55
submitted 6 months ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Good luck enforcing any "serious injury" caused by biking. Literally just a useless law that boils down to the government nagging you to drive a car.

Can't wait until these "small government" types want to force bicyclists to buy insurance.

[-] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

Oi m8, you got a permit for that bike?

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

The government said it had agreed to introduce new laws so those who kill or seriously injure people because of dangerous or careless cycling face the same penalties as drivers and motorcyclists.

I mean, it's hard to imagine it's a significant problem but if that's all they're doing then I mean that seems reasonable. They had to go back eight years to find someone killed by a cyclist, but I'm sure injuries happen fairly regularly.

I'm a cyclist, I regularly see fellow cyclists doing things that make pedestrians unsafe and that's bad. If the law is as incoherent wrt cyclists as the article claims I don't think passing a law like this is bad, even though there are some loonies they quote who are out to lunch.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

I mean, it's hard to imagine it's a significant problem but if that's all they're doing then I mean that seems reasonable.

On the surface, yes, and I'm not against punishment for people who ride their bikes like dicks, however I'd argue it's really not the same because most of the world is designed for cars first and foremost, for bicycles, not so much, and that makes the equivalency kind of hard to argue. Like how much do you, as a cyclist, have to expect someone to play crossing the street entirely be ear and step into your path, especially on things like MUPs or all the garbage infrastructure provided for cycling?

Kim’s husband, who has campaigned for a change in the law and accused the government of fearing a “militant cycling lobby”.

Like my honest condolences some fixie moron killed your wife because he figured he's too cool for brakes, and hell you can think this, but the state should not listen to this, because it's basically a conspiracy theory

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

Unless you spend $1000+ on your bike.

This is a tax on anyone making less than 30k a year

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

What do you have to do to your bike?

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

Not too terrible?

UK has been changing laws in the past few years so that bikes must be fully considered legitimate traffic by other drivers. It makes sense to increase the expectations on cyclists to actually act and have the same responsibilities as traffic too, rather than a weird hybrid. All of this is in lieu of just creating decent cycle infrastructure, which the UK is no longer capable of doing since it's a developing nation larping as an imperial power.

[-] save_vs_death@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

you call it "offence" i call it "achievement"

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

former Conservative leader, Iain Duncan Smith

Okay, in fairness, I think every Tory has been party leader for a bit in the last few years.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

says Iain Duncan Smith, who brought the amendment to the criminal justice bill

t. Guy who is mad a cyclist ran over his toe a decade ago sicko-biker

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

news

23569 readers
626 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS