187
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tuckerm@supermeter.social 65 points 3 months ago

This may not work out the way I want it to, but I'm actually a little excited about these tech companies making a bunch of anti-consumer decisions all at once. So many mainstream users will be looking for alternatives, and it's going to provide a great opportunity for non-profit open source projects. It's already happening with the fediverse suddenly becoming a viable place for discussion in the last 1.5 years. After Windows Recall was announced, I've seen more people talking about switching to Linux than ever before. Part of me can't wait for unskippable Youtube ads.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 44 points 3 months ago

People often decry accelerationism, but the reality is that the slow-boiled frog is the one that sits and dies. Chipping away at freedoms, consumer protections, product benefits, etc is all less likely to spark backlash than when they drop sharply in a short time.

That doesn't mean you should help to make things worse, but it does mean that you may want to reconsider constantly mitigating every bad thing that others are doing, rather than letting them shoot themselves in the foot. When people are being hurt, help them. When people are being inconvenienced, let them get angry.

[-] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 9 points 3 months ago

This looks like a very classical and well-known case of executives copying each other.

That other company is doing layoffs and seems fine? Reports the line going up? Let's do it, too!

The guys across the street are already implementing AI? Investors love it? Let do it, too! We may have taken a risk with blockchain, but this one is just sure to work better for us!

The big name is going for the money, predator-style, and they're still afloat? Finally, we can cash out, too!

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We need Cory to coin a term for what comes after enshittification. Perhaps we can call it the Great Wipening, where we all stop paying to be treated like serfs and start taking back control of our content and data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] null@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

After Windows Recall was announced, I've seen more people talking about switching to Linux than ever before.

I've been the Linux zealot in my friend group for years, and none of them have switched (they've dabbled on old laptops but never daily drove).

With Recall, a coworker I never would have expected reached out to me because he knows I'm a "Linux guy" and he was switching to Linux over it.

He's still daily driving pop_OS a month later.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feyter@programming.dev 46 points 3 months ago

Of course they do. They want to keep control over monetization. They don't care about creators at all.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 43 points 3 months ago

TL;DW: the ads will be in the video stream itself which will mess up timestamps, sponsor block uses timestamps to know when the ads are.

Seems to me that this will also break every other use case of specific times like direct linking to a timestamp of a video, right?

[-] Alice@beehaw.org 30 points 3 months ago

This sucks for so many. People use timestamps for content warnings or to help viewers avoid spoilers. Commenters use timestamps when talking about the content of the video. It's insane to change this once it's so ingrained in how people use the website.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 months ago

It's also how content creators literally create chapters: put the time codes into the video description

That's a native feature of the platform

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] smeg@feddit.uk 13 points 3 months ago

Hopefully they'll realise it's a bigger breaking change than they wanted as part of this testing phase

[-] jherazob@beehaw.org 14 points 3 months ago

You assume they give a fuck

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago

Yeah I do. They still want to be able to sell their premium subscriptions and not every engineer working on the product is some soulless corpo. If they can break all adblockers without damaging their product they will, but if it fucks things up too much then they'll go back to the drawing board and try something else.

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago

I'd imagine YouTube subtracts the ad length from posted timestamps when clicking a link containing one. But we are taking about Google, soooooo...

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 14 points 3 months ago

If Google can do that then hopefully sponsor block can too!

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

In the cat and mouse game, the cat can adjust tactics but the mice eventually figure out an alternative route. I'm sure they will find a way with this. Either that or a lot of people will just stop watching YouTube, I'd imagine.

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

A truly shocking number of people don't use any form of adblock. I doubt that driving off the adblock users will have a significant effect on viewership (and even if it does, why would Google care, it's not like we're making them money).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@beehaw.org 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It will end up being like FreeVee on Prime for anyone who's ever watched a movie or anything on there. They straight up randomly just inject ads in at random times, often not even during scene breaks. Characters are sometimes mid-sentence... Oh, and we're back to the volume of the ads being 2x louder than the movie itself because I guess that law Congress passed way back in the day only applied to cable and broadcast TV.

It makes it nearly unwatchable. So get ready for that experience.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 39 points 3 months ago

All his stuff is on youtube. Why doesn't he upload to peertube? :/ It seems like he doesn't like youtube a lot but his content only exists there.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 63 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because that's where the audience is. Peertube is deader than the lemmyverse. You are essentially making the silly "but yet you choose to live in society" argument.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 3 months ago
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah right, we all know you have a single copy of digital items and you can either put it here or there, but not both. That's why NFTs were such a success! /s

[-] renard_roux@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago

That seems like a good idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] anachronist@midwest.social 23 points 3 months ago

I mean we're sitting here on the lemmyverse having a conversation..

But yeah creators should upload to peertube but they won't get any meaningful viewership there. The only way to break the network affect stranglehold google/youtube has over video content on the internet is making sure that if you do produce that content it's available via other channels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 17 points 3 months ago

You are essentially making the silly "but yet you choose to live in society" argument.

I don't think so. OP wasn't saying to stop uploading to YouTube, but to upload to alternate sites as well and maybe lead their audiences there by mentioning it in videos.

[-] Fitik@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago

Monetization is one of the main problem of PeerTube, it's more expensive to make videos than to write threads, and while on YouTube/Odysee/Rumble content creators earn money, on peertube they often need to pay to instance operators to pay for hosting

User experience for peertube is not the best too, while in the most of the Fediverse for instance to connect with other instances a user just needs to follow someone on it, on peertube instance owner needs to add instances to the list to federate their content

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 months ago

Just FYI the license in your comment doesn’t actually exist and the creative commons license it links to does not mention AI anywhere.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 18 points 3 months ago

Quick reminder that you are on Beehaw. There's only one rule here, and this sort of dismissive take does not adhere to it. Please find something substantive to dismiss.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

What do you mean. He was rude. Am I supposed to continue engaging with that? I don't enjoy abuse.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] TheMonkeyLord@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

By making that comment you did engage with it... Not commenting at all would have been disengaging...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brie@beehaw.org 25 points 3 months ago
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

Oh damn, I thought Odysee was dead and didn't give it a second thought. How is Odysee still alive?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 12 points 3 months ago

Why do you add that link to the end of every comment?

[-] threeduck@aussie.zone 20 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's like those Facebook posts where you tell Mark Zuckerberg that he's not allowed to profit off your photos.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

That's exactly what it is.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago

Harder to monetize on Peertube.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

But his youtube is already monetized. Uploading it to peertube is just an extra action that could help with its popularity.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] Mechanize@feddit.it 16 points 3 months ago

I find it funny that this is the first video where I'm consistently getting the "This helps us protect our community" and "Log in to confirm that you are not a bot" errors while using an alternative Frontend.

I'm sure it's just a random coincidence, but it is still funny to me.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago

↑ painting :)

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And yet, despite everyone complaining, YouTube knows damn well no one is going to stop using their shit so they’ll continue to do whatever they want.

Maybe people should just…. Stop using YouTube. That or don’t complain when they fuck over the content creators and users of their platform.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

I'm honestly not gonna use youtube without ad and sponsor block.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

people really overestimate how many people use ad blockers and sponsorblock....

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago

30% desktop, 15% mobile estimated in the US use ad blockers.
That is not insignificant by any means, even if it's overestimated.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

I imagine the amount of people using sponsorblock specifically are much smaller.

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

https://sponsor.ajay.app/stats/
You're right, but I think it's fairly safe to assume that if one knows about sponsorblock, they're using an ad blocker too.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

Of course, I was only saying few people used sponsor block compared to (any) general ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
187 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
269 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS