72
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 85 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, the man’s happiness was short-lived.

He recently revealed that his savings had significantly diminished due to the yen’s depreciation since the start of the year.

The man also expressed concern that if the yen continued to weaken, achieving financial freedom might remain out of reach, rendering his 21 years of hard work seemingly pointless and tragic.

Oof. He got pranked.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago

porky-happy sorry, the fed raising rates made the carry trade unprofitable. Back to work serf.

[-] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago

debate-me-debate-me "easy, just save more money for retirement"

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Its only a decline in Dollar terms, not purchasing power tbf.

if he were in Pakistan or some global South country, a 40% depreciation would (likely) mean a 40% reduction (maybe more) in purchasing power but its not 1:1 with Japan (and China, Russia, most Western countries).

spoiler

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What is CPI?

Edit: Consumer Price Index

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Maybe he had investments that were affected by it.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

I'd burn down the Japanese stock exchange at that point.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 65 points 2 years ago

Lives in a company dorm and rent is still $250 a month.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago

I'm definitely not complaining about OP's intentions, but this kinda thing has gotta be a subset of neoliberal propaganda.

[-] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago

I can only read this article in an extreme cynical manner

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The vibe I get from these articles is "see, even losers like you can be successful and independent if you tried just a bit harder". They also never mentions about how they paid for uni and have no family responsibilities whatsoever. If feel like Citations Needed needs to do a breakdown of these tropes.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 years ago

and have no family responsibilities whatsoever

There's corpo dorm mentioned, which combined with rest of content means no family and no social life.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

Oh totally. I might be reading into this too hard, but people not having to take care of parents, siblings, kids, or comrades is the unspoken entitlement in these stories.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

That may be the intention, but I think you'd have to be a neolib true believer for the article to read as anything but deeply dystopian

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

their definition of "success and independence" is also stupid, like imagine calling your economic system "the best possible outcome with no alternative" with all the best modern amenities etc. when you define "success" as being free from it... by not using these modern amenities to save money while wageslaving

dumb system run by evil morons

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago

That's more of a horror story until last paragraph.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

I thought this was a dunk tank post at first.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago

porky-happy: “Hey workers, if you really wanted to survive just eat rice in cold water for the rest of your life.”

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago

The article says he saved up 1.18 million Singapore dollars, which is about 892,000 USD. Are they seriously saying that's ”never have to work again” money?

[-] makotech222@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

at 4% withdrawal, thats $35680 usd a year to live off of, which is not hard at all if you have a house paid off.

[-] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

Now Little Johnnie can build his own apartment in New York City out of Galvanized Steel Frames, Eco Friendly Wood Veneers and Screws he Borrowed from His Auntie.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Political economy, this science of wealth, is therefore simultaneously the science of renunciation, of want, of saving and it actually reaches the point where it spares man the need of either fresh air or physical exercise. This science of marvellous industry is simultaneously the science of asceticism, and its true ideal is the ascetic but extortionate miser and the ascetic but productive slave. Its moral ideal is the worker who takes part of his wages to the savings-bank, and it has even found ready-made a servile art which embodies this pet idea: it has been presented, bathed in sentimentality, on the stage. Thus political economy – despite its worldly and voluptuous appearance – is a true moral science, the most moral of all the sciences. Self-renunciation, the renunciation of life and of all human needs, is its principal thesis. The less you eat, drink and buy books; the less you go to the theatre, the dance hall, the public house; the less you think, love, theorise, sing, paint, fence, etc., the more you save – the greater becomes your treasure which neither moths nor rust will devour – your capital. The less you are, the less you express your own life, the more you have, i.e., the greater is your alienated life, the greater is the store of your estranged being. Everything which the political economist takes from you in life and in humanity, he replaces for you in money and in wealth; and all the things which you cannot do, your money can do. It can eat and, drink, go to the dance hall and the theatre; it can travel, it can appropriate art, learning, the treasures of the past, political power – all this it can appropriate for you – it can buy all this: it is true endowment. Yet being all this, it wants to do nothing but create itself, buy itself; for everything else is after all its servant, and when I have the master I have the servant and do not need his servant. All passions and all activity must therefore be submerged in avarice.

from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/needs.htm

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Okay, this might be the thing that actually gets me to read theory. Hasan ain’t got SHIT on that quote lmao

[-] NoLeftLeftWhereILive@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago

What I don't understand about people like this is the wasting of all your younger years for some hypothetical future of leisure when you could die in your sleep today. Like, what's the point?

It feels like a complicated exercise in some sort of meaning seeking in a hollow world, like some bastardization of seeking enlightenment or freedom from purely selfish and individualistic goals that don't even benefit you.

And no better example of how the system we live in is not built for the proles, all this saving and then suddenly the value can just be gone. And still they keep going.

Is this economic frugality as a religion or something, not sure. But it sure is weird.

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

What I don't understand about people like this is the wasting of all your younger years for some hypothetical future of leisure when you could die in your sleep today.

yeah literally this, its so fucking insane, leave it to the bloody singaporean media to publish such depressing neoliberal bullshit

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago

What I don’t understand about people like this is the wasting of all your younger years for some hypothetical future of leisure when you could die in your sleep today. Like, what’s the point?

It's just a matter of having accepted and internalised what the point is of you being born and alive is as told by the ruling class. You are supposed to work your bones off, generating surplus value for your masters, and be miserable in the off time, unable to imagine a better world.

[-] wheresmysurplusvalue@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

And even if you don't die, why would you trade young healthy years for when you're older, have less energy, and possibly less mobile?

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14302 readers
634 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS