80
submitted 1 year ago by enkifish@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Wild that Elon Musk may have prevented a nuclear strike. Not really sure what to make of this since I don't trust anything he says.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

This stuff is being written about like he's wretched for doing it but as far as I know Starlink's TOS specifically says it can't be used for weapons (Checked, " Starlink is not designed or intended for use with or in offensive or defensive weaponry.") so this is just melon enforcing contract terms (lol) in order to prevent starlink from being targeted by Russia. Pretty sure the Russians could plink his low orbit satellites out of the sky if they decided they were a threat.

[-] MoreAmphibians@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Losing an offensive because I violated the TOS of the software I was using for command and control.

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Russians could plink his low orbit satellites out of the sky if they decided they were a threat.

Technically - yes. Realistically - doubt it. Might constitute an attack on USA, and amusingly Kremlin is just sane enough to try and avoid that (unlike certain others)

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, shooting down Starlink satellites would be the worst case response. More likely Musk was worried about his companies being targeted by sanctions or bans if Starlink got sorted into the "military industrial complex" category

[-] SimulatedLiberalism@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems pretty clear that Russia has already found ways to jam their satellite terminals (no need to even shoot down their satellites) so it’s just a face saving move than to say Starlink has been rendered completely useless for military purpose.

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago
[-] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Shotwell didn't provide details on how SpaceX disrupted Ukraine's use of Starlink but said, "there are things that we can do to limit their ability to do that... there are things that we can do and have done."

Now I'm curious what did, if not simply turning it off like the title suggests

[-] ItsPequod@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

Rate-limited in the middle of a firefight

[-] impiri@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Drone warfare makes high ping bastards of us all

[-] muzzle@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

But the truly galaxy brain move is in this article:

After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacson.

“The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

lol out of uncountable amount of Ls from him this was literaly the only thing even remotely approaching a W and he caved anyway what a god damn loser.

Lmao he bought Twitter for an exorbitant markup, it’s hemorrhaging money, and then the blue checks bullied him into turning down free pentagon money.

Stay winning buddy

[-] YouKnowIt@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Dumbest man alive, he became the richest man in the world by guzzling government money and he can't even grift the military? Truly pathetic

[-] jack@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago
[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Neoliberals will call communism a failure while they entrust the victory against their mortal enemy in the hands of a unpredictable manchild who likes to LARP as an underdog against “the system” and “current thing”. Truly the smartest bunch of people.

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Really? Has that stopped him before? Ya know, when Moskva got hit? When naval bases and ships in Sevastopol were getting swarm droned? Now he's suddenly worried?

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
80 points (100.0% liked)

news

23555 readers
665 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS