240
Why Americans' confidence in finding a new job is tanking even as the labor market is humming along (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 6 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 98 points 6 months ago

I had to quit my job last year both for health reasons and because we decided to put our daughter in online school.

I was a video editor before all of this. I was already unable to find a job in my field for a few years because everyone marketing person's boss told them to download a free editing app and just shoot it all on their iPhone. Doesn't matter if it sucks, it's cheaper. And by the time I'm back on the job market, they'll use AI to do it. And it will still suck compared to what I can do, but they won't care because it's cheaper.

I'm turning 48 next month. I feel like I'm basically doomed to work shit jobs that I hate until I die.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 19 points 6 months ago

AI was a mistake.

Best wishes.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 33 points 6 months ago

capitalism was. tech is just tech.

AI can be used to speed us up, so instead of having free time we get 1 person shoddily doing the work of a few.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 6 months ago

I tend to believe the progression of technology hasn’t been a good thing for your typical worker. With AI in particular, having workers at all seems to be at odds with the progression of technology at some point. Capitalism isn’t sustainable.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

More than just a mistake. It's the mistake that will keep on mistaking.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I feel we've been through this several times already...

Jobs become obsolete. It sucks. But that's the reality. AI is not a mistake, but it will kill a lot of livelihoods we care about in the creative scene. But just like coal mining, life will move on.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

Yeah, so were cameras.

Adapt or die. Welcome to the human condition.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 6 months ago

It’s exactly the same thing in the sense that a slingshot and nuclear bomb are the same thing. That is to say, the degree is so extreme that they might as well be unrelated.

I haven’t heard anyone propose that digital cameras are an existential threat to humans. This is no mere horse and buggy problem. If we develop generally intelligent AI it’s game over for our capitalist global economy.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's the thing about all these articles on how well the job market is doing, while simultaneously there are tons of articles on layoffs and bankruptcies that they never acknowledge that all - the new jobs always feel like they are in gig and crap work.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

It's part of a concerted effort by the upper echelons of Capital to break the middle class - they own the media and use it to strategically time news to either move the market, influence legislation and policy, all while keeping people disillusioned and fearful.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

I can't say I had any luck on there but someone with your skills may do well on Freelancer if you've got a portfolio of your work.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I did contract work back when I was in L.A. and I can't go back to that sort of financial uncertainty at this point. It also takes so much more effort just to keep getting paid. You have to spend all your time not working hustling for work.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago

The "labor market" is great for jobs paying <$15/hr. Go to your local gas station, dollar store, or restaurant and you'll probably see a help wanted sign.

Over that and youre kinda fucked unless you have a niche role to fill.

[-] shikitohno@lemm.ee 60 points 6 months ago

Yeah, talking about jobs being created without any context on the types of jobs being created is meaningless. Great, there are now more part-time jobs paying minimum wage with no benefits and erratic schedules near me, just the sort of job creation I was waiting for so I could regress in my career.

[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I have no earthly clue what world economists are living in where the labor market is great.

I've been looking for a job for over a year (in tech, over a dozen years as an SDE, a dozen more as a TPM, lead role in both titles). Whenever I can get an employer to actually respond to the hundreds of applications I send, their salary offerings are a joke.

Are people just out there taking 20% - 30% haircuts on what they make?

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 45 points 6 months ago

They're measuring job offerings against unemployment claims rate. If there's toilet scrubbing jobs out there and you don't qualify for any benefits: that's a humming labor market to an economist.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I remind people that the fastest way to "create a job" is to take a full time position with benefits, cut the hours in half and divide them amongst two new positions after removing the benefits and now you have a 100% increase in the supply of jobs.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

My first 'legal' job when I was a minor was working maintenance at a retirement facility. I was hired along with another high schooler at minimum wage.

It was a summer gig and right before I quit to go back to school the main maintenance guy revealed that we had replaced a single person who was paid our combined wage.

It is a long established strategy.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Haleon/GSK has almost exclusively started offering only coops/internships in upstate NY. Not a single non hourly/salaried position in the last 6 months. Laid off 40-50 in the last year, brought on a dozen students.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

What does that mean? You can still claim unemployment if you don't apply to toilet scrubbing jobs

[-] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I feel you. I lost my job in January and I've had literally not even a single callback or interview. It's insane.

[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

That sucks too -- but do stick with it, find a good consultant who can help you polish up your resume and socials. You and me both will find something soon enough. :)

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Don't lose hope, it's a matter of numbers. Keep pushing. I've recently been through it and it's been very hard

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

What industry? I'm more of less in the same boat as you. I'm in tech, and this articles assessment seems pretty spot on from my perspective.

[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 6 months ago

Yeah, tech. Updated my original comment to clarify.

Honestly, the bit from the article that rang most accurate was this:

Lastly, it's possible that many Americans think the Bureau of Labor Statistics's job opening figures are overstated. For example, some job seekers have reported encountering "ghost jobs" — listings on job platforms that companies are no longer actively hiring for.

I've been keeping track of the roles I've gone after (well within qualification for) and I'm seeing a lot of re-listings for roles that closed out my application (with no outreach) and just relisted the req after a few weeks, over and over again.

I'm not saying the listings are fake, but if they were fake, this is pretty much what it would look like from the outside.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm seeing exactly the same thing. Certain companies re-listing the same position for months on end, despite hundreds of people applying.

According to this article I read recently, some companies are either doing it to give the illusion that they're thriving and planning to take on more staff, or just to keep a pool of potential applicants on the back burner just in case.

It sucks. I've been looking to make a career change for over a year, and have only had two interviews despite sending out literally hundreds of applications.

[-] TotalFat@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

They're just gaming the system for more H1B's.

[-] degen@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

Been in the same situation, with closer to mid-level experience. A plethora of companies, constantly hiring for the same positions while rejecting hundreds of applicants, week after week. Makes total sense. I can only hope there's something illegal about it.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

I have no earthly clue what world economists are living in where the labor market is great.

100% of employed economists writing these reports are employed, so from their perspective everything is great.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Once again, we see how insular tech is.

Tech sector has a market correction, and you people think the sky is falling because the only people you ever talk to are other tech people.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 49 points 6 months ago

Oh look, another article where privileged folks point at lines on a chart and tell us we're wrong for acknowledging that our lived experiences and those of our friends suck in recent years.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago

We don't want your shit smear jobs that pay nothing and have ass schedules

[-] umulu@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Exactly! And why the fuck the majority of employers say they can't afford to pay more?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Because they want to take home more, basic greed.

[-] umulu@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's a shame... We could be so much more than zeros on a bank account.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 33 points 6 months ago

Mass layoffs and closures of locations constantly in the news and the market is "humming along?"

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

"Labor market humming along" = Politician-speak for "as many or more part time low wage jobs with no benefits added than good jobs lost"

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

because they have to go through all the bullshit HR people come up with?

  • tell us why we should hire you
  • that is literally your job dummy
[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

For those interested in discussing their job searches, did you know there's a !jobs@lemmy.world community? Not terribly active at the moment, but given the discussion here there seems to be some potential interest

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah it all looks good when youre part of it. Standing on the outside looking in though is a souring perspective. Thing is, nobody wants to hear how hard the hard-hit have it

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
240 points (95.5% liked)

News

23311 readers
2019 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world