327
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Donald Trump spent Monday morning labeling the turmoil in the global financial markets the “Kamala Crash,” giving Republicans hope that he might turn his focus to an economic message.

It didn’t last. By midday, the former president was already back to re-litigating his controversial appearance in Chicago last week, where he questioned Kamala Harris’ Black identity and suggested a major network journalist should be fired — “I didn’t know who she was, she was nasty,” he told a livestreamer.

Republicans on Monday reeled from Trump’s undisciplined approach to the opening stages of his new general election matchup with Harris — following a weekend that saw him praise Russian leader Vladimir Putin while smearing Harris as “low IQ,” and “dumb” and attacking a popular swing-state GOP governor whose turnout operation he may need in November.

“This is what you would call a public nervous breakdown,” said Matthew Bartlett, a GOP strategist and former Trump administration appointee. “This is a guy who cut through the Republican primary like a knife through butter. This is a guy who pummeled a semi-conscious president in a debate and literally out of a race. And now this is a guy who cannot come to grips with a competitive presidential race that would require discipline and effective messaging. And we’re seeing a candidate and a campaign absolutely melt down.”

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 159 points 2 years ago

This is a guy who pummeled a semi-conscious president in a debate and literally out of a race.

Yeah... no he didn't. They just knew they couldn't get enough Democrats energized to vote. And that was totally due to Biden and nothing to do with what Trump did.

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 33 points 2 years ago

I truly believe for anyone watching the debate that golf conversation was the end of both of their political careers.

[-] acchariya@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

The golf debate was the wtf are we even doing moment for me. It turned out to be a very powerful moment that allowed a new democratic candidate to rise above two old men blathering about their golf game.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Kamala is gonna tee up and out-drive them both anyway.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I admit I didn't watch it and I only scanned the coverage because I really didn't think it was going to change people's minds enough for Biden to drop out, although I clearly was wrong.

So what was the golf conversation?

[-] 5wim@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 years ago

Oh yeah well im bigly better at gulf than you

What? What? Fat chance, jack

etc.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Sounds very stupid. I don't regret not watching.

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 11 points 2 years ago

Honestly watch it. The whole debate is rough and then we hit this and I could feel the souls of Americans just huff. The whole debate Trump is saying nothing nonsense with no point. Biden is half awake and limping through it. Then this insane conversation takes place

https://youtu.be/5VyAfQBV2_c?feature=shared

At any moment any one of them could've bodied the other in this conversation and probably won the presidency if you had anyone more reasonable, intelligent, lucid there that would've been such a moment. Instead I'm sweating from cringe. With the state of everything, why the fuck are you arguing about golf?

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Wow, I hadn't watched any of it either but damn. Trump just being Trump by bragging about shit that only sounds impressive or meaningful to dumb people and then Biden, looking good until he opened his mouth, showed that maybe he should even resign right now because he's not all there and barely has any energy.

At some point, if we live long enough, there's a sudden and drastic decline where we go from just an older version of ourselves to elderly. Looks like Biden hit that point sometime during his current term.

I wonder if he's the first president to do so. Reagan had Alzheimer's, which can be worse mentally, but I don't know if he had the physical decline also.

That said, elderly Biden would still have been a better option than Trump. Not great (I don't think the Democrats will ever offer an option that threatens the status quo), but better than Trump.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

they were arguing over Joe's performances

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's almost as stupid as Trump and the others on stage arguing about penis size during one of the primary debates in 2016.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

This so much this ...trump is a felon and a threat to America but sure Joe say you'll golf with him ...ffs

[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

That might be what really happened, but what does Trump think happened?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Obviously Trump thinks it's all about Trump. But Matthew Bartlett isn't Donald Trump.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

Have you ever seen both of them together at the same time? 🤔

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

No, but his name isn't John Barron, so it can't be Trump.

(How fucking weird is it that he named his son after the fake name he used to give to the press to promote himself?)

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

Ugh. I'd forgotten all about his alter egos. My brain just cannot remember all the stupid shit he's done.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I want him to show up to his next rally with a different kind of bronzer and a brown wig claiming to be the new nominee, John Barron, Man of the People. Preferably with a completely insane back story about how he grew up poor in the south and joined a union at 13 at a steel mill.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 150 points 2 years ago

Lol. Eat shit and die, traitor filth. Harris 2024.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago

You left out the lying coward, rapist, racist, bigot, convicted felon, pedophile, old, illiterate, senile parts - but I sense you're not a fan?

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

Hey, now that you mention it, he is kind of a weird one!

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 2 years ago

That old loser should withdraw from the race.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Vance/Couch 2024: Because dolphins are fuckable too!

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Don't forget the latex glove!

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Vance did once and he and Couch had twins:

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Got lost in the pattern buffer.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Stably diffused, just like that extra finger.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 74 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

“This is a guy who cut through the Republican primary like a knife through butter. This is a guy who pummeled a semi-conscious president in a debate and literally out of a race.

Please. R wants him as their dictator, that's why he swept the primary, and Biden pummeled himself out of the race, Trump just had to make it through a couple hours without becoming completely unhinged, and he lied on average once per speaking minute during that time.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago

Surely it was way more than one lie per minute

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago

Actually you are right, I misremembered! :)

By the most up-to-date count, Trump lied 50 times during the debate. That's 16 more lies than his felony convictions. That's 48 more lies than his impeachments, and popular vote losses. If the 90 minute debate was actually divided equally into 45 minutes of speaking time for each candidate, Trump lied more than once per minute.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-complete-list-of-all-of-trumps-debate-lies/ar-BB1p3xZb

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

I hear or read the things he’s said, and it absolutely blows my mind that anyone can’t understand how absolutely stupid/demented he is.

The guy is a moron.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

His supporters view him as smart. Because compared to them, he is. That should terrify everyone

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

'A stupid person's idea of a smart person'

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago

A dumbass' smartass, if you will.

Weird.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago

I can handle about 10 seconds of him speaking and I start to feel my brains leaking out of my ears.

How the fuck anyone can listen to him is beyond me.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago

You remember that episode of the Boondocks where Huey watches junk TV and becomes so exhausted and apathetic that he can no longer think for himself by the end of the episode? That's why I refuse to even attempt to listen to Trump. Honestly I think that's how people get suckered in by Trump; he wears down the mind so much that it becomes too much trouble to think.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I think at the convention they tried covering their ears so they couldn't hear him.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 42 points 2 years ago

When he loses again in November I'm going to be hard as a rock

[-] BillDaCatt@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Trump has always rambled incoherently. That isn't new. His base loves him because he represents selfishness and racism. That is who they are. They don't seem to care that he is a coward and a nutjob. Rich people love him because he will do just about anything for anyone who will publicly shine his shoes.

He's a nitwit and he always has been.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
327 points (97.7% liked)

News

36366 readers
773 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS