do this periodically. We saw it during Occupy, the Arab Spring, BLM, now Palestine (again). As a general rule, when folks go into the streets, the tighty righties start up the FUD.

There is a reason why spooks learn tradecraft - threat modeling, procedures, awareness, and techniques - more than they learn technology. It would behoove folks to to learn a little about that before hitting up the appstore.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Talks about other people creating FUD, then links to a post asserting telegram is compromised without citing any sources about anything discussed in the post. 🙄 FUD indeed.

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 0 points 10 months ago

I'm not saying it's broken, but it has some design choices and functions that makes even Whatsapp a better choice for privacy minded people. Like rolling their own crypto and not having e2ee as default.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Anti-libre software, WhatsApp, bans us from proving it has E2EE, bans us from proving any of its claims and bans us from removing malicious source code.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Telegram is Service as a Software Substitute (proof app needs service and we are missing server software for it: broken app).

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

When do they not spread FUD?

[-] CatTrickery@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It think there are a lot of factors at play. Musk wants Twitter* to be an everything app and has mentioned plans to add e2e encryption to the dms. Telegram already had an iffy relationship to people who look for encrypted platforms so he probably wants to set up that idea to get people onto Twitter instead, especially as the right's relationship to the platform is absolutely getting worse.

A big chunk of far right Telegram has moved off the platform recently after quite a few of the groups that got their start from anti-lockdown demos had members get arrested for terror charges. They seem to blame the fact that Telegram is backdoored but they constantly fed-post in open unencrypted channels anyone can read anyway. The police probably do monitor those channels but if I were to guess how they got caught, my bet is honestly that they just put in reports to the cops about each other because being fascists usually goes hand in hand with being horrible people.

I'm not sure how much he actually reads on far right Telegram but there is evidence of him at least following some channels where this sentiment can be seen. If I were to guess he saw oppotunity in bringing that audience back to Twitter.

* I refuse to call it X

EDIT: fix early accidental submission

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Yes, "because one of their council is leftist pro censorship"

Like this crap

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Like this crap

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago
[-] The_Dark_Knight@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Idk how secure telegram is but cmon signal is shady AF . They won't let fdroid have it cause they want to sign their own keys or some shit but there is a speculation its because they can roll out custom apk to targets which governments want which is just not possible if it is hosted by someone like fdroid . Even telegram allows that and they even allow third party apps which signal won't .

SimpleX and briar is the best option if your actually worried about privacy .

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I do see it weird but publishing on F-Droid means almost nothing. If you are scared of their pre-built apks, compile from source instead. If Telegram and Signal are bad, use SimpleX.

[-] The_Dark_Knight@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

It means a ton to me and a lot others and no one has to compile from source every time .

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
120 points (84.5% liked)

Privacy

36501 readers
417 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS