71
submitted 7 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden will hold a closely watched news conference on Thursday, marking another high-stakes moment for the president to show off his ability to answer questions in an unscripted setting.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 58 points 7 months ago

The fact that the most powerful individual in the wester world is being praised for holding an "unscripted" news conference is laughable. That's the bare minimum, not something to tout as a challenge or accomplishment.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And it's not that Trump isn't worse, it's that we expect better leadership on the way to stopping fucking fascism.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

He's done 37 this term...

trump did like 10x that, Obama did almost 500.

For Joe Biden this is a big event, which is a pretty big part of the problem.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

This is news? Being able to do this shouldn't be a question. It might be a challenge for him if he did it after dark.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Well republican CNN wants cast further doubt on him

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Yup, because people who saw the debate also had those same doubts. Trump lied, but that was expected and pointed out in several articles after the fact. Biden could barely even debate. He was a shadow of his former self and has no business being in that office.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

He sounded old and has a speech impediment. The content of his answers was sound to anyone that listened. The media and many people on social media have pivoted from attacking him on Israel to his stumbles during the debate. Biden being old is the strongest argument Republicans have against him and everyone that keeps parroting that message is only helping Trump. Most Israel coverage has slowed to a crawl, but stories about Israel and Biden have all but stopped. Quite the coincidence. It's been extremely effective at turning people off from Biden, the vast majority of which didn't watch a second of the debate.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So deny the elephant in the room because Trump might win? No thanks. All they need to do is nominate a candidate who might some day see the consequences of their decisions. Trump is, among many other terrible things, a rapist who tried to overthrow the government and worked to take away women's healthcare. I firmly believe any sane centrist candidate could beat him.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

One conference is good, but it's the absolute minimum.

He needs to do this regularly if he wants to shake the image of the doddering gran'pa.

Also, it has to go WELL. I'm sure he knows if he has just one moment where he's staring into space, he's done.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I have my doubts as to whether even knocking it out of the park with this interview could salvage things at this point. Not because of some essential failing of Biden, but because the narrative has already taken root, to the point of elected congresscritters chiming in.

Regardless of whether dropping the incumbent just before or at the convention is a GOOD idea, it is rapidly shaping up to be the least bad of our options.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It is a rare challenge, Normally news conferences have the interviewer and the person being interviewed.

Rarely does it only have just one person.

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

14 different brands of mics in my Amazon cart, let's go

[-] The_Worst@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago

The fact that this is even necessary might be a reason to change course.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Read Clooney’s opinion piece in the NYT today. Dude’s right. Joe Biden is a hero who saved our democracy in 2000. And he needs to step down to save our democracy again in 2024.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

What did he do in 2000?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The appearance will come at the conclusion of a critical NATO summit where foreign diplomats will have a front row seat to observe his ability to lead on the global stage.

Biden has held a historically low number of news conferences compared to his most recent predecessors – and has been encouraged by his top allies to lean into more “off-the-cuff,” casual moments in the aftermath of last month’s debate performance.

But in recent days, Biden’s team has leaned into their plans with stops at a church and campaign office in Philadelphia, a community event and a coffee shop in Harrisburg, a 22-minute interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos and an 18-minute call-in to MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” Biden’s team is already looking ahead to the next unscripted engagement, teasing an interview with NBC News’ Lester Holt set for Monday.

Biden has been largely insulated from potential signs of aging by his team, with strategies including short, tightly scripted events in which the president reads from a teleprompter; the use of shorter steps on Air Force One; and significantly pared-back engagement with reporters compared with his most recent predecessors.

But some Democrats are increasingly convinced that those efforts were less aimed at preventing spoken gaffes or freewheeling diversions and more focused on eliminating more alarming incidents showing a weakened, aging president in recent months.

Biden has remained dug in, emphatically dismissing any suggestion that he’s not the most qualified candidate to beat Trump in November and vowing to stay in the race.


The original article contains 1,000 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Democrats to Biden RN:

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
71 points (92.8% liked)

politics

20345 readers
1437 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS