27
I2P 2.6.0 Release - Blog - I2P (geti2p.net)
submitted 4 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17746311

This release, I2P 2.6.0, continues our work by fixing bugs, adding features, and improving the network's reliability.

Newer routers will be favored when selecting floodfill routers. I2PSnark received features which improve the performance of PeX(Peer Exchange), in addition to bug fixes. Legacy transport protocols are being removed, simplifying the code in the UDP transports. Locally-hosted destination will be reachable by local clients without requesting their LeaseSet, improving performance and testability. Additional tweaks were made to peer selection strategies.

I2P no longer allows I2P-over-Tor, connections from Tor exit IP addresses are now blocked. We discourage this because it degrades the performance of I2P and uses up the resources of Tor exits for no benefit. If you are a helpful person running both a Tor Exit and I2P we encourage you to continue to do so, using different IP addresses for each. Non-exit relays and Tor clients are unaffected by this and do not need to change anything.

As usual, we recommend that you update to this release. The best way to maintain security and help the network is to run the latest release.

RELEASE DETAILS Changes

  • Router: Increase minimum version for floodfill routers

  • Router: Disable I2P over Tor

  • Address Book: Cache locally hosted destinations

Bug Fixes

  • I2PSnark: Peer Exchange Tweaks

  • I2PSnark: Bugfixes

  • Router: Peer Selection Tweaks

Other

  • Translation updates
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Banning Tor is sus and not wise. I guess I2P traffic over Tor is barely noticeable for Tor, because I2P is much slower. Especially if you need do it by blocking ip addresses and cannot distinguish Tor nodes otherwise then you do it wrong. And now I2P literally has introduced global IP blocklist because of someone's opinionated decision.

[-] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Is it much slower though? I know it was, but is it still true? I get decent speeds on my torrents.

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

For web browsing i2p is still much slower for me than with Tor these days.

[-] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That's because you're using it for a purpose it wasn't intended. I2P isn't designed to be used to browse the regular internet, for that it's better to use TOR. However for anonymous torrenting or accessing i2p-sites, it's quite fast imho.

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That’s because you’re using it for a purpose it wasn’t intended. I2P isn’t designed to be used to browse the regular internet, for that it’s better to use TOR. However for anonymous torrenting or accessing i2p-sites, it’s quite fast imho.

Okay, good.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
623 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
ranok@sopuli.xyz