136
submitted 3 months ago by ConsciousBowl@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Users will be required to submit documentation proving they are legally single and sign a letter stating they are willing to get married.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Everything but things that will actually work, i.e. changing the work culture so people have time to have sex and aren't so stressed that they don't want to.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 48 points 3 months ago

And force companies to pay better salaries. The pay in Japan is fucking bananas bad.

[-] Shou@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

And money. Money and time to take care of children.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The good news is there are already a lot of subsidy programs for people marrying and starting families, and those programs are expanding to include more people and offer more money.

It's not as good as it should be, but it's better than it was a few years ago.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

And also the completely fucked state of the world

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And that fundamentally many women don't want to have children, which plays out in every society where women have some level of rights. In addition, wealthier and more developed nations in general tend to have lower birth rates.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 49 points 3 months ago

Does anyone in Japan have the time and money to have kids?

[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I assume the old guys in government have alot of free time to do nothing useful otherwise... One step closer to the crazy train of some h-manga tropes of restarting population growth...

[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They're gonna start forcefully milking men! Like in communist China!!! (NSFW)

[-] bluGill@kbin.run 3 points 3 months ago

Some do, the birth rate isn't zero. However for whatever reason (time is often cited) many never do.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 46 points 3 months ago

Nothing sparks romance like legal documentation and state sponsored matchmaking

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

Have they thought of letting more foreigners in?

Nah...

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Racism is still strong in Japan. Foreigner in Japan have a hard time to date people. So I don't think it would matter.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I know about the racism, that was sort of what I was implying.

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oh sorry misread.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Japan will unironically ask "why, we are full of house keepers?"

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago

They are actually relaxing the rules now. A lot of white YouTubers have moved to Japan recently because of it.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

TBH, I like this idea. A problem with Tinder, et al. is that they don't give a shit about you matching, they want to make money off you. So they're invested in keeping you on their app as long as possible. An app that has no profit motive because it's fully funded already eliminates that entirely.

Will it work? Maybe, for the people that want to meet someone and start a family, and are currently having a hard time meeting other similarly minded people. Will it be a major shift in culture? Probably not.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I completely agree. It’s why I’ve never been on the apps, how could I possibly trust them when they clearly don’t want to succeed at their function? It’s also probably why I’ve been single for years…

A fully non-profit transparently administered dating app is a great idea, and I would sign up immediately.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Honestly, I think that you could probably even make something work if you had a one-time-only up-front fee, no advertising, and identification verification combined with criminal background checks (e.g., you couldn't use it to cheat on your existing spouse, and all the people are real people). Heck, you could even set it so that if someone tried using it for advertising (OnlyFans or similar), you could permanently boot them off, since they'd need to prove identity to sign up in the first place.

Data security though... That would be a bigger problem. You def. would not want to have any kind of data breach once you had that kind of PII in your database.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah state sponsored dating makes me horny. This is willy surely be a great success.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago

They also need to report income which makes this again a non-starter as people in Japan are fed the fuck up with the class bullshit.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

At least the government already has most of that info as compared to a random 3rd party that wants to harvest and sell your data to make a profit (trying to find some silver lining)

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Headlines: "Dating apps are a privacy nightmare."

Also headlines: "Government to launch dating app."

Hmmmmm

[-] HandsomePotatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Riri time has come

[-] Ritsu4Life@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Major "Koi to Uso (Love and Lies)" vibes.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

"Use this app and all your child's expenses will be covered until they graduate from college."

Problem solved.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

Might work if there were more than like 4 women in all of Japan

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There are women everywhere, what are you talking about. Last i recall, before i look at stats, women outnumber the men in Japan

Roughly 4 million more women

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
136 points (96.6% liked)

News

22890 readers
3611 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS