322
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 124 points 3 months ago

Is he orange or is he white? Because up until a few years ago he was white, then went orange.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 46 points 3 months ago
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago

Please, do not disparage assholes.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Now you are just disparaging two groups

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Thankfully I'm non-bi when it comes to disparagement!

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

![https://media1.tenor.com/m/7OXvXMyAa0gAAAAd/buttholes-brooklyn99.gif](All the assholes)

[-] EisFrei@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

It's a shade of weird

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Someone should look into that

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Crab people, crab people, taste like crab, walk like people

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 90 points 3 months ago

Trump meltdown again reveals his named bigotry.

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Yeah that’s like saying “Apple reveals Apple’s existence as a corporate entity alongside new iPhones for 2024.”

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago

Memo to headline writers: please never put the words "Trump" and "naked" near each other again.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

So, back in the Runup for 2020, and when I still hoped a certain uncle wasn’t a full on cultist, I was trying to explain just how “unpresidential” and how scandalous he was as a president.

During the conversation, I pulled a picture of Trump in tan suit pants from somewhere, and threw some pixelation like they do on cops, and stuff.

That was all I did to, just pixelated his pants.

Then I showed them, saying “he’s so bad you don’t even question if this is real.”

The stared at the picture then totally thought he was just having some kind of wardrobe malfunction and that people totally lose their pants on stage… all the time

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

IMO, the real scandal was Trump wearing tan suit pants. How unpresidential can you be???

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Tan suit pants? Like some sort of foreigner terrorist?

[-] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 9 points 3 months ago

You mean a terrorist fist jab?

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Where are my pearls? I need something to clutch! I’m getting the vapors!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

May have been an ad for Bigly Bleach (for eyes, and safe to inject!).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Who was holding their breath? Do we have to wait until after the Doom Slayer comes for him until we're sure he's also a fucking demon?

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago
[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago

The American people deserve a leader who tells the truth. A leader who doesn’t respond with hostility and anger when presented with the facts. We deserve a leader who understands that our differences do not divide us. They are an essential source of our strength.

Damn right

Looking at the Obama/Romney debates just makes me sad. Things used to be so civil.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's a great way Harris could respond to this: "Yes, Donald, I am Indian. I am also black. Most importantly, I am an American.

An American who loves our country and the strength our melting-pot of diversity brings. "

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The "undecideds" are not looking for measured, reasonable "we go high when they go low" type responses - that's not the mindset for this moment, unfortunately (even if it's the decent thing). They are looking for her to dismissive tell him he's weird and move on. Because he is and she should.

Realize the weight of this moment, we can stand on principle as the ship sinks, or we can save the boat from sinking and then hopefully work back to civility from there.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

These aren't mutually exclusive. I'm entirely onboard with kneeing them when they go low. But you can do a one-two punch with mockery and dismissal while injecting some truth in a bite-sized form. That's literally what satirists do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

American, black, and Indian? How?!! We already have the mystery of the trinity. This is too much!!!

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Wrong picture. I think this is Trump at his MAGAGA event. They sure did make those Gloryholes great again.

[-] Skanky@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Photoshop experts - do your thing!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 months ago

Trump is going to dropping N-bombs by September.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I'm sure he never stopped. He may just get publicly saying it.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

Betting that when he drops it, Fox News will cover it up like, "Ah it was just locker room talk!" Or "How come you can say Cracker but you can't say N word what's the problem?"

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

cracker room talk

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

It is a tactic that has long been part of the underside of American politics: presenting an opponent as somehow ‘other’ or ‘not one of us’ — someone who cannot be trusted or truly known. But, it is a different time.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It didn't take this meltdown to see his naked bigotry, it's been on full display for decades.

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Well maybe this time, instead of energizing and recruiting more fascist it will show them the error of their ways.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I thought it was great seeing US journalists acting like journalists again, and asking actual real questions. They should have pushed even more so for him to actually answer the question. Don't go to the next question until the current question has been answered, even if it takes the entire night

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

It wasn't exactly hidden before

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
322 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1956 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS