208
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 179 points 3 months ago

She was ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CALIFORNIA how the fuck would that insult ever, ever stick? Literally the general of all the lawyers. lmfao

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 67 points 3 months ago

Plus it seems like some weird ass info to pull out of your pocket like someone insults you and you bring up a test score of theirs from 30 years ago as a response.

[-] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Well he is a really weird guy. And also very old.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They shouldn't let him sit in on the mudslinging strategy sessions. He doesn't listen but then wants to participate. This is like how he was talking about drinking bleach, he heard something and is trying his best to repeat it.

Too old and suffering from dementia.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

Meh, she was a DEI Hire. None of her accolades or accomplishments mean anything, haven't you heard?

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, I have also heard she was Indian, until it was advantageous to be black, for her career. Many people are saying this. It must be true.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

No no, she became black. Like the guy in the 80s movie Soul Man.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

When did Trump decide to become orange? Has anyone checked if he's actually orange by nature or just pretending to be?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

He kept saying it in a quasi South African accent. Blek. Reminded me of Joe Pesci in Lethal Weapon II.

[-] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, once she found it would be advantageous to be black, she became black.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's never advantageous to be black in America.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Other than just satirizing Trump, that's the joke.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Since when have facts mattered to him or his supporters?

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Technically Trump is a genius.

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1286101530928611328

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 105 points 3 months ago

"She failed her bar exam. She did not pass her bar exam, so maybe she would not pass the cognitive test," Trump said. "She did not pass her bar exam, and she did not think she would pass it, and she did not think she would ever pass it, and I don't know what happened."

Many people are saying that Trump wouldn't pass a cognitive test live on television.

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago

Man thinks you have to study for a cognitive test.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

He said he wants to challenge her to one, and I just thought of the Knowledge Challenge between Billy and Eric in Billy Madison.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 months ago

Mr. Trump, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

... A simple "No" would have be fine.

[-] LittleTarsier@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Business Ethics!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 91 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Does he even understand how hard a bar exam is to pass? It’s pretty common to have to retake it.

Seems like first time it’s between 50 to 70% of people (depending on hear,)

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 65 points 3 months ago

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that because she was a courtroom prosecutor, and Attorney General of California, that she did ultimately pass the bar exam.

I'm going to go out another limb and say that Donald Trump has not passed a bar exam.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

That’s more like… a fork in the main trunk!

Trump probably hasn’t passed a test ever since his daddy realized what an idiot he spawned and started paying the tutors to test for him.

Probably around the first grade. Maybe kindergarten.

(Do they do tests in kindergarten?)

[-] teft@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Trump probably hasn’t passed a test ever

Wharton School of Business professor William T. Kelley — “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had”

You're probably right.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

What does that say about his cult followers?

[-] gjoel@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

They probably didn't attend Wharton School of Business.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago

(Do they do tests in kindergarten?)

I seem to recall being chided by the teacher in kindergarten for not being able to tie my shoes. I suppose that counts as a "test"?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

You wanna talk about savage things teachers sometimes say to students?

I had an art teacher in middle school, who said something to the effect of “Sometimes the point of art class is so you can learn you can’t do art.”

In her defense, it was one hideous clay mask.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago

Okay, now I have to tell this story.

Second grade, Catholic school, 1976. I'm standing in front of the class with some other students, writing cursive lower-case "l's" on the chalkboard. I am apparently not doing it right. The teacher comes over to me, grabs my cheek between her fingers, and shakes my head around while berating me.

This is not where the story ends.

At the end of the school day, I go to the office before my mom picks me up to go home, and tell the principal what happened. I kind of get the brush off, go climb into the back seat of my mom's yellow 1972 Cutlass, and go home.

This is not where the story ends.

Next day, I'm in class again, having mostly forgotten the previous day's nonsense. The principal shows up in the doorway and beckons me and the teacher into the hallway. Now I am fully reminded of the previous day, and kind of looking forward to what's about to happen.

Principal says to the teacher, "This young man tells me that you did this to him yesterday." -- grabbing my cheek and shaking my head around. Teacher: "No, I did not do this to him." -- grabbing my cheek and shaking my head around. "Are you certain you didn't do this to him?" "I am quite certain I didn't do this to him."

I was six years old. For a brief moment here, I was unable to recall the teacher's name, but it has returned to me: Mrs. Blattner. Having to deal with the principal on many more occasions through 8th grade, I will always remember what a worthless piece of shit Warren Smith was. I am quite certain they are both dead now, and the world is a better place for it.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The most memorable savage thing I remember a teacher doing is yelling "whaddya, stupid?" with a thick Boston accent, at a student in an AP chemistry class.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

Trump still thinks everyone should be impressed that he passed a test designed to indicate if a patient suffered brain trauma. Probably because it is the only test he has ever passed without cheating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Does he even understand how hard a bar exam is to pass?

He probably thinks its easy to learn how to mix drinks.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Considering the chemistry involved… I doubt he can pass even that test.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

But he has one of the best brains!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m sure the brain-doc’s say that; mostly because there’s so much wrong with it that they’re eagerly awaiting studying how it still kinda sorta functions despite being composed of something vaguely akin to lumpy mashed potatoes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

“Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.”

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

But man woman person camera though. He passed bigley

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

According to a friend of mine in California who went through the process. Grading on the bar exam there is simple. On every test, 50% pass and 50% fail. You either make the cut or retake the test. Somewhere around 70-80% of people fail to pass on the first try if I recall correctly.

He was not much fun to be around when he finished law school and was cramming for the bar. He passed it on the 2nd attempt.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

70-80% fail on their first try, and on every test, 50% pass and 50% fail. ???

[-] modeler@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So a bunch of people who fail on their first attempt, and they pass the second (or third) time. So, of all people who eventually pass, 70-80% took the test twice or more.

Corollary: in any given exam, 20-50% of all exam takers are there for the second (or more) time. So the total number of first-timers is considerably less than 100% and I'm guessing that their failure rate is greater than 50%.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A bunch fail on their first attempt, fewer fail it on subsequent attempts because they know what the test looks like and how to prep for it. If a test has a 50% pass rate but some of the test takers have taken it before and are more likely to pass, then the first time test takers will fail more than 50% of the time. Basically, the people who are on their second or third attempt will skew the results against first time test takers, because they’re eating up all of those “pass” spots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

The far right really hate people that had to work hard and deal with setbacks to get ahead. If you're not a nepo baby born with a silver spoon in your mouth, you're somehow a lesser being to them.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Trump shouldn’t be talking about someone else’s once failed bar exam, which she then passed and went on to edge out everyone else in her line of work. He’s has so many failed, bankrupt and fraudulent businesses.

Moreover, Trump failed as a president because of his inadequate response to Covid 19. Hundreds of thousands of people died who didn’t have to, and some are still reeling from repercussions of long covid. Americans deserve better.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump's sycophant lawyers have literally been disbarred

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 months ago

Maybe we should get Donald to release his SAT scores and college transcripts. Let's see if he has any basis for complaint. I bet his scores are lower than hers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
208 points (96.0% liked)

News

23287 readers
1272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS