815
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Fix the Court, the group that released the findings, calculated the total in gifts from January 2004 to December 2023 and said the nine current justices received 344 gifts totaling nearly $3million.

Supreme Court justices received $3million in gifts throughout the last two decades, a watchdog group revealed on Thursday - with controversial Justice Clarence Thomas accounting for nearly 80 percent. 

Thomas, who has come under fire for accepting gifts from billionaire Harlan Crow, led the group of justices with the highest value of gifts accepted at $2.4million, according to Court News Service.

Fix the Court, the group that released the findings, calculated the total in gifts from January 2004 to December 2023 and said the nine current justices received 344 gifts totaling nearly $3million.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] credo@lemmy.world 92 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

$120K/yr in gifts seems perfectly reasonable. I just haven’t pulled on my bootstraps hard enough to find such nice friends.

Maybe next year!

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

If all someone’s decisions are obviously best for the least amongst us, I might be okay with whatever (disclosed!) gifts

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] card797@champserver.net 89 points 5 months ago

Is there no consequence for this? Wtf are we just letting this slide for? America is so fucked.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 66 points 5 months ago

This is how it always been, internet made it impossible to hide.

The people in power don't even really care, what about overworked and underpaid wage slaves going to do about it?

Make a shit post, maybe do a protest then lay down and take it anyway?

Asking for a friend.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago

The ruling class of the United States has always been like this. This is a country founded by and for slaveowners that gladly governed in their own favor.

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Who’s gonna prosecute him? He’s can appeal up to the highest court and then exonerate himself together with his buddies.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

If the system was working as it should congress can impeach him. But that's not going to happen we know that he knows that.

I also think that he is using this GOP congressional firewall to keep doing it because why not?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

And I'm glad I don't live there

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Much like the Mullahs of Iran, the Mullahs of America can do whatever they want and you have to do what they say.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

funny how America mocks Iran's undemocratic clown house but we have too worship this shit at home...

the sad part is that the NPC culture accepted it, everyone is for it as along as it is "their" team who gets to make shots

we got what we deserves really at this point. sucks to suck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qooqie@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

That is not that much money to sell out the American people

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 31 points 5 months ago

Those are just the "gifts" we know about. There have probably been dozens of envelopes full of cash or gold coins as well.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

so why can't anybody do anything? why does he still get to wear the robe and have such a say in the world? maybe the good guys should start breaking rules as well to get things done since the right has already established that precedent. they're not gonna just start playing nice because the democrats are.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 31 points 5 months ago

This is how the American system works. He's just not being classy about it.

Congressmembers do insider trading all the time and move into industry positions after they leave, having helped those exact industries (following the requests of their lobbyists). Congressmembers go straight to the top of boards for weapons manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, etc.

Regulators and other officials do the same thing. They cycle back and forth between the industries they're supposed to reign in and supposedly the job where they do reign them in. Work for the FCC -> work for a telecom -> FCC -> telecom.

In terms of the Supreme Court itself, it is an illegitimate body that has legitimacy only because the other two branches give it to them. Their major powers are not in the constitution and they have very few rules to follow.

You are right that gaining power to establish justice is what really matters, not "the rules" (which are always selectively applied). But it really depends on what you mean by the "good guys". If you mean Democrats, unfortunately they are also deeply embedded in this system and are not champions against it. They maintain power through the same kinds of industry connections and exit strategies and insider training. Their electoral apparatus is built on getting donations from companies and their executives so that they can buy ads and canvassers and phone bankers and data nerds to reach out and drive likely voters to turn out for them.

I've been in high-ish level Dem offices on various occasions. They put a lot of effort into shmoozing with donors and doing everything they can to get more money from likely donors. Big and small, though big get the most attention. The idea of building their base of power from the action of motivated grassroots individuals is rejected. And that's the only real base of power that is likely to reflect justice.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

the good guys should start breaking rules

The rich right supports people like their Proud Boys, Three Percenters and the Oath Keepers to keep people in line but not so much on the left and they are dealt with much more harshly by law enforcement for the similar crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Because all US politicians do this. Including all the ones on the Supreme Court. The entire system is corrupt. That’s why Roberts wont go before anyone and discuss it or why no one is really pushing too hard to do anything to him about it. They all do the same thing in one form or the other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 5 months ago

I'm mostly just annoyed that democracy was sold that cheaply.

[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Every single time dude. Every time I see what a politician was paid to worsen their constituents' lives, the dollar amount tied to it is just never that remarkable, especially in the context of a world where Elon Musk gets a $56bn pay package for nothing in return.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IamRoot@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 months ago

Everyone must know that we are only seeing the tiniest tip of the actual iceberg.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

For sure, or he would have taken up John Oliver on his offer.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

lol that isn’t shit. The corporations buy and sell this guy like a slave. 2.4M are pennies to these people. That money is nothing to them. Fuck you Clarence Thomas.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 5 months ago

Obvious corruption.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 months ago

Straight to jail for corruption

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago

Wait so all the justices recieved $3M in gifts, and $2.4M of that was to Thomas? That's like 80% of the gifts.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

That he's reported. Who knows what else isn't on the radar yet, because that corrupt fucker keeps "misremembering" to report gifts like private school tuition, RV loans that get forgiven, and several vacations a year.

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Maybe a better approach would be to distribute the gifts equally amongst the justices. That way they could all graft equally. Equal graft under the law!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

appointing like 90 more supreme court justices would make this cost prohibitive

[-] Chewget@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Gotta make it an even 100. Two for each state o_0

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 15 points 5 months ago

You're misspelled BRIBE.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

All that GOP complaining about activist judges was just another example that every accusation is an admission. They were stacking all the courts with activist judges so they could throw out elections and install a christofascist dictatorship. Trump's reelection is the final step. They kill him off once he's elected along with whatever simpleton sycophant he chooses as his running mate and install the christofascist speaker of the house at president. They telegraphed that when they claimed that the Democrats were going to kill of Biden to install Harris as president. Every single accusation is an admission.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

There is no point in following the rules when the people in power clearly don't.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Sure there is. Unlike them, if you break the rules you go to jail.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

There's a big point. A gun point.

The difference between you and Clarence Thomas is simply what each of you can get away with. Cops won't come knocking on Thomas's door for this. In fact, they'll guard his door.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

So? It's not like the people who showered Him in gifts have cases in front of the Court!

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Wait a second, my friends have never given me anything close to a million dollar gift. What assholes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Not just so far. That we know of so far.

I'd be amazed if the real number wasn't many times this.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 11 points 5 months ago

I wish we had public servants who did their fucking job for their base pay, just like the rest of us do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

Wish I could get two mill to fuck over my employer

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Tip of the iceberg.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

That's only the starterpack compared to high profile politicians and CEOs.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Nothing wrong with working for the highest pay - just let your employer know who you are really working for.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

This guy doesn't say a word for decades. Now he can't stop being an ass.

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

He didn't even have to hide gold bars in his underwear like Menendez.

[-] mdurell@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Fix the court? The court is fixed!

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Uncle Tom's Courtroom.

[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Annnnnnd the party of law and order will want to do something about this right? RiiiiIiightt?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
815 points (98.9% liked)

News

23376 readers
3341 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS