157

This is just sad; I don't even know what channel aired this (if it's America's or not) but I feel secondhand embarrassment just looking at this from how desperate this is.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 73 points 11 months ago
[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 43 points 11 months ago
[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 59 points 11 months ago

Correction: literally this one

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

Needs the ghost of Harold Holt patting them on the back but we can just say he's invisible

[-] Darth_Reagan@hexbear.net 57 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty sure countries don't get to send an amount of athletes in a direct relation to their population?

[-] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

Yeah, China only gets to send one Olympic team.

[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

i mean if you chose the 5 best athletes in a middle-of-buttfuck-nowhere town to compete against the 5 best athletes in a city of a million people who do you think would win?

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 42 points 11 months ago

Its channel nine. An Australian network.

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago

they've got the exclusive streaming rights in aus lol

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think Stan Sports also has it. That's a streaming platform so it's probably nine for broadcast and Stan for streaming

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago
[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

I actually didn't know that. That explains it

[-] Civility@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You are like a little baby. Watch this: https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-sports-analytics/jsa240874

There is no Olympics Australia has not won.

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

change filipinos to us

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago

By that metric, Saint Lucia has 8 gold per 1.44 million residents.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wanna know something funny? Remember all the weird doping allegations the west is pushing on China with 0 evidence?

An organized doping scandal is literally breaking out in the West right now. As in, several hours ago.

They caught a famous American athlete and they snitched on the entire operation, with multiple other high profile athletes involved. Previous Olympic events, etc.

You’ve gotta try harder than that, man. The propaganda is making a mockery out of itself.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Ah but did you consider that hypothetically, the bad country could be doing it? Checkmate Tankie :smuglord: !

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

is it time to ban the US from the olympics?
Israel should have been banned a LONG time ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pastaguini@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

This is like how right after Oct. 7th Israeli officials tried to argue that it was like 50x worse than 9/11 because more people died per capita measured against the full population of both countries.

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

vast majority of deaths were due to the hannibal directive though

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Measuring the ethics of genocide in megadeaths per capita

[-] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

This some sense, but not that much sense - it doesn’t matter if your country has a hundred thousand people or a billion, there’s only so many events, and a maximum number of athletes per country per event that can be sent. Sure, a larger population increases the chances that a talent can be identified and trained, but peak human performance only has so much variance.

[-] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

true, except

crackers never take into account "resources per capita" or "food/land per capita" because it would demolish their narrative

[-] ComradePlatypus@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

It's really silly, because it is impressive that Australia is 3rd after the USA and China. Just settle for that.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

Since I'm a nerd who recently figured out you could just copy and paste Libeoffice tables into the comments, I'm going to post a table of all participating countries/regions sorted by gold medal per athlete when the Olympics are done.

This is an earlier table:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

we cannot be doing this cringe after spending all of week 1 (as per usual) roasting the great satan for ordering by total medals instead of by gold priority

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Anything they can do we can also do but slightly more pathetic

[-] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

Ordering by total medals is at least a normal way of ordering things that is useful information. This isn't any of those things.

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago
[-] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

Sure, I mean, this is an interesting metric. And it's not like Australia's a tiny nation that got lucky with one athlete. It's definitely something to brag about along with countries that brag about total medals and total golds.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

There's so many interesting metrics. The real cream of the crop metric is which country has the most WR and OR. You could get gold and still be mediocre with mediocre competition relative to the history of the sport, but world record is world record.

The US has a formidable amount of Olympic records even if you account for number of athletes send. And South Korea has an elite crop of athletes. Based on a table I've created from an earlier date, they have the best gold/athlete ratio, and from a quick scan, their number of OR is really impressive. They have half the OR of the US but only have a third of the number of athletes the US has.

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

Euro desparation for relevance as the former world hegemon and the current dog of the dying world hegemon.

[-] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I say let them have it. They don't have much else going on. It is actually quite impressive.

[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

Now do it by purchasing power parity per capita!

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

now control for the fact that swimming has too many medals

[-] HotAtForty@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

If you didn’t want Australia to win the most medals per capita then you shouldn’t have made being racist an Olympic sport

[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Per capita is divided by total number of participating athletes right? anakin-padme-4

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

People were literally making jokes about this concept on here like a week ago

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

There was something I came across years ago about how countries with a larger population were more likely to win the World Cup. There are a lot of things that go into this though.

[-] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hindu nationalists reeling.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
157 points (96.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13932 readers
740 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS