563
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 167 points 2 years ago

Also Clarence Thomas: "Ha ha, fuck all of you, I'm admitting it because there's fuck all you can do about it."

The American mullahs can do whatever they like.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

He learned from the Trump felony conviction apparently. Trumps conviction was on the coverup, not the payments.

Thomas is getting out in front of this by removing the "cover up" part.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Would it matter? He's the "shoot a guy on fifth avenue" person. Who's going to be able to prosecute a SCOTUS justice who can appeal to SCOTUS and not recuse himself?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Really dont need to prosecute first, gotta get him off the bench as step one. Dems could try to impeach, but as we see nothing gets done in the Senate either. Well shit...

Maybe one of those fine 2nd ammendment people....

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 12 points 2 years ago

There's that boxes of liberty saying. Soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. Use in that order. It's one of those sayings that's popular among diverse people I think.

[-] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

He must be feeling the heat if he voluntarily disclosed this backdated graft.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Doubtful. He has done nothing to show any remorse for what he is doing to us all.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This was a standard disclosure. Feeling 'the heat' has nothing to do with it. Jackson got 1.2k in flowers from Opera. Appointed officials shouldn't be able to accept any form of donations above a very minor amount like $20.

https://youtu.be/R4bw88-tzSg

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 115 points 2 years ago

The report Friday comes after a separate report this week found Supreme Court Justices have received about $4.7 million in gifts over the past two decades — more than $4 million of which was pocketed by Thomas alone, newly revealed data showed.

Jesus Christ, Thomas.

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

And that’s just what was disclosed. Remember him and Alito were claiming stuff was “personal hospitality” and didn’t need reported.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 years ago

The word is "bribes."

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

John Oliver did a great piece on the compromised ethics of SCOTUS with special attention to Thomas.

https://youtu.be/GE-VJrdHMug

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 22 points 2 years ago

We all really wish he would have accepted the motorcoach offer. John Oliver is a treasure, putting his money where his mouth is trying to save our country from scum like Thomas.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

No joke. He put his own option for retirement on the table to help America. That’s a tremendously selfless offer.

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

It was somehow always obvious, that he's the one getting the biggest piece of cake.

With every breath he takes, he exhales that "i am king, i am god" flair.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Uncle Tom's ~~cabin~~ yaught trip to Bali.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 76 points 2 years ago

And once again, there will be no penalty.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

There absolutely should be a penalty, fucking ridiculous that we have a system that defers serious legal shit to 7 individuals who aren't even elected. 3 of which were appointed by an orange reality TV star.

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

This is America. If we punished bald-faced corruption, what else might we have to punish? Insider trading? Police violence? Violations of people's civil and human rights? It's a slippery slope, friend!

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If we punished for corruption, we'd have very few politicians and like probably zero corporate executives. Probably few cops too.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

This sounds great! Where do I sign up?

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago

You can bet your ass there would be huge penalties if this guy was a Democrat.

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

If he were a Democrat his own party would be falling all over themselves to denounce him; but because he's a Republican it's just par for the course.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

He knows nobody will touch him so he brags now

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 years ago

When the Supreme Court loses all legitimacy, like it has, things get shittier much, much quicker.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 years ago

Bali is so hot, is he just warming up for the afterlife? I promise you will be in pornos there, Thomas, but not the kind you think.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Abort the court

[-] mrgreyeyes@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

The picture is so fitting for this situation.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 years ago

About 2 months ago I saw a news clip where he announced his resignation. There was a voice recording of him, he didn't say the word "resign" but implied it

Did I jump timelines?

[-] mos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I believe he talked about resigning in 2000 to some republican at a conference. Caught my eye when I read that and was sad to see the date.

[-] beetlejuice0001@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

The populace should be angry. Everyone should riot. This blatant corruption and should be on every news station non stop

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
563 points (99.1% liked)

News

36529 readers
375 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS