337
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 163 points 6 months ago

He profited from the secret service (and by proxy, us) the whole time he was president when he made them pay full price to have rooms at his garbage resort in Florida.

This should not be a surprise.

[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 113 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He profited from the secret service (and by proxy, us) the whole time he was president when he made them pay full price to have rooms at his garbage resort in Florida.

I don't think this is true. I thought he increased the standard rate and charged them that. So it was like, double price.

Quick edit: I just looked it up, it was allegedly 4-5 times the approved government hotel rate.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-organization-charged-secret-service-much-1185-night-stay-trump-d-rcna52521

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

He raised prices ahead of stays so it was full-full price.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 24 points 6 months ago
[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I mean we knew this at the time and there was reporting on the immoluments clause back then. The result was... crickets.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why should this not be a surprise?

Why do so many people normalize corruption?

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago

Let’s turn questions into convictions.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

Let’s just not vote for Trump. We went through this already and we already know he will profit from the Presidency in any way he can. This article is the same one I read 6 years ago. It’s insane that people have forgotten all of this already.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 27 points 6 months ago

Good luck trying to get conservatives to not vote for a fascist dictator wannabe

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Young Democrats are mostly progressives and don’t like it when you call them liberals. But yes, their votes for Biden are what will keep Trump out of office.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

don’t like it when you call them liberals

They don't? That's weird, I've never heard of that

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There are many progressives on Lemmy that love to identify wedge issues for no reason other than to designate the difference between progressives and liberals. I’m all about being on one team against the right, but I was trying to be respectful of those who don’t want to be mislabeled.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Progressive and liberal are two very different things. Fox News and the US political discourse/Overton Window has classified anything left of the GOP as "liberal," but in reality it means "center right."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I have come to the conclusion over the last few months based on things people have said they expect Biden to do that they aren't worried about a presidential candidate who says he will be a dictator because they think that presidents are already dictators.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

they do not represent any sort of majority and wouldn't be the swing in any vote.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -5 points 6 months ago

Those aren’t liberals. They’re the far left. And most of them would be just fine to suffer under Trump instead of doing the actual work to it takes to change the system in the four years they have between the presidential elections.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That sure is a fine straw man you built yourself there, mighty fine.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -3 points 6 months ago

You probably want to learn what a straw man is before you use it in a sentence.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's when a person sets up and then attacks a position that is not actually being debated. Which is exactly what you did. Your lacking the ability to see it isn't a me problem, it's a you problem.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’m perfectly within the wheelhouse of the discussion. So there’s no setting up of a position that isn’t being debated. Liberals and the definition of- is the subject. I simply corrected something that in my opinion, was incorrect.

That you dislike my opinion in the matter, doesn’t mean you get to accuse me of things I’m not doing. Especially when you come back with a definition that doesn’t fit my actions even remotely.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Didn't he do this while he was president, forcing them to stay at his hotels and paying out of their budget or something?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Yes. And he overcharged them

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

And the consequence is?

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 20 points 6 months ago

He gets them to run in giant hamster wheels, generating electricity to sell back to the grid.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

No questions. We’ve already done thi- YOU’VE already done this, rawstory.

Fucking clickbait editor garbage headline

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 21 points 6 months ago

It's happening again, so it's newsworthy. We can't just stop reporting on corruption because it's been done before.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Right? Like, if I kill a bunch of people, is the media supposed to stop after the first murder?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

If it did not matter to prosecutors during the for years he did it while president, why the fuck would any of them care now?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Are the questions raised in the sense of people who intone every sentence as if it were a question?

"So here's the story? Trump profited off his Secret Service detail? I have the evidence?"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

.... he's been doing it since he first had a secret service detail....

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Insane to me that we’ve known about this for years and nobody has done anything about it. He literally just charged them extra for hotel rooms to pad his wallet

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Grifters gonna grift, they can't help themselves.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

the answer will be "yes, and?"

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

He really shouldnt even have the service while hes running for the office again. No other candidates have them. Would keep him on an equal footing. No former president should have that detail after a couple years anyway. Just costs us money better spent of better stuff

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Former presidents almost always have protection. Major candidates often get it.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
337 points (97.5% liked)

News

23424 readers
1530 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS