95
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 86 points 5 months ago

She frequently demonstrates exactly why she didn't get elected.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 months ago

2016 was awful...it was like choosing between breaking some ribs or a breaking a femur. It was going to suck no matter what. Turns out the femur break was a compound fracture that had gangrene set in.

In retrospect do I wish she had won? Yes. Definitely. On the other hand, that might have meant a 2020 Trump victory.

Unless she really embraced the progressive wing of the party and really moved the country forward in terms of resolving home ownership, income stagnation, or health care in an impactful way, I can't imagine her getting a second term.

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I voted for her, but i seriously held my nose while doing it. I volunteered for Obama, but i didn't for Hilary. I was demotivated by the polls saying she was a sure thing, and by me seriously not liking her as a person and many of her political positions. She was obviously way better than Trump, but man was she a crappy candidate.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

What political positions didn't you like when she was running?

[-] Elegen@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I'm not OP, but for me, it was her verse Bernie. She felt like voting for the status quo and would likely not bring about any big changes. She might have beought about some good chnages but to me, I got the vibe she just wanted her moment and the title of first female president. Maybe I'm wrong but she just felt like the corporate choice. On the other hand there was Bernie. Yes, another old white guy, but this one actually felt genuine and made me feel like he could actually change things (though the house and senate might have something to say about that). Plus just look at his history. Dude was a stand up guy and never changed. That all being said, I still voted Hilary when Bernie lost to her because I knew trump was going to be horrible for this country.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I also voted for Bernie and then for Hillary. But I think Hillary did just have bad feels built against her for 30 years.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

felt like

vibe

felt

This is how you know you've fallen for propaganda. Almost every single time I ask about Hillary's policy positions, the people who hate Hillary either spout some right wing conspiracy bs or they just talk about "vibes".

(There's the occasional leftist who actually knows what her policy positions are but 95% of the times it's bs or vibes)

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Almost every single time I ask about Hillary’s policy positions, the people who hate Hillary either spout some right wing conspiracy bs or they just talk about “vibes”.

They did exactly what Putin & the GOP hoped they would do. Think about "vibes" instead of the 5 different ways she was going to raise taxes on the wealthy.

[-] Elegen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Where in my post did I say I hate Hilary? I said it was her vs Bernie for me and I preferred Bernie. Nowhere did I say I hated her. I remember looking at what they stood for and their history, and I preferred Bernie. I'm not going to comment on specific policy positions from 8 years ago. I dont remember that shit. Maybe you can in which case I'm jealous of your memory. But I do remember general feelings which is why I said what I did.

You are prolly right about if someone bases their opinion alone on feelings, then it's likely heavily influenced by propaganda. But I did mention Bernies history and what he stood for. I didn't specifically mention Hilarys though. But I did look at that stuff at the time. I just remember feelings better than specifics.

That being said, you also can't judge someone alone based on their policies. They are politicians. There's a decent chance they will lie and say what they think people want to hear with no intent to follow through. So you have to also look at their history. And I also like to look at how they speak. Do they feel genuine? Of course they could be amazing liars. But I think feelings/gut instinct do have a role to play. It's just not as important as their history and policies. And for me, Bernie checked all 3 of those boxes better than Hilary did.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's fair, it was 8 years ago. But 8 years ago, few people cared about her policies either.

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is almost exactly my opinion

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't remember at this point, it was ~~4~~ 8 years ago

[-] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

8 years ago dude

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Same as the other guy I volunteered for Obama and in 2016 I voted for her but I don’t/didn’t think she should be president. To me she was disqualified because she was the spouse of a former president. Same as I don’t want Michelle Obama to be president. I don’t care how qualified or if she would have brought about a utopian future. I don’t want families running the country.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Of all the reasons to not want Hillary to be president, this has got to be one of the most absurd takes I've encountered.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Why? We’re not a dynasty. We can find people just as qualified outside familial ties.

Your willingness to just accept passing power family members is more absurd to me.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I complained for Bernie and was big mad about the contested convention and how it’s screwed him. If we got Bernie we would not be in this situation

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

If Bernie had gotten the nomination I would have probably gotten involved, even though I'm in Utah and they'd vote for Hitler if he was Republican. Especially if Jesus ran as a Democrat.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I voted for Bernie also but there was no contested convention. Bernie was not contesting anything because he wasn't a shit politician like Treason Trump. If you were "big mad" it is because that's what Putin and the GOP wanted so that the end result was Convicted Felon and Sex Offender Treason Trump giving a gigantic tax cut to the billionaire establishment elites.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

seems her understanding can be bought with 2.6 million US dollars.

she should probably go gaslight somebody else. We're tired of boomers gaslighting us. "Whah you don't understand!!!"

no. we do.

[-] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

The amount this woman fails to grasp, morally or otherwise, is truly astounding. I still blame her for Trump's win, and wished they'd both just fuck off already.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

Yeah, we don't need the take of the one who elevated Trump in the primaries and then sucked enough in the general to let him within cheating distance of the white house.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

"They don’t know very much at all about the history of the Middle East"

You're right, it's actually WORSE than what they understand.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 months ago

Go away Hillary.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 22 points 5 months ago

Pokemon Go commit genocide

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Fucking stop posting her.

[-] meleecrits@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Does anyone else feel like she's ramping up her media attention for a 2028 presidential run?

It just seems odd since she went silent after 2016 and now it seems like she's trying to get in the headlines again.

God I hope she doesn't run.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

I mean the reason she lost last time is apparently because she wasn't 80 yet.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Either that or she thinks she can be a Broadway producer

Clinton was on the US network to promote a new musical she has produced, Suffs, about American suffragists and their fight for voting rights.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Chelsea 2028

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

"We must allow children to be massacred with our money because of ✨HISTORY✨"

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

It really is astonishing how bad her political instincts are. A large majority of her party disapproves of what Israel is doing to Gaza, but she chooses now to call the protesters ignorant? A group of young progressives Biden will probably need in order to win? Who is this for?

Honestly, I'm not even mad about the stupid shit she says anymore, I'm fascinated. Does she know she's politically irrelevant going forward, so she's just on some sort of bitter, scorched-Earth tirade? Is the party encouraging her to say crap like this as some sort of testing ground for unpopular messaging? Or does she really just this detached from public opinion?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If she didn't decide to dedicate her life to shitting on progressives then Bernie probably would be finishing up his second term and the country would be 19% less stupid

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Democrats trying to pull a Clinton2.0

Watch them blame leftists again when they lose and proceed to shift the entire party even more right. Because if more people voted Republican that must mean people wanted the Democrats to be more right wing!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's perhaps the funniest headline of the month.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
95 points (76.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
2084 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS